Synthesis and Antimicrobial Evaluation of Benzimidazole Analogs

 

YS Rane, RR Varma, LS Patil, SV Athlekar, AS Chowdhary and AS Bobade*

Department of Chemotherapy, Haffkine Institute for Training, Research and Testing, Parel Mumbai -12

*Corresponding Author E-mail: yora_03@yahoo.com, rajeevvarma84@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

A series of benzimidazole phenylthiocarbamoyl derivatives were synthesized by condensing substituted 2-mercaptobenzimidazole with substituted benzoyl chlorides. These benzimidazole derivatives were evaluated for their antibacterial activity against Gram Positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 3750) and Gram Negative bacteria Salmonella typhi (NCTC 786), as well as antifungal activity against a fungal strain Candida albicans (ATCC 10231). It was observed that the 5-naphthoxy-6-chloro benzimidazole derivatives having dichloro substitutions on the phenylthiocarbamoyl part of the molecule showed better activity than the rest.

 

KEYWORDS: Benzimidazole, antimicrobial, phenylthiocarbamoyl derivatives, benzoyl chloride

 


 

INTRODUCTION:

Benzimidazole derivatives have been known in literature for their broad range of biological activities.

 

During the literature survey, it was found that 2-mercapto benzimidazole derivatives1 namely, 5(6)-chloro-2-(benzylthio) benzimidazole possesses antifungal activity against Trichophyton interdigitale. Similarly, antibacterial and antifungal activity was also reported for benzimidazole derivatives2,3. Benomyl4 is another antifungal compound having benzimidazole moiety with a carbamido linkage. Also 5-methoxy-2-mercapto benzimidazole has been found as an intermediate for Omeprazole5 which is a potent antiulcer agent and used in treatment of Zollinger Ellison syndrome.

 

Hence, keeping in mind the above mentioned literature, we have reported herewith 16 derivatives of substituted 2-(substituted phenylthiocarbamoyl) benzimidazole, whose structures were confirmed by C,H,N analysis and IR as well as NMR spectra and then were screened for their antimicrobial potency.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Melting points were determined in open glass capillaries using Thermonik Precision Melting Point Cum Boiling Point Apparatus Model C-PMB-2 and were uncorrected. Purity of the compounds was checked by precoated TLC plates [E. Merck Kieselgel].

 

C, H, N analysis was carried out on Thermo Finnegan Flash EA 1112. The IR spectra were recorded using KBr pellets on BOMEM FTIR MB–10452M 5903L spectrophotometer. The 1H-NMR spectra were recorded on JEOL–AMX–400 (300MHz) spectrophotometer using T.M.S. as an internal standard.

 

EXPERIMENTAL:

Step I: Preparation of 5-phenoxy-4-chloro-2-nitroaniline (III)

In a 250 ml round bottom flask, a mixture of Phenol (II) (0.949 g, 0.01 mol) and anhydrous potassium carbonate (1.40 g, 0.01 mol) was refluxed in dimethyl formamide at 140°–160°C for 2 hours. To this reaction mixture, 4,5-dichloro-2-nitroaniline (2.07 g, 0.01 mol) (I) dissolved in dimethyl formamide was added drop wise at same temperature. Reaction was further refluxed for 6-8 hours. After completion of reaction, reaction mixture was brought down to room temperature and then was poured into crushed ice. Product (III) separated was filtered and recrystallized from ethanol.

 

Step II: Preparation of 5-Phenoxy-4-chloro- Ortho Phenylene Diamine (OPD) [IV]

5-phenoxy-4-chloro-2-nitroaniline (0.01 mol) (III) formed using above method, was further reduced at 60° – 80°C with Raney-Nickel and Hydrazine Hydrate in ethanol for 4–6 hours6. After completion of reaction, Raney-Nickel was filtered off and decomposed in 10% dil. HCl. Excess of ethanol was removed by vacuum distillation, and the concentrated solution remaining was poured into crushed ice and the product 5-Phenoxy-4-chloro-ortho phenylene diamine (IV) was filtered and dried.

Step III: Preparation of 5-phenoxy-6-chloro-2-mercapto benzimidazole (V).

Potassium hydroxide (0.01 mol) was dissolved in (1:5) mixture of water and ethanol. The mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature and to this mixture carbon disulfide (0.017 mol) was added with constant stirring and this led to the formation of potassium ethylxanthate solution.

 

4-phenoxy-5-chloro OPD (0.01 mol) (IV) was taken in 15 ml of ethanol and was refluxed. After half an hour, potassium ethylxanthate solution prepared as above was added drop wise and was further refluxed for 8–10 hours.

The reaction mixture was concentrated under vacuum to remove most of the ethanol. The concentrated solution was poured into crushed ice and neutralized with dil. HCl. The solid product 5-phenoxy-6-chloro-2-mercapto benzimidazole (V) separated was filtered, washed with water, dried and recrystallized from ethanol.

