Reverse Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatographic Method for the Simultaneous Estimation of Amoxicillin Trihydrate and Tinidazole in the Tablet Dosage Form

 

Bojaraju V., Sireesha D., Mahesh Nasare, V.V.L.N. Prasad and  PrakashV. Diwan.

Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Quality assurance, Lalitha College of Pharmacy, Venkatapur (V), Ghatkesar (M), R.R Dist., A.P.-501301

*Corresponding Author E-mail:

 

ABSTRACT:

A simple, rapid and selective RP -HPLC method has been developed for determination of Amoxicillin trihydrate and Tinidazole in the pharmaceutical dosage form. The  chromatographic separation  was achieved with  reverse phase phenomenex ®  (Luna 5µ C18(2) 100A (250 × 4.60 mm) Column  in isocratic mode and  mobile phase containing 25mM Potassium dihydrogen  phosphate  (adjusted to pH 4.5 by Ortho-phosphoric acid) and  Acetonitrile in the ratio of 40:60 % v/v. The flow rate was 1mL min-1 and effluent was monitored at 238 nm. Retention time was found to be 2.053 min for Amoxicillin trihydrate and  2.944 min  for Tinidazole , respectively. Linear regression analysis data for the calibration plot showed that there was good linear relationship between response and concentration in the range of 5-50 µg/ml for both Amoxicillin trihydrate and Tinidazole , respectively. Percentage recoveries obtained for Amoxicillin trihydrate and Tinidazole were 100.87%  and  99.52% respectively. The proposed method is precise, accurate, selective and rapid for the simultaneous determination of Amoxicillin trihydrate and Tinidazole in pharmaceutical dosage forms.

 

KEYWORDS: Amoxicillin trihydrate, Tinidazole , RP-HPLC Method, Validation, Simultaneous estimation.

 


INTRODUCTION:

Amoxicillin is chemically (2S.5R.6R)-6-{[(2R)-2-amino-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-acetyl] amino}-3, 3-dimethyl-7-oxo-4-thia-l-azabicyclo[3.2.0] heptane-2-carboxylic acid[1]. Amoxicillin is amino Penicillin with spectrum similar to that of Ampicillin [2]. Amoxicillin is a moderate–spectrum bacteriolytic β-lactum antibiotic used to treat bacterial infections caused by susceptible micro organisms. It is usually the drug of choice within the class because it is better absorbed following oral administration. Amoxicillin acts by inhibiting the synthesis of bacterial cell wall[3]. It is official drug in Indian Pharmacopoeia [4], British Pharmacopoeia[5]. The molecular formula is C16H19N3O5S and Molecular weight is 365.1 g/mol[6].

 

Fig-1: Structure of Amoxicillin

 

Tinidazole is chemically 1(2 Ethyl Sulfonyl Ethyl) –2 – methyl – 5nitroimidozole [7].Tinidazole is a prodrug and antiprotozoal agent. The nitro group of tinidazole is reduced in Trichomonas by a ferredoxin-mediated electron transport system and used for Metronidazole-Resistant Vaginal Trichomoniasis[8]. The free nitro radical generated as a result of this reduction is believed to be responsible for the antiprotozoal activity. It is suggested that the toxic free radicals covalently bind to DNA, causing DNA damage and leading to cell death[9]. Tinidazole  is the subject of monograph in each of the BP and the USP. British Pharmacopoeia [10] describes the non-aqueous titration method using perchloric acid as titrant and malachite green as indicator for the assay of tinidazole. The molecular formula is C8H13N3O4S and Molecular weight is 247.2 g/mol [11].Both the drugs are used to treat Gastro intestinal infectious diseases and upper respiratory tract infections.

 

Fig 2: Structure of Tinidazole

 

Literature survey revealed that a number of methods have been reported for estimation of  Amoxicillin[12-20]  and Tinidazole[21-27]  individually or in combination with other drugs.Only one spectophotometric method[28] and one LC estimation[29]  method have been  reported for the quantitative  estimation of Amoxicillin trihydrate and tinidazole in pharmaceutical dosage form.  Hence an attempt has been made to develop new HPLC method which is simple, rapid, reproducible and economical method for simultaneous estimation of Amoxicillin trihydrate and Tinidazole in tablet dosage form. This method has been successfully used for quality-control analysis of drugs and for other analytical purposes.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

Chemicals

Standard bulk drug samples of Amoxicillin and tinidazole were provided by Drugs India private Ltd (Hyderabad, India). Pharmaceutical dosage form used in this study was TINIMOX® labeled to contain 500 mg of Amoxicillin trihydrate and 300mg of Tinidazole (manufactured by Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Hyderabad, India). Acetonitrile (HPLC grade) and ortho phosphoric acid was obtained from Merck Specialties Private limited, Mumbai, India. Water (HPLC grade) was obtained from milliQ system; Potassium dihyrdrogen ortho phosphate purified was obtained from S.D. Fine Chemicals Ltd, Mumbai, India.

