Synthesis and Application of Green powder detergents based on Starch, Mixed Glycols and Maleic Anhydride
J.R. Dontulwar
Department of Chemistry, PIET, Nagpur 440019
*Corresponding Author E-mail: jdontulwar@yahoo.co.in
ABSTRACT:
Various Ecofriendly Polymer Detergents formulated using Starch, Sorbitol, and Maleic Anhydride as raw material. The formulations U1 to U 4 were formulated using least proportion of Sodium Tripolyphosphate, Sodium Lauryl Sulphate and acid slurry which are used in excess commercial samples leading to pollution. All these samples had shown excellent performance in terms of surface tension reduction, foam volume and percent detergency.
KEYWORDS:
The Starch, mixed glycols and maleic anhydride polymer was synthesized using simple method.1 The starch and mixed glycol based polymer was found to be ecofriendly in nature and shows BOD to COD ratio 0.5976.2
The hydrophilic liphophilic balance of the polymer was found to be 11.88 indicating its usability for detergent formulation2. Various powder detergents were formulated using an ecofriendly polymer which was discussed earlier3.
The formulated ecofriendly powder detergents U1 to U 4 have shown excellent performance in terms of surface tension, foam volume, percent detergency.
Table1 Synthesis of Polymer Based on Starch, Sorbitol, Glycerol, Maleic Anhydride.
|
Raw Material |
Batch 14 (%) |
|
Starch |
30.76 |
|
Sorbitol |
26.92 |
|
Glycerol |
26.92 |
|
Maleic Anhydride |
15.38 |
Table2Composition of Powder Detergents of Polymer 14 (Composition % by Weight)
|
RAW MATERIALS |
U1 |
U2 |
U3 |
U4 |
|
Polymer (100%) |
4.464 |
8.92 |
13.39 |
17.85 |
|
Acid Slurry (100%) |
4.464 |
8.92 |
13.39 |
17.85 |
|
Sodium Carbonate |
65.71 |
59.82 |
47032 |
38.39 |
|
Ethylene Diamine.Tetraacetic.Acid. |
1.785 |
1.785 |
1.785 |
1.785 |
|
Sodium tripolyphosphate |
8.92 |
8.92 |
8.92 |
8.92 |
|
Sodium Lauryl Sulphate |
1.785 |
1.785 |
1.785 |
1.785 |
|
Sodium Lauryl Ether Sulphate. |
1.785 |
1.785 |
1.785 |
1.785 |
|
Carboxy Methyl Cellulose. |
0.446 |
0.446 |
0.446 |
0.446 |
|
water |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
Note: Polymer Was Used As A Solution In Water (74%Solid)
Acid Slurry Was Used As A Solution In Water (84%Solid
Table3 Physicochemical Properties of powder Detergents (Polymer 14)
|
Sr. No. |
Sample |
pH Value |
Moisture Content |
|
1 |
U1 |
7.55 |
7 % |
|
2 |
U2 |
8.33 |
7.25 % |
|
3 |
U3 |
9.22 |
8.00 % |
|
4 |
U4 |
9.66 |
8.4 % |
Table4 Study of Surface Tension of Water at Various Concentration of Detergent
|
Sample |
Concentration |
S.T.in dynes/cm |
%reduction in S.T. of water |
|
U1 |
0.1 |
34.90 |
50.96 |
|
0.25 |
31.86 |
55.24 |
|
|
0.5 |
28.47 |
60.00 |
|
|
1 |
26.38 |
62.93 |
|
|
U2 |
0.1 |
33.17 |
53.39 |
|
0.25 |
30.42 |
57.26 |
|
|
0.5 |
27.48 |
61.39 |
|
|
1 |
24.32 |
65.83 |
|
|
U3 |
0.1 |
31.10 |
56.30 |
|
0.25 |
27.10 |
61.92 |
|
|
0.5 |
24.98 |
64.90 |
|
|
1 |
23.15 |
67.47 |
|
|
U4 |
0.1 |
30.10 |
57.71 |
