Comparison of Anti-Hyperlipidemic Activity in Ashwagandharishta Prepared By Traditional and Modern Methods
Tiwari Preeti1* and Patel R.K.2
1Department of Pharmacognosy, Shri Sarvajanik Pharmacy College, Mehsana-384 001 (N. Gujarat).
2Department of Pharmacognosy, Shri. S. K. Patel College of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Kherva-382711 (N. Gujarat)
*Corresponding Author E-mail: preetitiwari198311@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT:
The present study was carried out to compare the lipid peroxidation activity and related hypolipidaemic activity in Ashwagandhrishta-T and Ashwagandhrishta -M prepared by traditional and modern methods with standard Atorvastatin. Hypolipidaemic activity was evaluated on cholesterol fed rats. The antioxidant activity of Ashwagandharishta-T and Ashwagandharishta-M was increased in a concentration dependent manner. Ashwagandharishta-T and Ashwagandharishta-M inhibited the ferrous sulphate induced lipid per-oxidation in a dose dependent manner and showed inhibitory concentration (IC50) value 181.88 and 191.05 µg/ml, respectively. In hypolipidemic activity Ashwagandharishta-T and Ashwagandharishta-M at the dose of 2.0ml/kg body weight orally significantly reduced serum cholesterol (47% and 46%), serum LDL (66% and 65%), and serum triglycerides (35% and 34%). The increase in serum HDL was 19% when compared to control with both the AshwagandharishtaT and M and reduction in atherogenic index was found 1.25 and 1.29 in Ashwagandharishta-T and Ashwagandharishta-M treated groups respectively, which strongly supports anti-atherosclerotic property of Ashwagandharishta.
KEYWORDS: Ashwagandharishta, Lipid per-oxidation, Atherogenic index, Anti-hyperlipidemic activity.
The association of raised serum cholesterol and Triglycerides with cardiovascular disease is well known. Hypolipidemic drugs are those, which lower the level of lipids and lipoproteins in blood1. The hypolipidemic drugs have attracted considerable attention because of their potential to prevent cardiovascular disease by retarding the accelerated atherosclerosis in hyperlipidemic individuals and accelerated atherosclerosis cause hypertension, which can cause heart attack. This is the second leading cause of death in the world. Heart attack can occur in any person, manifests itself in various ways- as a sudden episode of weakness of half of the body, confusion, slurring of speech, visual disturbances, headache, vertigo, altered consciousness, usually happening altogether2.
Ashwagandharishta is a polyherbal hydro-alcoholic ayurvedic preparation and is used as rasayana3. Rasayanas are used to promote health and longevity by increasing defence against disease, arresting the ageing process and revitalizing the body in debilitated conditions4.
The chief ingredient of Ashwagandharishta is roots of Ashwagandha, Withania somnifera, commonly known for its usefulness in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia, arthritis in combination with other drugs, is also credited to be hypoglycemic and diuretic5.The pharmacological effect of the roots of Withania somnifera is attributed to Withanolides, a group of steroidal lactones6.
Besides Withania roots,all the other ingredients of Ashwagandharishta as Arjuna ( Bark of Terminalia arjuna), Liquorice (roots of Glycyrrhiza glabra), Majith ( roots of Rubia cordifolia), Rasna ( roots of Alpinia chinensis), Taj ( inner bark of Cinnamomum zeyleynicum), Nagarmotha ( rhizomes of Cyperus rotundus), haritaki ( fruits of Terminalia chebula), turmeric( rhizomes of Curcuma longa), Nagakesara ( stamens of Messua ferrea) etc. contain a rich quantity of phenolic compounds and flavonoids and possess significant antioxidant activity7-12. Therefore, we undertook the present investigation to evaluate the hypolipidemic effect of Ashwagandharishta prepared by traditional and modern methods, Ashwagandharishta-T and Ashwagandharishta-M respectively in high fat diet induced hyperlipidemic wistar albino rats.
MATERIAL AND METHOD:
Preparation of Ashwagandharishta:
Ashwagandharishta-T:
This was prepared by method as given in Ayurvedic Formulary of India3.The ingredients of Ashwagandharishta were procured from Local market, Jamnagar. Identification of all the individual plant material was done as per Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India. Authentication of all these ingredients was done in the Botany Department of Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic plants (CIMAP), Lucknow. Prepared herbarium has been deposited in the CIMAP for future reference.