 

Instrumentation and chromatographic conditions

HPLC method development and validation was done on a Shimadzu (Japan) Liquid chromatograph equipped with (LC-20 AD pump), LC-20A UV/Vis detector, (Rheodyne) 7725i injector with 20µl loop and LC-Solutions software. Stationary phase used was Luna 5µ C18 (2) 100A 250 × 4.60mm Column. Membrane filter of size 0.45µ (Rankem Nylon membranes, New Delhi, India) was used. All weighing were done on Shimadzu electronic balance, BL-220 H (Shimadzu Corporation, Japan).

 

Preparation of mobile phase

Acetonitrile : 25mM Potassium dihydrogen  phosphate  (adjusted to pH 4.5 by Ortho-phosphoric acid (10% aqueous) (60:40 v/v)was prepared, filtered through 0.45 μm membrane filter and sonicated on ultra sonic bath.

 

Preparation of Standard Stock Solution

The standard stock solution 1mg/ml of Amoxicillin trihydrate and Tinidazole were prepared separately by dissolving 10 mg of each drug in 100 ml mixture of acetonitrile and water (60:40 v/v). From the standard stock solution, mixed standard solution was prepared to contain 100 µg/mL of Amoxicillin trihydrate and 100 µg/mL of Tinidazole.

 

Preparation of sample solution

Twenty tablets were weighed and powder equivalent to 10 mg of Amoxicillin trihydrate was weighed accurately and transferred to a 100ml volumetric flask and extracted with mixture of Acetonitrile and water (60:40 v/v).  The combined extracts were filtered and transferred to a volumetric flask and the volume adjusted to 100 ml with Acetonitrile and water. From this solution, 3 ml was pipetted and transferred to 10 ml volumetric flask and made volume upto the mark with acetonitrile and water to get the concentration 30µg/ml of Amoxicillin trihydrate and 30 µg/ml of Tinidazole.

 

Validation of HPLC method

The method was validated for the parameters like system suitability, specificity, linearity, accuracy precision, robustness, LOD and LOQ.

 

System suitability testing was   done   by six replicate analyses of standard solution at a 100% level to verif resolutio and reproducibility of the chromatographic system. Parameters such as theoretical plates, tailing factor were determined and compared against the specifications.

 

For specificity studies standard solutions of AMOX and TZ were injected first. Then solutions containing mixed components, commercial product and excipient solution were run. The chromatograms of Amoxicillin and Tinidazole were analysed for RT and peak area.

 


 

Fig 3: Chromatogram of  standard solution of Amoxicillin trihydrate and Tinidazole

 

Fig 4: Overlain of Amoxicillin trihydrate and Tinidazole standards

 

 


Linearity studies were done by constructing calibration curves of Amoxycillin and Tinidazole standard solutions with concentrations ranging from 5-50 ug/ml each and correlation coefficients were determined.

 

To study accuracy of the method, recovery studies were carried out by addition of  standard drusolution  to sample  at 3 different  levels 50%, 100% and 150othtesconcentration (test concentration is 20µg/ml for Amoxicillin trihydrate and 20 µg/ml for Tinidazole) and the contents were reanalyzed by the proposed method.

 

Precision of the method was checked with respect to repeatability and Ruggudness. The % RSD was determined to evaluate the repeatability. Repeatability was determined by six replicate injections of same standard solution on the same day, under same experimental conditions. Ruggudness was assessed by injecting the same standard solution on different days. The relative standard deviation (% RSD) was determined in order to assess the precision of the method.

 

Robustness of the method was determined by changing the experimental conditions like mobile phase ratio and pH of mobile phase. The mobile phase ratio was changed by ±2 units for both acetonitrile and buffer, pH of mobile phase was changed by 4.5±0.2

 

Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantitation(LOQ) were determined by injecting progressively low concentrations of the standard solutions.