|
0.25 |
26.49 |
62.78 |
|
|
0.5 |
21.54 |
69.73 |
|
|
1 |
16.33 |
77.05 |
|
|
Surf excel |
0.1 |
46.42 |
35.61 |
|
0.25 |
42.66 |
40.83 |
|
|
0.5 |
32.95 |
54.29 |
|
|
1 |
22.85 |
67.89 |
Table 5 Study of Foam Volume At 0.1 % Concentration of Detergent
|
SR.NO. |
SAMPLE |
FOAM VOLUME IN CM3 |
||||
|
TIME IN MIN |
||||||
|
0 |
5 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
||
|
1 |
U1 |
80 |
70 |
70 |
70 |
70 |
|
2 |
U2 |
100 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
|
3 |
U3 |
160 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
|
4 |
U4 |
240 |
230 |
230 |
230 |
230 |
|
5 |
Surf excel |
80 |
80 |
70 |
70 |
70 |
Table 6 Study of Foam Volume At 0.25%Concentration of Detergent
|
SR.NO. |
SAMPLE |
FOAM VOLUME IN CM3 |
||||
|
TIME IN MIN |
||||||
|
0 |
5 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
||
|
1 |
U1 |
120 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
2 |
U2 |
140 |
120 |
120 |
120 |
120 |
|
3 |
U3 |
230 |
230 |
230 |
230 |
230 |
|
4 |
U4 |
380 |
380 |
380 |
380 |
380 |
|
5 |
Surf excel |
150 |
150 |
140 |
140 |
140 |
Table 7 Study of Percent Detergency at Different Concentration on Soil Stained Cotton Cloth
Ro=Reflectance Measured On Clean Cotton Cloth=80.1
Rs=Reflectance Measured On Soiled Cotton Cloth=22
Rw=Reflectance Measured On Washed Cotton Cloth.
|
SR.NO. |
SAMPLE |
CONCENTRATION |
% DETERGENCY |
|
1 |
U1 |
01 |
67.95 |
|
0.25 |
77.74 |
||
|
2 |
U2 |
0.1 |
75.85 |
|
0.25 |
88.40 |
||
|
3 |
U3 |
0.1 |
83.07 |
|
0.25 |
92.70 |
||
|
4 |
U4 |
0.1 |
85.82 |
|
0.25 |
96.83 |
||
|
7 |
Surf excel |
0.1 |
76.49 |
|
0.25 |
80.26 |
Table 8Study of Percent Detergency at Different Concentration on Tea Stained Cotton Cloth
Ro=Reflectance Measured On Clean Cotton Cloth=80.1
Rs=Reflectance Measured On Tea cotton Cloth=33
Rw=Reflectance Measured On Washed Cotton Cloth
|
SR.NO. |
SAMPLE |
CONCENTRATION |
% DETERGENCY |
|
1 |
U1 |
01 |
71.22 |
|
0.25 |
79.08 |
||
|
2 |
U2 |
0.25 |
81.16 |
|
0.1 |
88.89 |
||
|
3 |
U3 |
0.1 |
91.88 |
|
0.25 |
94.23 |
||
|
4 |
U4 |
0.1 |
95.93 |
|
0.25 |
97.57 |
||
|
5 |
Surf excel |
0.1 |
76.49 |
|
0.25 |
80.26 |
Table 9 Study of Percent Detergency at Different Concentration on Coffee Stained Cotton Cloth
Ro=Reflectance Measured On Clean Cotton Cloth=80.1
Rs=Reflectance Measured On Coffee Cotton Cloth=29
Rw=Reflectance Measured On Washed Cotton
|
SR. NO. |
SAMPLE |
CONCENTRATION |
% DETERGENCY |
|
1 |
U1 |
01 |
74.35 |
|
0.25 |
80.84 |
||
|
2 |
U2 |
0.1 |
83.63 |
|
0.25 |
89.44 |
||
|
3 |
U3 |
0.1 |
93.36 |
|
0.25 |
94.94 |
||
|
4 |
U4 |
0.1 |
97.46 |
|
0.25 |
98.26 |
||
|
7 |
Surf excel |
0.1 |
76.49 |
|
0.25 |
80.26 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS:
As evident from table 1, An Ecofriendly carbohydrate, mixed glycols and maleic anhydride polymer was synthesized using starch 30.76 %, Sorbitol 26.92%, Glycerol 26.92%, Maleic anhydride 15.38 %, Which has ecofriendly range of BOD to COD ratio ie 0.5976.