According to this method, coarsely powdered Ashwagandha roots (Withania somnifera) with prescribed ingredients were placed in polished vessel of brass along with prescribed quantity of water (24.576L) and allowed to steep. After 12 h of steeping, this material was warmed at medium flame until the water for decoction reduced to one eighths of the prescribed quantity (3.072 L), then the heating was stopped and it was filtered in cleaned vessel and after that honey was added. Then, Dhataki flowers (Woodfordia floribunda), and Prakshepa dravyas as Sonth, marich, pippali, tvak, Tejpatra, priyangu and nagakesara were added and this sweet filtered material was placed for fermentation in incubator for fifteen days at 33oC±1oC. After 15 days, completion of fermentation was confirmed by standard tests13.The fermented preparation was filtered with cotton cloth and kept in cleaned covered vessel for further next seven days. Then, the preparation was poured in amber colored glass bottles, packed and properly labeled.
Ashwagandharishta-M:
Method of preparation was same as followed with Ashwagandharishta-T only Dhataki flowers were replaced with Yeast for inducing fermentation14.
Animals:
As per the guidelines of CPCSEA, adult Wistar albino rats, weighing between 200-220g of either sex were acclimatized to normal environmental conditions in the laboratory for one week and given a standard chow diet (Hindustan Lever Ltd) and water ad libitum.
Chemicals:
Thiobarbituric acid was obtained from Loba Chemie, India. Ferrous sulphate, trichloro acetic acid, Potassium dihydrogen phosphate, Potassium hydroxide, were of analytical grade and obtained from Ranbaxy fine chemicals.
Assay of lipid per oxidation:
The extent of lipid peroxidation in goat liver homogenate was measured in vitro in terms of formation of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) by using standard method15 with the help of spectrophotometer. Goat liver was purchased from local slaughter house. Its lobes were dried between blotting paper (to remove excess blood) and were cut into small pieces with a heavy-duty blade. They were then homogenized in glass-Teflon homogenizing tubes in cold phosphate buffer saline (pH 7.4). It was centrifuged at 2000rpm for 10 min, and supernatant was diluted with phosphate buffer saline up to final concentration of protein 0.8-1.5 mg/0.1ml. Protein concentration was measured by using standard method16. To study the comparative response, the experiment was divided into five groups. Liver homogenates (5%, 3ml) was aliquoted to seven different glass Petri dishes. The first two groups were treated as control and standard where buffer and Vit. E was added. In the third to seventh group, different concentration (100, 150, 200, 250 and 300 µg/ml) of Ashwagandharishta-T and Ashwagandharishta-M were added. Lipid peroxidation was initiated by adding 100µl of 15mM ferrous sulphate solution to 3 ml of liver homogenate. After 30 min, 100µl of this reaction mixture was taken in a tube containing 1.5ml of 10% trichloro acetic acid. After 10 min, tubes were centrifuged and supernatant was separated and mixed with 1.5ml of 0.67% thiobarbituric acid. The mixture was heated in a water bath at 85°C for 30 min, and in boiling water bath to complete the reaction. The intensity of pink colored complex formed was measured at 535 nm.
The percentage of inhibition of lipid per-oxidation was calculated by comprise the results of the test with those of controls as per the following formula i.e. Eq. (1);
Percentage Inhibition = (Control Absorbance- Test Absorbance) X 100/Control absorbance.
Determination of hypolipidaemic activity:
Experimental design:
Thirty wistar albino rats were divided in following five groups of six each.
Group I (-ve Control): Normal diet (Standard chow diet)
Group II (+veControl): High Fat Diet (HFD)
Group III: HFD+ Ashwagandharishta-T (2.0 ml/kg bw/day p.o)
Group IV: HFD+ Ashwagandharishta-M (2.0 ml/kg bw/day p.o)
Group V: HFD+Atorvastatin (1.2 mg/Kg b.w./day p.o)
The compositions of the two diets were as follows:
Control Diet(Normal):
Wheat flour 100g
Sucrose 50g
Hydrogenated vegetable oil 5ml
Casein 20g
Cellulose 4g
Salt mixture (NaCl, KCl, CaCl2) 1.5g
Citric acid 0.5ml
Vitamin B complex composition
High fat Diet
Wheat flour 100g
Sucrose 50 g
Hydrogenated vegetable oil 10ml
Casein 20g
Butter 10g
Cellulose 4g
Salt mixture (NaCl, KCl, CaCl2): 1.5g
Cholesterol (dried egg yolk) 0.5g
Citric acid 0.5ml
Vitamin B complex composition.