 

Step IV: Synthesis of 5-phenoxy-6-chloro-2-(4-chloro phenyl thiocarbamoyl) benzimidazole (VII-g)

In a 100 ml three necked dry round bottom flask, was placed a mixture of triethyl amine 0.10 g. (0.003 mol) and a solution of 5-phenoxy-6-chloro-2-mercapto benzimidazole (0.002 mol) (V) in 10 ml dry 1,4-dioxane. The reaction mixture was stirred on a mechanical stirrer at 50° – 60°C for about half an hour. To this, was added dropwise, a solution of 4-chloro benzoyl chloride (0.001 mol) (VI) in 10 ml dry 1,4-dioxane at same temperature. After the addition, reaction mass was stirred for 6 – 8 hours. It was kept overnight at room temperature. The solution was poured into crushed ice. The solid separated out was filtered and washed with water and dried. It was then recrystallized from ethanol.

 

As per the procedures described above, 16 derivatives [VII-a – VII-p] were synthesized and their physical data have been presented in Table-I.

 

VII-a: Yield: 61%; M.P.: 168°C

IR (KBr): 875, 850, 805 (5-substituted benzimidazole); 1263 (Ar-O-Ar); 1450, 710 (C-S, sulfide linkage), 1550 (C=N stretching), 1691 (C=O stretching)

1H NMR (δ, ppm): 6.93 – 7.75           [m, 9H (8H, Ar-H), (1H, -NH)]

 

VII-b: Yield: 60%; M.P.: 182°C

IR (KBr): 881, 856, 812 (5-substituted benzimidazole), 1279 (Ar-O-Ar); 1458, 707 (C-S, sulfide linkage); 1557 (C=N stretching), 1688 (C=O stretching)

1H NMR (δ, ppm): 6.85 – 8.08           [m, 16H (15H, Ar-H), (1H, -NH)].

 

VII-d: Yield: 65%; M.P.: 208– 210°C

IR (KBr): 877, 838, 796 (5-substituted benzimidazole), 1259 (Ar-O-Ar), 1443, 716 (C-S, sulfide linkage), 1555 (C=N stretching), 1676 (C=O stretching), 727 (C-Cl Stretching)

1H NMR (δ, ppm): 6.81-7.89              [m, 15H (14H, Ar-H), (1H, -NH)],

 

VII-i: Yield: 61%; M.P.: 159°C

IR (KBr): 909, 847, 813 (5-substituted benzimidazole), 1245 (Ar-O-Ar), 1462, 686 (C-S, sulfide linkage), 1580 (C=N stretching), 1695 (C=O stretching), 712, 730 (C-Cl Stretching).

1H NMR (δ, ppm): 7.03 – 8.18 [m, 12H (11H, Ar-H); (1H, –NH)]

 

VII-k: Yield: 62%; M.P.: 166 – 168°C

IR (KBr): 930, 855, 824 (5-substituted benzimidazole), 1258 (Ar-O-Ar), 1465, 690 (C-S, sulfide linkage), 1590 (C=N stretching), 1707 (C=O stretching), 739 (C-Cl Stretching).

1H NMR (δ, ppm): 6.90 – 8.12 [m, 11H (10H, Ar-H); (1H, –NH)]

 

VII-m: Yield: 62%; M.P.: 170 – 172°C

IR (KBr): 903, 831, 801 (5-substituted benzimidazole), 1270 (Ar-O-Ar), 1440, 718 (C-S, sulfide linkage), 1567 (C=N stretching), 1681 (C=O stretching), 754, 785  (C-Cl stretching).

1H NMR (δ, ppm): 6.90 – 8.15 [m, 12 H (11H, Ar-H); (1H, –NH)].

 

VII-p: Yield: 70%; M.P.: 235 – 237°C

IR (KBr): 914, 826, 789 (5-substituted benzimidazole), 1250 (Ar-O-Ar), 1440, 720 (C-S, sulfide linkage), 1585 (C=N stretching), 1701 (C=O stretching), 770 (C-Cl stretching).

1H NMR (δ, ppm): 6.77 – 8.19 [m, 13 H (12H, Ar-H); (1H, –NH)].

