Method Development and Validation of Ramipril and Amlodipine Besylate by RP-HPLC.
N.I. Kochar*, M.N. Dahake, R.L. Bakal, A.P. Devani and A.V.Chandewar
Department of Quality Assurance, P.W. College of Pharmacy, Dhamangaon Road, Yavatmal. 445001
Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, Amravati, Maharashtra State, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: nitinkochar@hotmail.com
ABSTRACT:
A simple isocratic RP-HPLC method has been developed and subsequently validated for the determination of Ramipril and Amlodipine Besylate in pharmaceutical dosage forms within very short retention time. The method employs an Xterra C18 column, 5 μ, 150 mm x 4.60 mm id with flow rate of 1.5 ml/min using UV detection at 210nm. The separation was carried out using a mobile phase consisting of Sodium Lauryl Sulfate buffer by adjusting pH 2.5 and final composition is Buffer: Acetonitrile: Methanol (45:16.5:38.5)V/V. The retention time for Ramipril and Amlodipine Besylate was found to be 3.1 minutes and 3.8 minutes respectively. The results of analysis were validated statically and by recovery studies. Hence the proposed method was found to be accurate, precise, reproducible and specific and can be used for simultaneous analysis of these drugs in tablet formulation.
KEYWORDS: RP-HPLC, Sodium Lauryl Sulfate buffer, Ramipril, Amlodipine Besylate.
INTRODUCTION:
Ramipril is (2S, 3aS, 6aS)-1-[(2S)-2-{[(2S)-1-ethoxy-1-oxo-4-phenylbutan-2-yl]amino}propanoyl]-octahydrocyclopenta[b]pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid, is a long acting ACE inhibitor and Amlodipine Besylate is 3-Ethyl 5-methyl (±)-2-[(2-aminoethoxy)methyl]-4-(o-chlorophenyl)-1,4-dihydro-6-methyl-3,5-pyridinedicarboxylate, monobenzenesulfonate, is a calcium channel antagonist.1,2,3
There are many analytical methods like UV, HPLC, HPTLC available for the quantization of Ramipril and Amlodipine Besylate individually as well as with other combinations.4-13 But HPLC method for combination of Ramipril And Amlodipine Besylate was not reported. The purpose of this study was the development of a simple isocratic RP-HPLC method with ultraviolet detection for Ramipril and Amlodipine Besylate assay in tablets and validates the same as per the ICH guidelines.
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
HPLC grade acetonitrile, methanol and reagent grade hydrochloric acid, ortho -phosphoric acid, sodium lauryl sulphate and triethyl amine were purchased from Merck Ltd. Distilled water obtained from Merck Ltd. was used to prepare the mobile phase and standard solutions. The tablets containing combination of Ramipril (10mg) and Amlodipine Besylate (10mg) were procured from market.
The development and validation of the assay was performed on a HPLC system consisting of thermo separation quaternary gradient with UV detector using Data Ace software.
The analytical column used to achieve chromatographic separation was Xterra C18 column, 5 μ, 150 mm x 4.6 mm id.
For mobile phase, Buffer was made using 1 gm sodium lauryl sulfate added to 1000ml ultrapure water. 7 ml of triethyl amine was added and pH was adjusted to 2.5 by ortho-phosphoric acid. The final composition of mobile phase was Buffer: Acetonitrile: Methanol (45:16.5:38.5) V/V.
Injection volume was 10µl with flow rate of 1.5 ml/minute by keeping column temperature ambient. Scans for the drugs were carried on the UV detector for the elucidation of the lambda max of the drug. Two wavelengths were selected for analysis at 210 and 237nm, which are, reported lambda max of Ramipril and Amlodipine Besylate. On overlay it was observed that 210nm is the ideal wavelength for the method.
For diluents, 200 ml of 0.1 N Hydrochloric acid was mixed with 800ml of methanol and sonicated for 10 minutes with degassing.
Fig.1: Structure of Ramipril
Fig.2: Structure of Amlodipine Besylate
Linearity curves were constructed by plotting Concentrations against Area and regression equations were computed for both the drugs. The plots for Ramipril and Amlodipine Besylate were found to be linear in the range of 70 ppm to 420 ppm for Amlodipine Besylate and 50 ppm to 300 ppm for Ramipril with correlation coefficient 1 for Ramipril as well as Amlodipine Besylate.
Ten tablets of 10 mg strength were weighed and taken into 500 ml volumetric flask. To this about 250 ml of diluent was added and flask were shaken to disintegrate the tablets and sonicated for 10 minutes and finally volume was made with diluent. This solution was centrifuged at 3000 RPM for 10 minutes. The above solution was then filtered through 0.45 μ PVDA filter.