Procedure:
Group I served as normal control and was given water 2.0ml/kg bwt orally along with normal diet. Group II, III, IV and V received high fat diet plus cholesterol for induction of hyperlipidemia. In addition to this, group III and IV were given Ashwagandharishta –T and Ashwagandharishta-M (2 ml/kg b.w. /day p.o) while group V received Atorvastatin (1.2 mg/kg b.w. /day p.o) for nine weeks 17.
Body weight of each animal was noted at the beginning and at the end of the experiment. During the whole period, the animals have free access to food and water. Twenty hours prior the end of the experiment, food was withdrawn and blood samples were taken by retro-orbital plexus. The blood samples were centrifuged for 12 minutes at 16 00 rpm. Serum Total Cholesterol18, Serum HDL19, Serum LDL19, Serum VLDL20, Serum Triglycerides20, were determined in each blood sample.
These parameters were estimated by using Span Diagnostic and Erba Diagnostic Kits.
The LDL, VLDL and Atherogenic index were calculated by using the following Friedewald formulae19
LDL = TC – HDL – VLDL (where VLDL = TG/5)
Atherogenic index = (LDL+VLDL)/HDL
Statistical analysis
All data are expressed as mean ±SEM. For comparison amongst different groups, one-way ANOVA was performed. A significance value (p< 0.001) was considered statistically significant.
Table-1 Effect of Ashwagandharishta- T and M on Lipid Per-oxidation model
Concentration ( µg/ml) |
Percentage Inhibition |
|
Ashwagandharishta-T |
Ashwagandharishta-M |
|
300 |
63.48±0.62 |
62.15±0.67 |
250 |
60.15±0.58 |
59.24±0.62 |
200 |
58.27±0.63 |
57.32±0.54 |
150 |
45.16±0.57 |
43.78±0.59 |
100 |
35.74±0.48 |
33.97±0.51 |
Vitamin E ( 5mM) |
68.32±0.42 |
|
IC50 (µg/ml) |
181.88 |
191.05 |
All values are expressed as Mean ± SEM of Replicates of three
RESULTS:
Assay of lipid peroxidation:
The results presented in Table-1, showed that both the Ashwagandharishta-T and M, inhibited ferrous sulphate induced lipid per-oxidation in a dose dependent manner. The Ashwagandharishta T and M at 300µg/ml exhibited maximum inhibition (63.48% and 62.15% respectively), which is nearly equal to the inhibition produced by Vit. E (5mM). The IC50 value was found to be 181.88 and 191.05 µg/ml with Ashwagandharishta-T and M respectively. The inhibition could be caused by the absence of ferryl-perferryl complex or by changing the ratio of ferric to ferrous or by reducing the rate of conversion of ferrous to ferric or by changing the iron itself or combination thereof15 .
Hypolipidemic activity:-
A significant reduction in body weight of rats was observed in Ashwagandharishta-T and M treated groups III and IV, respectively in comparison to control group as shown in Table-2.
Table-2 Effect on Body Weight of rats of all groups
S. No. |
Treatment Groups |
Initial Body Weight ( g) |
Final Body weight (g) |
1. |
Group I |
213.72±2.27 |
215.46±1.84 |
2. |
Group II |
216.15±2.14 |
232.14±2.41 |
3. |
Group III |
215.56±1.87 |
217.25±2.34*** |
4. |
Group IV |
215.17±2.32 |
219.27±1.73*** |
5. |
Group V |
214.2±1.92 |
216.0±1.84*** |
All values are expressed as Mean± SEM, n = 6, ***p< 0.001 vs Control group
A one hundred seven percent (107%) increase in serum total cholesterol (TC) was noticed in rats fed with high fat diet and cholesterol (group II) in compare to rats fed normal diet (group I). Administration of Ashwagandharishta –T and M lowered the serum total cholesterol by 47% and 46% in group III and group IV, respectively (Table-3). A significant reduction in serum LDL cholesterol was observed in Ashwagandharishta –T and M treated groups and lowering percentage was 66% and 65 % respectively. The HDL cholesterol level was significantly reduced in group II due to high fat diet, which became normal in group-III and IV, with the effect of Ashwagandharishta- T and M .Ashwagandharishta-T and M treated groups showed reduction in atherogenic index in comparison to control.s Both of these preparations as Ashwagandharishta- T and M showed significant decrease in serum triglycerides that was 35 and 34 percent respectively.
