Physicochemical Assessment of Ground Water Qualities of some areas of Imphal East District of Manipur during Post-Monsoon-5th Phase
Nandababu Singh Laishram
Post-Graduate Department of Chemistry, D.M. College of Science, Imphal – 795001, Manipur, India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: l.nandababu@yahoo.com.
ABSTRACT:
Fifteen ground water samples (S-1 to S-15) were collected from fifteen different hand pumps of Imphal East district during post-monsoon period (November) of 2016. They were analyzed for physico-chemical parameters such as temperature, pH, TDS (total dissolved solids), electrical conductivity (EC), total alkalinity (TA) (and hence CO32- and HCO3-), total hardness (TH), Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+ and Cl-. Ground water (S-3) of Khanarok Awang Leikai (near foothill) was found to be fit for drinking purpose as the values of above mentioned physicochemical parameters for S-3, were below or within the acceptable limits of BIS standard for drinking water as well as that of WHO. But some suitable treatments are necessary in order to keep the values of pH (for S-13), TDS (for S-1), total alkalinity (for S-1, S-2 and S-4 to S-15), total hardness (for S-2 and S-9), Mg2+ (for S-2 and S-9) and Na+ (for S-1 and S-13) within or below the acceptable limits of BIS standard for drinking water as well as that of WHO. However ground waters represented by S-1 to S-2, S-4 to S-12 and S-14 to S-15 may also be used for drinking purpose in absence of alternate sources as their above mentioned physicochemical parameter values are below the corresponding permissible limits of BIS standard for drinking water. All the fifteen ground waters may be used for other domestic purposes. However, except S-13 other remaining fourteen ground waters are suitable and well fit for irrigation purpose.
Na+ shows strong positive correlations with HCO3-(r=0.860) and with TA (r=0.856) showing main attribution of NaHCO3 towards total alkalinity for different ground waters. EC shows strong positive correlations with TDS (r=0.916). Again TDS shows strong positive correlations with Na+, K+, HCO3- and Cl- (r=0.917, 0.605, 0.754 and 0.857 respectively). This, further, indicates that the high values of TDS for different ground waters are due to the presence of high concentrations of NaHCO3, NaCl and KCl mainly. Above all, TH also shows strong positive correlations with Ca2+ and Mg2+.
KEYWORDS: Physicochemical parameters, drinking, irrigation, post-monsoon, BIS, WHO and correlation co-efficient.
INTRODUCTION:
Nowadays rate of urbanization as well as expansion of urban areas increase due to increasing population growth all over the world day by day. This leads to loss of many surface water bodies for making sites of construction of houses, buildings, commercial areas, many institutions, offices etc.
As a result of it, there is great demand for ground water for human consumption in daily life, irrigation and other industrial purposes mainly in addition to use of surface water.
Ground water is about 0.6% out of the total global water resources and only 0.3% is extractable economically1. But it should not be taken for granted that such ground waters are always safe for drinking, other domestic, irrigation and industrial purposes.
So, it is necessary to examine such ground waters not only the surface waters from time to time so as to ascertain whether they are fit for human consumption (drinking), other domestic, irrigation purposes etc. With a view to this objective many researchers in different countries of the world, had carried out extensive researches on qualities of ground waters as well as surface water for drinking, irrigation and other purposes2-7.
Similarly, many researchers in different states of India also had carried out extensive investigations on qualities of ground waters and surface waters for human consumption, irrigation and other purposes.8-13
The present aim of this research work is to carry out physicochemical assessment of ground water qualities of some areas of Imphal East district of Manipur during post-monsoon period (November) of 2016. This is in continuation of my former research work on ground water qualities of some areas of Imphal East and Senapati districts of Manipur 14.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
All the chemicals were of AR grade and were used as received. Fifteen ground water samples (S-1 to S-15) were collected in well sterilized polythene bottles of 1 litre capacity each. For sampling and preservation, guidelines of APHA were strictly followed15.