Analysis of formulations:
Commercial formulation of Ramipril and Amlodipine Besylate (Ramipril 10mg & Amlodipine Besylate 10mg) were selected for analysis. Sample preparations were done as per the procedure given for pure samples of Ramipril and Amlodipine Besylate and analyzed. Analysis was done with six replicates and injected into system and data were observed.
Accuracy studies:
Accuracy of proposed method was established by recovery experiment. This study was performed by addition of known amount of standard drug solution of Ramipril and Amlodipine Besylate to preanalysed tablet solutions at three different concentration levels (100 μg/ml-300 μg/ml). Resulting solution was reanalyzed by proposed method. Result of recovery studies are Table 1 for Ramipril and table 2 for Amlodipine Besylate.
Table 1: Accuracy for Ramipril
|
Sr. No. |
Amount of Drug added (µg/ml) |
%Recovery*± SD |
%RSD |
|
1 |
100 |
100.53 ± 0.78 |
0.78 |
|
2 |
200 |
99.82 ± 0.34 |
0.35 |
|
3 |
300 |
99.51 ± 0.62 |
0.63 |
*mean of three estimation at each level.
Table 2: Accuracy for Amlodipine Besylate
|
Sr. No. |
Amount of Drug added (µg/ml) |
%Recovery*± SD |
%RSD |
|
1 |
100 |
99.71 ± 0.71 |
0.71 |
|
2 |
200 |
99.42 ± 0.12 |
0.12 |
|
3 |
300 |
99.51 ± 0.72 |
0.73 |
*mean of three estimation at each level.
System suitability
For chromatographic separation following system suitability tests were done: Tailing factor, resolution, asymmetry and theoretical plates. The system suitability method acceptance criteria set in each validation run were: Resolution > 2.0, tailing factor ≤ 2.0, asymmetry ≤ 2.0 and theoretical plates > 2000. In all the analyte peak area for two consecutive injections was < 2.0%.
Fig.3: Chromatogram of Standard Preparation
Fig 4: Chromatogram of Test Preparation
Table 3: Linearity of Amlodipine Besylate
|
Level No.
|
Concentration (ppm) |
Peak Area |
Coefficient of Regression |
Constant of Regression |
Correlation Coefficient |
|
1 |
70 |
718220 |
1041 |
12479 |
1 |
|
2 |
140 |
1439758 |
|||
|
3 |
210 |
2178358 |
|||
|
4 |
280 |
2887774 |
|||
|
5 |
350 |
3633717 |
|||
|
6 |
420 |
4356294 |
Table 4: Linearity of Ramipril
|
Level No.
|
Concentration (ppm) |
Peak Area |
Coefficient of Regression |
Constant of Regression |
Correlation Coefficient |
|
1 |
50 |
926435 |
18769 |
18136 |
1 |
|
2 |
100 |
1852166 |
|||
|
3 |
150 |
2806386 |
|||
|
4 |
200 |
3717446 |
|||
|
5 |
250 |
4678056 |
|||
|
6 |
300 |
5617687 |
Linearity and Range:
A study was conducted to demonstrate the linearity of detector response for Ramipril and Amlodipine Besylate with respect to concentrations. Six solutions were prepared from 25% to 150% of the target concentration. Linearity of Detector Response was established by plotting a graph of peak area versus concentration and correlation of co-efficient was determined.
For Ramipril, linearity curve was obtained using 50-300 µg/ml concentration and for Amlodipine Besylate, linearity curve was obtained using 70-420 µg/ml concentration.
Fig 3: Linearity Plot for Amlodipine Besylate
Fig 4: Linearity Plot for Ramiril
Precision:
Precision of test method is demonstrated by analyzing six samples prepared as per test method for 10/10 mg strength tablets. Assay values and RSD of assay results were calculated. The assay method precision acceptance criteria set in the validation was R.S.D ≤ 2.0%.
The results are summarized as follows:
Table 5: Precision
|
Preparation No. |
% Assay |
|
|
Ramipril |
Amlodipine Besylate |
|
|
1 |
99.2 |
98.3 |
|
2 |
99.4 |
98.5 |
|
3 |
99.3 |
98.3 |
|
4 |
99.6 |
98.4 |
|
5 |
99.7 |
98.7 |
|
6 |
99.6 |
98.7 |
|
MEAN |
99.4 |
98.4 |
|
% RSD |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Robustness
Typical variations in high performance liquid chromatography conditions were used to evaluate the robustness of the assay method. In this study, the chromatographic parameters monitored were retention time, area, capacity factor, tailing factor and theoretical plates. The robustness acceptance criteria were found to be in range.