DISCUSSION:
Lipids are widely involved in oxidation reactions and these reactions, can be induced by free radicals called Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS). Oxidative stress caused by ROS in the living cell is associated with numerous diseases, like coronary heart disease, atherosclerosis, inflammation, cancer, anemia, and age related muscular degeneration and ageing. Use of anti oxidants (substances that when present in low concentrations with those of an oxidizable substrate, significantly retard oxidation of that substance) can postpone problems caused by ROS and they retard oxidation process. Enzyme modifying actions of anti-oxidants could account for their pharmacological activities. In our present study Ashwagandharishta-T and M was evaluated for free radical scavenging activity and showed potent anti-oxidant activity and evidenced that free radical scavenging potential helps in ameliorating disease process21.
Table-3: Effect of Ashwagandharishta-T and M on Various Serum Levels in Hyperlipidaemic Rats.
Groups |
Treatment |
Diet |
Dose ml or mg/kg b.wt/day p.o |
Total Cholesterol mg/dl |
HDL mg/dl |
LDL mg/dl |
VLDL mg/dl |
Triglycerides mg/dl |
Atherogenic index |
I |
Normal |
Normal diet |
2.0 ml/kg water |
108.25±0.34 |
56.45± 0.11 |
36.92 ±0.33 |
16.26± 0.58 |
81.30± 0.74 |
0.942 |
II |
Control |
High fatty diet |
2.0 ml/kg water |
224.12±0.42 |
44.15± 0.09 |
134.16± 0.28 |
31.15± 0.63 |
155.75± 0.57 |
3.744 |
III |
Ashwagandharishta-T |
High fatty diet |
2.0 ml/kg |
118.46±0.54 *** |
52.53± 0.14*** |
45.53± 0.43*** |
20.12± 0.42*** |
100.60± 0.27*** |
1.249 |
IV |
Ashwagandharishta-M |
High fatty diet |
2.0 ml/kg |
120.17±0.62*** |
52.45± 0.07*** |
47.16± 0.37*** |
20.51± 0.24*** |
102.55± 0.34*** |
1.290 |
V |
Atorvastatin ( Standard) |
High fatty diet |
1.2 mg/kg |
115.70±0.73*** |
54.52± 0.12*** |
42.15± 0.54*** |
19.28± 0.34*** |
96.40± 0.81*** |
1.126 |
All values are expressed as Mean ± SEM, n = 6, ***p < 0.001 vs Control group
A rise in LDL may cause deposition of cholesterol in the arteries and aorta and hence it is a direct risk factor for coronary heart disease. LDL carries cholesterol from the liver to the peripheral cells and smooth muscle cells of the arteries22.
HDL promotes the removal of cholesterol from peripheral cells and facilitates its delivery back to the liver. Therefore, increased levels of HDL are desirable. On the contrary, high levels of VLDL and LDL promote arteriosclerosis. LDL, especially in its oxidized form, is taken up by macrophages via a scavenger mechanism. Therefore, anti-arteriosclerotic drugs should reduce VLDL and LDL and/or elevate HDL.The search for hypolipidemic drugs follows that high level of serum cholesterol is associated with an increased incidence of coronary heart diseases. Reduction in LDL cholesterol and increase in HDL cholesterol concentration are significantly related to lipid lowering therapy23.
In the present study, Ashwagandharishta- T and M resulted significant reduction in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol level. A significant fall in HDL cholesterol to total cholesterol ratio was observed in Group II (high fat diet treated rats). Low level of HDL cholesterol is associated with high risk of coronary artery disease24. The decrease in serum triglyceride level and reduction in atherogenic index in Ashwagandharishta treated groups is an important finding of this experiment. Most of the hypolipidemic drugs do not decrease serum triglycerides level but both types of Ashwagandharishta showed significant decrease in serum triglyceride. Reverse back of atherogenic index provides strong additional benefits in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis.