 

LOD and LOQ were calculated using following formulae

        LOD =3.3*F/S

        LOQ =10 *F/S

 

Where

F = Standard deviation of the response

S = Slope of the calibration curve

 

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

Method Development

ThsolutionoAmoxicillitrihydratand Tinidazole working standards were injected into the HPLC system and run in different solvent systems as mobile phases. Different mobile phases containing Acetonitrile, Buffers (Triethanolamine, phosphate) in different proportions were tried and finally Acetonitrile : 25mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate adjusted to pH4.5 with ortho phosphoric acid (60:40 v/v) was selected as an appropriate mobile phase which gave good resolution and acceptable peak parameters for both Amoxicillin trihydrate and Tinidazole. Representative chromatogram of mixed standard of Amoxicillin trihydrate and Tinidazole is shown in Figure 3.

 

From the standard  stock solution  further  dilutions(Amoxicillin trihydrate 30 µg/ml and Tinidazole 30 µg/ml) were  done  using  mobile  phase  and  scanned  over  the range of 200-400 nm and the spectra were overlain. It was observed that at 238 nm both Amoxicillin trihydrate and Tinidazole showed considerable absorbance and therefore it was selected as detection wavelength. Overlain spectra of both drugs are shown in Fig.4.

 

Method Validation

The method was validated as per ICH guidelines [30].

 

System suitability: System suitability tests were carried out to evaluate the reproducibility of the system for the analysis. Table 2 and 3 represents the system suitability results of this method. The system was found to be suitable in respect of theoretical plate count and tailing factor.

 

Specificity: Specificity is the ability of the method to assess the analyte in presence of excipients, impurities,degraded products, matrix etc. peaks from sample solution and mixed srandard solution were found on same time. Excipients did not change the retention times. So the method is specific for simultaneous estimation of Amoxicillin and Tinidazole.

Linearity: The linear relationship was observed between the peak area and concentration over the range of 5-50µg/ml for both the drugs. The method was proven to be linear in the concentration range of 5- 50ug/ml as the correlation coefficient was 0.999 for Amoxicillin trihydrate and 0.999 for Tinidazole. Correlation coefficient, y- intercept, slope of regression line is shown in Figure 5 and 6.

 

Fig 5: Calibration Curve for Amoxicillin trihydrate

 

Fig 6: Calibration Curve for Tinidazole

 

Table 1: Optimized Chromatographic Conditions

Parameters

Method

Stationary phase (Column)

Phenomenex®  (Luna 5µ C18(2) 100A (250 × 4.60 mm) Column

Mobile phase

25mM Potassium dihydrogen  phosphate  (adjusted to pH 4.5 by Ortho-phosphoric acid) and  Acetonitrile in the ratio of 40:60 % v/v

Flow rate

1 ml/min

Pressure

110 kgf

Run time

5 min

Column temperature(0c)

Ambient

Detection wavelength (nm)

238

Drugs Retention time (min)

Amoxicillin trihydrate

Tinidazole

 

2.052 ± 0.14

2.942 ±  0.10

Accuracy: Accuracy is generally assessed by analyzing the samples with known concentration and comparing the measured value with the true value. The measure values were obtained by conducting recovery studies. % recoveries are shown in Table 8.

 

Precision: The method was found to be precise as % RSD values for both repeatability and ruggudness were less than 2. The results of precision are given in Table 4 and 5.

Robustness: Robustness studies were carried out after deliberate alterations of mobile phase compositions and mobile phase pH. It was observed that the small changes in these operational parameters, did not lead to changes of retention times of peak of interest. Result of robustness studies are shown in Table 6 and 7.

 

Analysis of Marketed Products: The proposed method was evaluated in the assay of tablet formulation containing Amoxicillin trihydrate and Tinidazole. Five replicate determinations were carried out and % assay found was 98.60 -101.85 for Amoxicillin trihydrate and 99.60-100.60 % for Tinidazole. Results of tablet analysis are shown in Table 9.

 

Table 2: System suitability parameters for Amoxicillin trihydrate

S.No.

RT

Area

USP Plate count

USP Tailing

1

2.045

837040

3421.260

1.388

2

2.044

834617

3334.017

1.384

3

2.045

834524

3349.321

1.385

4

2.043

837656

3459.209

1.390

5

2.047

837562

3432.664

1.391

Mean

 

836280

 

 

SD

 

1517

 

 

% RSD

 

0.18

 

 

 

Table 3: System suitability parameters for Tinidazole

S. No.

RT

Area

USP Plate count

USP Tailing

1

2.935

615412

6567.838

1.404

2

2.937

612720

6800.499

1.401

3

2.939

615977

6490.672

1.398

4

2.942

618022

6545.286

1.401

5

2.933

613264

6527.171

1.401

Mean

 

615079

 

 

SD

 