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

In vitro antimicrobial evaluation of all synthesized title compounds [VII-a – VII-p] was conducted against Gram Positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 3750), Gram Negative bacteria Salmonella typhi (NCTC 786) and a fungal strain i.e. Candida albicans (ATCC 10231). The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) was defined as the lowest concentration inhibiting the growth of the organism. The test compounds were subjected to in vitro screening by serial tube dilution technique7.  The detailed results of antimicrobial activity are mentioned in Table-I

 

Antibacterial activity:

The synthesized title compounds [VII-a – VII-p] were screened for their antimicrobial potency. Muller-Hinton broth was used as the culture medium. It was observed that naphthoxy substituted benzimidazole with dichloro substitution on the phenyl thiocarbamoyl ring was the most potent amongst them. Phenoxy and naphthoxy substitutions on benzimidazole ring with unsubstituted phenyl thiocarbamoyl portion [VII-a – VII-d] was the least effective amongst them. Hence substitution on the phenyl thiocarbamoyl ring is essential for antibacterial activity.

 


Schematic Representation of the title compounds prepared:

 

TABLE 1: Physical Properties & Bioactivity of the Title compounds (VII-a – VII-p)

 

Compound

 

R

 

R1

 

R2

 

M. P.

(0C)

 

Yield

(%)

Antimicrobial Activity (μg/ml)

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

S. aureus

ATCC 3750

S. typhi

NCTC 786

C. Albicans

ATCC 10231

VII-a

H

Phenyl

H

168

61

N.A.

N.A.

N.A.

VII-b

H

2-Naphthyl

H

182

60

200

200

200

VII-c

Cl

Phenyl

H

175

63

100

N.A.

N.A.

VII-d

Cl

2-Naphthyl

H

208-210

65

200

200

200

VII-e

H

Phenyl

4-Chloro

153

60

200

100

200

VII-f

H

2-Naphthyl

4-Chloro

172

66

100

100

100

VII-g

Cl

Phenyl

4-Chloro

169

62

100

100

200

VII-h

Cl

2-Naphthyl

4-Chloro

196-198

65

50

100

100

VII-i

H

Phenyl

2,4-Dichloro

159

61

100

200

200

VII-j

H

2-Naphthyl

2,4-Dichloro

170

69

100

50

50

VII-k

Cl

Phenyl

2,4-Dichloro

166-168

62

100

100

100

VII-l

Cl

2-Naphthyl

2,4-Dichloro

187

68

50

100

50

VII-m

H

Phenyl

3,4-Dichloro

170-172

62

100

200

200

VII-n

H

2-Naphthyl

3,4-Dichloro

189-191

68

50

200

50

VII-o

Cl

Phenyl

3,4-Dichloro

215-217

63

50

200

100

VII-p

Cl

2-Naphthyl

3,4-Dichloro

235-237

70

50

50

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

· Elemental Analysis for each compound was within the range of ± 0.4, · N.A. = Not Active upto 200 µg/ml, · Ampicillin (MIC 0.04 μg/ml) used as standard against S. aureus, · Trimethoprim (MIC 0.01 μg/ml) used as standard against S. typhi, · Miconazole (MIC 0.01 μg/ml) as standard against C. albicans.


 

Antifungal activity:

Similarly, the title compounds were also screened for their antifungal activity against a fungal strain i.e. Candida Albicans. Here, Sabouraud-Dextrose was used as a culture medium. 5-phenoxy benzimidazoles with unsubstituted phenyl thiocarbamoyl moiety [IV-a, IV-c] was inactive against Candida Albicans. Naphthoxy benzimidazole derivatives with dichloro substitution showed better activity i.e. MIC up to 50 µg/ml than the rest of the synthesized compounds.

 

Overall, naphthoxy derivatives of benzimidazole with dichloro substitution were comparatively more effective against all the three strains, where dichloro substitution at 3,4 position [VII-p] was the most effective.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

The authors wish to thank The Institute of Science, Mumbai for recording spectral analysis and Sophisticated Analytical Instrument Facility (SAIF), IIT Bombay for carrying out the Elemental analysis.

 
REFERENCES:

1.       Nakajima S, Tonak I, Seki T, Anmo T, Yakugaka Zasshi 78, 1958, 1378 – 82; Cited from, Chem. Abstr. 53: 8124b (1959).

2.       Reddy V B, Singla R K et al, Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry, 2(2), 2008, 162.

3.       Yadav A G, Patil V N et al, Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry,         2(4), 2009, Accepted & In Press.

4.       Adams; Dewitt, C; Schlatter; Rudolph; Ger. Offen; 1,956,157 (1970); Cited from, Chem. Abstr. 73, 1970, 3536m.

5.       Budhavari S, Mary Adele J, Neil, Smith A H, Goanne P E, Kennary, F.; ‘The Merck Index’; Twelfth edn; 6977.

6.       Leggeter B E, Brown R K; Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 38(1960): 2363-2366.

7.       Konemann, E V, Janda, W M, Allens, D et al, ‘Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology.’ J. B. Lippincott Company; Third edn. (1983), 437.

 

 

 

Received on 01.12.2009        Modified on 28.01.2010

Accepted on 27.02.2010        © AJRC All right reserved

Asian J. Research Chem. 3(2): April- June 2010; Page 342-345