REFERENCES:
1. Tripathi. KD.Essentials of Medical Pharmacology. 4th Edn. Published by Jaypee Brothers. New Delhi.2002; 612-614
2. Singh N, Kapur KK and Singh SP. Mechanism of cardiovascular action of Terminalia arjuna.Journal of Medicinal Plant Research.1982 ; 45:102-104
3. The Ayurvedic Formulary of India Part-II. Controller of Publications, Delhi, 2000;.8-9
4. Kokate CK, Purohit AP and Gokhale SB.Pharmacognosy.39th Edition , Nirali Prakashan, Pune,2007;604-606
5. Andallu B and Radhika B. Hypoglycemic, Diuretic and Hypocholesterolemic effect of Winter Cherry (Withania somnifera, Dunal) root. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology.2000; 38:.607-609
6. Budhiraja RD and Sudhir S. Review of biological Activity of Withanolides. Journal of science and Industrial Research. 1987; 46:488
7. Rahman Z, Kohli K, Khar RK, Lamba HS, Rathore A and Pahwa R. An overview of Terminalia arjuna; Chemistry and pharmacological profile. Indian Drugs. 2004; 641-648
8. The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India Part- I, Vol.I . First Edn.Government of India, Controller of Publication. Delhi. 1990;45-48,113-116,127-128
9. Nadkarni AK. Indian Material Medica. Vol.II. Third Revised Edition. Popular Prakashan Ltd. Mumbai. 1982; 411-412, 428-429, 582-584
10. Jadhav PD and Laddha KS. Estimation of Gallic acid and Ellagic acid from Terminalia chebula Retz. Indian Drugs. 2004; 41(4) :200-206
11. Tuba AK and Ilhami Gulchin. Antioxidant and radical scavenging properties of curcumin. Chemico Biological Interactions. 2008; 174: 27-37
12. Bagul M, Srinivisa H, Anandjiwala S and Rajani M . Phytochemical Evaluation and Free radical Scavenging Activity of Nagakesara ( Stamen of Messua ferrea).Indian Drugs.2006; 43(8);665-670
13. Mishra Siddhinandan. Bhaisazya Kalpana Vigyan, Chaukambha Bharati Prakashan. Varanasi.2005; 253-254
14. Alam Muzzafar, Radhamani S, Ali usman and Purushottam KK. Microbiological Screening of Dhataki Flowers. Journal of Research in Ayurveda and Siddha. 1984; 2(4):371-375
15. Braugghler JM, Duncan CA and Chase IR. . The involvement of iron in lipid peroxidation..Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1986:261(22): 10282-89.
16. Lowery OH, Rosenbrough NJ, Farr AL and Randall RJ. Protein estimation with Folin phenol reagent. Biological Chemistry. 1951:193:265-275.
17. Khanna AK, Chander R. and Kapoor NK. Terminalia arjuna : an ayurvedic Cardiotonic, Regulates Lipid Metabolism in Hyperlipaemic Rats . Phytotherapy Research. 1996: 10: 663-665.
18. Allain CC, Poon LS, Chan CS, Richmond W and Fu PC. Enzymatic Determination of Total Serum cholesterol. Clinical Chemistry 1974; 20:447-475.
19. Friedewald WT, Levy RI and Fredrickson DS .Estimation of concentration of Low Density Cholesterol in plasma without use of ultracentrifuge. Journal of Clinical Chemistry. 1972; 18: 449-502.
20. Muller PH, Schmulling RM, Liebich HM and Eggstein M .A fully Enzymatic Triglyceride Determination. Journal of Clinical Chemistry 1977; 15:457-464.
21. Bhattacharya SK, Satyam KS and Ghosal S .Antioxidant activity of glycowithanolides from Withania somnifera. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology. 1997; 35: 236-239
22. Pederson T.R, Pro and Con. Low- density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering is and will be the key to the future of lipid management. American Journal of Cardiology. 2001: 87(5A): 8B-12B.
23. Boden WE and Pearson TA. Raising low levels of High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol is an important target of therapy. American Journal of cardiology.2000; 85(5):645-650.
24. Godkar PB, Narayanan P and Bhide SV. Hypocholesterolemic effect of Turmeric extract on Swiss mice. Indian Journal of Pharmacology.1996; 28:171-174
Received on 05.01.2010 Modified on 10.02.2010
Accepted on 20.03.2010 © AJRC All right reserved
Asian J. Research Chem. 3(3): July- Sept. 2010; Page 574-577