2146

 

 

% RSD

 

0.34

 

 

 

Table 4: Repeatability (Intraday Precision)

S. No

Concentration

Peak area

Amoxicillin

trihydrate

Tinidazole

Amoxicillin

trihydrate

Tinidazole

 

 

 

   1

30

25

834512

538442

30

25

837726

537768

30

25

834052

538486

30

25

829526

539018

30

25

827483

534306

30

25

837625

538648

% RSD

 

0.53

0.32

 

 


Table 5: Ruggudness (Interday Precision) 

S. No

Concentration

Peak area

Amoxicillin trihydrate

Tinidazole

Amoxicillin trihydrate

Tinidazole

 

 

  1

30

25

805746

515924

30

25

807161

509796

30

25

810133

515856

30

25

806895

525417

30

25

809121

525400

30

25

807692

509974

% RSD

 

0.196

1.32

 

Table 6: Robustness Results for variations in pH.

Parameter

Retention Time

Tailing factor

Amoxicillin trihydrate

Tinidazole

Amoxicillin trihydrate

Tinidazole

pH 4.3

2.052

2.942

1.390

1.401

pH 4.7

2.047

2.937

1.384

1.401

 

Table 7: Robustness Results for variations in Mobile phase.

Parameter

 

Retention Time

Tailing factor

Amoxicillin trihydrate

Tinidazole

Amoxicillin trihydrate

Tinidazole

ACN : buffer  (62  :  38)

2.045

2.935

1.388

1.404

ACN : buffer (58  :  42)

2.048

2.939

1.385

 1.398

 

Table 8: Recovery Studies of Amoxicillin trihydrate and Tinidazole

Drug

 

50%

100 %

150%

Amoxicillin Trihydrate

Mean % recovery

98.62

99.54

101.85

% RSD

1.5

0.53

1.2

Tinidazole

Mean %  recovery

99.62

100.48

100.66

% RSD

0.29

1.3

1.7

 

Table 9: Analysis of Formulation

Drug

Amount(mg/tablet)

%

Label claim

% RSD

Labelled

Estimated

Amoxicillin trihydrate

 500mg

498.16

  99.63

 0.42

Tinidazole

300 mg

302.02

100.67

 0.65

 

 


CONCLUSION:

The method described enables the quantification of Amoxicillin Trihydrate and Tinidazole in combined Tablet dosage form. The validation data demonstrates good precision and accuracy, which proves to be reliable of the proposed method. Hence, this HPLC method can be used routinely for simultaneous estimation of both components in solid oral dosage form.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

The authors are thankful to Drugs India Private Ltd, Hyderabad, India for providing gift samples of Amoxicillin Trihydrate and Tinidazole and also to School of Pharmacy, Anurag Group of Institutions, Hyderabad for giving permission to carry out this work.

 

REFERENCES:

1.     Subhash Chandra Bose, Kotte., Vijaya Kumar. Tulam, Ramakoteswara Rao. Chinta, S. Shriram Raghavan, P.K. Dubey and P.M. Murali, 2012. Qualitative Analysis of, Ampicillin, Cephalexin By Quadrupole –Time of Flight (LCMS) using Electrospray Ionization. International Journal of Chem Tech Research, 4: 855-861.

2.     Rahman S., A. Ahuja, J. Ali and K. Khar, 2004. Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of amoxycillin trihydrate and metronidazole in dental films. Indian J Pharm Sci, 66: 13536.

3.     Suresh Babu G., Manzoor Ahmed and A. Sathish Kumar Shetty, 2011. Development and Validation of Amoxicillin by RP-HPLC Method in Bulk drug and Pharmaceutical dosage forms. International Journal of Chem Tech Research, 3:1037-1041.

4.     Indian Pharmacopoeia, 2003. Ghaziabad, The Indian pharmacopoeia commission.3: 2090

5.     British Pharmacopoeia 2003, Her Majesty’s stationary office. London, 3 :719-21.

6.     http://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB01060.

7.     Khaja Pasha., Asgar Ali, Shahana Bana and Syeda Humair, 2010. Reverse phase – HPLC method for the analysis of tinidazole in pharmaceutical dosage form & bulk drug. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2: 2

8.     Sobel J.D., P. Nyirjesy and W. Brown, 2001. Tinidazole therapy for metronidazole- resistant trichomoniasis, Clin. Infect. Dis., 33: 1341–6.

9.     David R. Hill. and Timothy B. Gardner, 2001. Treatment of Giardiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001 January; 14: 14–128.