In Robustness, different parameters like filter validation, flow rate variation, pH variation and temperature variation were studied. During these studies all system suitability parameters were found to be in range.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
All the system suitability parameters were optimized to obtain best resolution between multi-component formulations. Xterra column (150mm X 4.60mm) having particle size 5 μ and bonded phase octadecylsilane (C-18) were optimized with following conditions.
Chromatographic Condition For assay method:
Table 6: Chromatographic Condition For assay method
|
Equipment |
Liquid chromatograph equipped with UV detector |
|
Column |
Xterra C-18 (150x4.6mm, 5 µm) |
|
Column temperature |
Ambient |
|
Flow rate |
1.5 ml/minute |
|
Detection Wavelength |
210 nm |
|
Injection volume |
10 µl |
|
Run time |
5 minutes |
|
Mobile Phase |
Buffer: Acetonitrile: Methanol (45:16.5:38.5) |
|
Approx. RT |
Ramipril: 3.14 min., Amlodipine Besylate: 3.82 min. |
Linearity was observed by linear regression equation method for Ramipril and Amlodipine Besylate in different concentration range. The correlation coefficient of these drugs was formed to be 1.0, indicating good linearity. The developed HPLC method was validated for simultaneous estimation of Ramipril and Amlodipine Besylate using linearity, range, accuracy and precision. The %RSD for all parameters was found to be less than two, which indicates the validity of method and assay results obtained by this method were in fair agreement. Analysis of the results shown that the results obtained by various methods do not differ significantly and are quite comparable to the label claim of the formulations.
REFERENCES:
1. www.wikipedia.org
2. USP32–NF27 ,Page 3474
3. USP32–NF27 ,Page 4216
4. Belal F, Al-Zaagi IA, Gadkariem EA, Abounassif MA. A stability-indicating LC method for the simultaneous determination of ramipril and hydrochlorothiazide in dosage forms. J Pharm and Biom Anal;2001: 24335–342.
5. Jawla S, Jeyalakshmi K, Krishnamurthy T, Kumar Y. Development and Validation of Simultaneous HPLC method for Estimation of Telmisartan and Ramipril in Pharmaceutical Formulations. Int J PharmTech Res;2010:2:1625-1633.
6. Patel VA, Patel PG, Chaudhary BG, Rajgor NB, Rathi SG. Development and Validation of HPTLC Method for the Simultaneous Estimation of Telmisartan and Ramipril in Combined Dosage Form. Int J Pharm and Bio Res;2010:1:18-24.
7. Potale LV, Damle MC, Khodke AS, Bothara KG. A Validated Stability Indicating HPTLC Method For Simultaneous Estimation Of Ramipril And Telmisartan. Int J Pharma Sci Rev and Res;2010:2(Issue 2):35-39.
8. Dhabale PN, Burade KB, Hosmani AH, Gonjari ID, Rakesh SU, Patil PR. Development and Statistical Validation of UV Spectrophotometric Method for Estimation of Amlodipine Besylate in Tablet Dosage Form. Arch Pharm Sci & Res;2009:1:158-161.
9. Safeer K, Anbarsi B, Senthilkumar N. Analytical Method Development and Validation of Amlodipine and Hydrochlorothiazide in combined dosage form by RP-HPLC. Int J Chem Tech Res;2010:2:21-25.
10. Saravanan C, Srinivasan S, Narayanaswamy VB, Suresh S, Sivakumar T. Analytical Method Development And Validation Of Amlodipine Besylate And Losartan Potassium In Tablet Dosage Form By RP-HPLC Method, Int J Pharm Sci;2010:2:(Issue 3):822-826.
11. Rao P, Rahaman SA, Prasad R, Reddy P. RP-HPLC Method Of Simultaneous Estimation Of Amlodipine Besylate And Metoprolol In Combined Dosage Form. Int J Pharm Res D;2010:2:(Issue 9):69-76.
12. Chitlange SS, Bagri K, Sakarkar DM. Stability Indicating RP- HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Valsartan and Amlodipine in Capsule Formulation. Asian J Res Chem;2008:1(Issue 1):15-18
13. Patil PR, Dhabale PN, Burade KB, Simultaneous Estimation of Ramipril and Amlodipine by UV Spectrophotometric method. Res J Pharm and Tech;2009:2:(Issue 2):304-307
Received on 29.04.2011 Modified on 12.10.2011
Accepted on 23.10.2011 © AJRC All right reserved
Asian J. Research Chem. 4(12): Dec., 2011; Page 1829-1832