The fifteen ground water samples were collected during post-monsoon period (November), 2016. All the ground water sampling sites along with geographical positions (measured with a GPS instrument) are shown in the following table:-1;
Table 1: Sampling sites (with geographical positions) of ground water samples
|
Sample code no. (with source) |
Sampling sites (Locations) |
Longitude |
Latitude |
|
S-1 (Hand pump) |
Langdum Makha Leikai (1) (Near foothill) |
93059/6//E |
24043/35//N |
|
S-2 (Hand pump) |
Langdum Makha Leikai (2) (Near Langdum High School) |
93058/55//E |
24043/37//N |
|
S-3 (Hand pump) |
Khanarok Awang Leikai (Near foothill) |
93059/10//E |
24043/10//N |
|
S-4 (Hand pump) |
Khanarok Lai Leirak (Near Crech Centre, Khanarok) |
93059/10//E |
24043/5//N |
|
S-5 (Hand pump) |
Khanarok Mayai Leikai |
93059/8//E |
24043/0//N |
|
S-6 (Hand pump) |
Khanarok Makha Leikai (Near foothill) |
93059/21//E |
24042/58//N |
|
S-7 (Hand pump) |
Chanam Sandrok Awang Leikai (Near foothill) |
93059/28//E |
24042/35//N |
|
S-8 (Hand pump) |
Chanam Sandrok Mayai Leikai (Near Community Hall) |
93059/26//E |
24042/28//N |
|
S-9 (Hand pump) |
Waithou Chiru (1), (Near Church) |
93058/12//E |
24040/56//N |
|
S-10 (Hand pump) |
Waithou Chiru (2) (Near foothill) |
93058/19//E |
24040/54//N |
|
S-11 (Hand pump) |
Saman Tangkhul (1) (Near church) |
93058/23//E |
24040/54//N |
|
S-12 (Hand pump) |
Saman Tangkhul (2) (Near waiting set) |
93058/24//E |
24040/48//N |
|
S-13 (Hand pump) |
Thiyam Konjil Khongballou Leikai (Near Paddy field) |
93058/45//E |
24041/9//N |
|
S-14 (Hand pump) |
Thiyam Konjil Samanjing Leikai (Near Solo Club) |
93058/50//E |
24041/21//N |
|
S-15 (Hand pump) |
Thiyam Konjil Mamang Leikai (Near Pan dukan) |
93058/53//E |
24041/39//N |
The fifteen ground water samples (S-1 to S-15) were analyzed for physicochemical parameters such as temperature, pH, total dissolved solids (TDS), electrical conductivity (EC), total alkalinity (TA) (and hence CO32- and HCO3-), total hardness (TH), Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+ and Cl-.
Parameters such as temperature, pH, TDS and EC were measured at corresponding sampling sites while parameters like TA (and hence CO32- and HCO3-), TH, Ca2+, Mg2+ and Cl- were determined at departmental research laboratory using standard methods15.
Further values of Na+ and K+ were determined using Flame Photometer 128 (Systronics, India). Brief methods and instruments used for determinations and measurement of different physicochemical parameters, are shown in table – 2 below:
Table-2: Instruments and methods used for measurement/determination of physico-chemical parameters of ground water samples
|
Physicochemical parameters measured / determined |
Instruments and brief methods used |
|
Temperature |
TDS Meter (TDS-3) (TDS/Temp.) (HIMEDIA, India). |
|
pH |
pHep® Pocket-sized pH Meter (HI98107) (HANNA Instruments, Romania) |
|
TDS (Total dissolved solids) |
TDS Meter (TDS-3) (TDS/Temp.) (HIMEDIA, India) |
|
Electrical conductivity (EC) |
Conductivity Tester (Dist3: HI 98303) (HANNA Instruments, Romania) |
|
Total alkalinity (TA) |
Titrimetric method with standard HCl solution using phenolphthalein and methyl orange indicators |
|
CO32- and HCO3- |
By calculation method from total alkalinity values |
|
Total Hardness (TH) |
EDTA titrimetric method (using Eriochrome Black T indicator) |
|
Calcium (Ca2+) |
EDTA titrimetric method (using Murexide indicator) |
|
Magnesium (Mg2+) |
By calculation method |
|
Sodium (Na+) and Potassium (K+) |
Flame Photometer 128 (Systronics, India) |
|
Chloride (Cl-) |
Argentometric titrimetric method (Using K2CrO4 indicator solution) |
The values of parameters such as RSC (residual sodium carbonate) and SAR (sodium adsorption ratio) for different ground waters, were calculated using the following relationships16-17.