10.   British Pharmacopoeia Vol. III, United Kingdom: The Stationary office on the behalf of MHRA, 2009, 2037.

11.   http://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB00911

12.   Bobrowska G.E., 2001. Determination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid in some pharmaceutical preparations by derivative spectrophotometry. Mikrochim Acta, 136: 3134.

13.   Mascher J.H. and C. Kikuta, 1998. Determination of Amoxicillin in Human Serum and Plasma by High Performance Liquid Chromatography and Online Post Column Derivatisation. J Chromagr A, 812: 22126.

14.   Abreu L.R. and R.A. Ortiz, 2003. HPLC determination of amoxicillin comparative bioavailability in healthy volunteers after a single dose administration. J Pharm Sci, 6: 223230.

15.   Yuan Z., H.Q. Russlie and D.M. Canafax, 1997. High Performance Liquid Chromatographic Analysis of Amoxycillin in Human and Chinchilla Plasma, Middle Ear Fluid and Whole Blood. J Chromatogr B, 692:36166.

16.   Zarapkar S.S. and S.H. Rane, 2000. Reverse phase high performance liquid chromatographic determination of amoxicillin and ambroxol hydrochloride in tablets. Indian Drugs, 37:246250.

17.   Zarapkar S.S., S.S. Kolte and N.P. Bhandari, 1998. High performance liquid chromatographic determination of amoxicillin trihydrate and probenicid simultaneously from pharmaceutical preparation. Indian Drugs, 35: 107109.

18.   Wibawa J.I.D., D. Fowkes, P.N. Shaw and D.A. Barrett, 2002. Measurement Of Amoxicillin In Plasma And Gastric Samples Using High Performance Liquid Chromatography With Flurimetric Detection J Chromatogr B, 774:141148.

19.   Menelaou A., A.A. Soxmogyi, M.L. Barclay and F. Bochner, 1999. Simultaneous quantification of amoxicillin and metrinidazole in plasma using high performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection. J Chromatogr B Appl, 731:261266.

20.   Qureshi S.Z., T. Qayoom and M.I. Helalet, 1999. Simultaneous spectrophotometric and voltametric determinations of amoxicillin, ampicillin and cloxacillin in drug formulations: reaction mechanism in the base catalyzed hydrolysis followed by oxidation with iodate in dilute acid solution. J Pharm Biomed Anal, 21: 473482.

21.   Panzade P.D. and K.R. Mahadik, 2001. Simultaneous estimation of ofloxacin and tinidazole in tablet dosage form, Indian Drugs, 38: 368–370.

22.   Bombale M.V., S.S. Kadam and S.R. Dhaneshwar, 1997. Estimation of Ciprofloxacin and Tinidazole from a combined dosage form by spectrophotometry, Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 59: 265 – 268.

23.   Krishnaiah Y.S.R., S.A. Devi, Y.I. Muzib, R.S. Karthikeyan and V. Satyanarayana, 2002. Estimation of Tinidazole in pharmaceutical dosage forms by reverse phase HPLC, The Antiseptic, 99: 5.

24.   Bhatia M.S., S.G. Kaskhedikar, and S.C. Chaturvedi, 1999. High performance liquid chromatographic estimation of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride and tinidazole from tablets. Indian J. Pharm. Sci, 8: 311.

25.   Salomies H. and J.P. Salo, 2005. An HPLC study of tinidazole. Chromagraphia, 36: 79.

26.   Sorvillo F., L. Smith and P. Kerndt, 2001. Trichomonas vaginalis, HIV and African-Americans. Emerg. Infect. Dis., 7: 927-932.

27.   Salo J.P.K. and H. Salomies, 2003. Two stability-indicating UV spetrophotometric methods for the analysis of hydrolyzed tinidazole. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 31: 523-536.

28.   Daharwal S.J. and S. Saraf, 2007. Spectrophotometric Determination for the Simultaneous Estimation of Amoxicillin and Tinidazole in Tablet Dosage Form. Indian J Pharm Sci, 41: 3541.

29.   Arindam Basu., Nandini Saha and Inder Singh Rawat, 2011. Simultaneous LC Estimation of Amoxycillin and Tinidazole in Tablet Dosage Form. IJPR, 3:45-48.

30.   ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guidelines 1994, code Q2A, Text on validation of Analytical procedure, Step-4, Consensus Guidelines.

 

 

 

 

Received on 17.11.2012         Modified on 14.12.2012

Accepted on 21.12.2012         © AJRC All right reserved

Asian J. Research Chem. 6(1):  January 2013; Page 58-63