As evident from table 2 various green powder detergents were formulated using varying proportions of polymer, acid slurry and various components. Usually commercial samples contains high proportion of Sodium tripolyphosphate, Sodium Lauryl Sulphate, Acid slurry etc. But the formulations U1 to U4 the percentage of all these components has been kept to very lower side.
As evident from table 3 that all the samples from U1 to U4 have shown pH range to the alkaline side which promotes cleaning action. The moisture level of all the samples found to be lower side.
As evident from table 4 that all the samples shows excellent performance in terms of surface tension reduction of water used for cleaning cloth. The sample U4 found to reduce surface tension of water by 57.71 % at 0.1% concentration of detergent. Likewise the samples U2, U1, U3 have shown fairly excellent performance as far as reduction in surface tension of water is concerned.
Table 5 and 6 depicts the foam volume of performance of green powder detergents i.e. U1 to U4 and commercial sample surf excel. It is seen that all those samples shows excellent foam volume even at lowest concentration of detergents. The sample U4 shows highest foam volume in the series.
The foam volume and foam forming tendency of detergents has positive effect on cleaning tendency of detergents of detergents and contributes to cosmetic importance of detergents to a large extent.
Table 7 indicates that the most important study of detergent i.e. percent detergency. The percent detergency on soil stained cotton cloth was determined using known method discussed earlier 4.
The sample U 4 found to be excellent formulation with highest cleaning percentage 85.82% at 0.1% concentration of detergent and 96.83 % detergency at 0.25 % concentration of detergent.
The samples U 2, U 1, U 3 are showing excellent performance are comparable to commercial samples and sometime even better than that. The samples U1 to U4 contains equivalent proportion of polymer and acid slurry. The EDTA percentage kept to very lower side i.e. 1.785.The percentage of sodium carbonate varied from 65.71 to 38.39.
The percent detergency on tea stained cotton cloth was performed and as seen from table-8 that the sample U4 has shown excellent percent detergency i.e.95.93 % on tea stained cotton cloth at 0.1% concentration of detergent followed by U3, U2, U1, 93.36%, 83.63%, 74.35% respectively at same concentration of detergents. These values are highest in the series in terms of percent detergency study conducted on Soil stained, Tea stained, Coffee stained cotton cloths.
CONCLUSION:
The green powder detergents U1 to U4 formulated using least percentage of Conventional pollution causing chemicals such as STTP,SLS,SLES and Acid Slurry are showing remarkably extraordinary performance as far as reduction in surface tension of water, Foam volume and percent detergency is concerned.
REFERENCES:
1. J.R. Dontulwar, D.K. Borikar, Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry, 2011, 4(7), 1084-1087.
2. J.R. Dontulwar, D.K. Borikar, Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry, 2012, 3(2), 197-1990
3. J.R. Dontulwar, Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry, 2013, 6(7), 690-693.
4. J.R. Dontulwar, Der Pharma Chemica, 2013, 5(3), 179-184.
5. J.R. Dontulwar, D.K. Borikar, Carbohydrate Polymer, 2006, 63,375-378.
6. J.R. Dontulwar, D.K. Borikar, Carbohydrate Polymer, 2006, 65,207-210.
Received on 10.03.2014 Modified on 30.03.2014
Accepted on 02.04.2014 © AJRC All right reserved
Asian J. Research Chem. 7(5): May 2014; Page 527-529