RSC = (CO32- + CHO3-) – (Ca2++Mg2+), and
, where all ionic concentrations were expressed in
milli-equivalents/litre(meq/L).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
All the fifteen ground waters (S-1 to S-15) were found to be colorless and odourless. The experimental values of different physicochemical parameters for the fifteen ground waters, are detailed in table – 3 given below:
Table -3: Values of physicochemical parameters of ground water samples from different sampling sites.
|
Sample code no. |
Temp (ᵒC) |
pH |
TDS (mg/L) |
Electrical conductivity (EC) (µS/cm) |
Total alkalinity (as CaCO3) (mg/L) |
CO32- (mg/L) |
|
S-1 |
22.8 |
7.6 |
589 |
1224 |
372.2 |
0 |
|
S-2 |
22.4 |
7.6 |
249 |
546 |
286.3 |
0 |
|
S-3 |
23.2 |
7.4 |
182 |
378 |
192.2 |
0 |
|
S-4 |
21.5 |
7.2 |
212 |
451 |
241.3 |
0 |
|
S-5 |
21.2 |
7.6 |
255 |
540 |
302.7 |
0 |
|
S-6 |
21.8 |
7.6 |
223 |
485 |
278.1 |
0 |
|
S-7 |
22.3 |
7.7 |
386 |
783 |
317 |
0 |
|
S-8 |
21.5 |
7.5 |
195 |
401 |
220.9 |
0 |
|
S-9 |
23.1 |
7.7 |
258 |
512 |
306.6 |
0 |
|
S-10 |
23.2 |
7.8 |
217 |
478 |
243.4 |
0 |
|
S-11 |
23.4 |
7.4 |
234 |
516 |
276.1 |
0 |
|
S-12 |
23.4 |
7.7 |
270 |
589 |
300.6 |
0 |
|
S-13 |
23.2 |
8.8 |
422 |
897 |
513.3 |
22.1 |
|
S-14 |
22.8 |
7.5 |
254 |
566 |
314.9 |
0 |
|
S-15 |
22.6 |
7.6 |
286 |
622 |
339.5 |
0 |
Table -3 Continue.............
|
Sample code no. |
HCO3-(mg/L) |
Total hardness(as CaCO3)(mg/L) |
Ca2+ (mg/L) |
Mg2+ (mg/L) |
Na+ (mg/L) |
K+ (mg/L) |
Cl- (mg/L) |
|
S-1 |
454.1 |
144 |
23.2 |
23.3 |
216.4 |
1.5 |
214.1 |
|
S-2 |
349.3 |
230 |
37.7 |
33 |
35.3 |
0.7 |
2.8 |
|
S-3 |
234.5 |
114 |
20 |
15.6 |
36.2 |
0.9 |
5.7 |
|
S-4 |
294.4 |
148 |
27.3 |
19.4 |
42.8 |
0.9 |
4.3 |
|
S-5 |
369.3 |
138 |
21.6 |
20.4 |
83.4 |
1.1 |
14.2 |
|
S-6 |
339.3 |
192 |
39.3 |
22.8 |
39.5 |
0.9 |
7.1 |
|
S-7 |
386.7 |
138 |
25.7 |
18 |
115.7 |
1 |
95 |
|
S-8 |
269.5 |
148 |
21.6 |
22.8 |
36.8 |
0.8 |
7.1 |
|
S-9 |
374.1 |
228 |
39.3 |
31.6 |
39.8 |
1.1 |
4.3 |
|
S-10 |
296.9 |
166 |
27.3 |
23.8 |
43 |
1.0 |
4.3 |
|
S-11 |
336.8 |
178 |
32.1 |
23.8 |
52.8 |
0.8 |
4.3 |
|
S-12 |
366.7 |
190 |
33.7 |
25.8 |
59.2 |
1.2 |
8.5 |
|
S-13 |
581.3 |
26 |
4 |
3.9 |
218.1 |
0.8 |
4.3 |
|
S-14 |
384.2 |
100 |
20 |
12.2 |
94.8 |
0.9 |
8.5 |
|
S-15 |
414.2 |
142 |
30.5 |
16 |
92 |
0.9 |
12.8 |
Based on the table -3, the following discussion has been made:
Temperature:
The temperatures of the fifteen ground waters (S-1 to S-15) are in the range 21.2-23.40C (table -3). Ground water represented by S-5 has the lowest temperature (21.20C) while each of S-11 and S-12 has highest temperature (23.40C).
pH:
The pH values of all the fifteen ground waters (S-1 to S-15) ranges from 7.2. to 8.8 (table – 3). S-4 has the lowest pH values (7.2) while that of S-13 is highest (8.8). Except S-13, all other remaining ground waters (S-1 to S-12 and S-14 to S-15) have their pH values within the acceptable limit (6.5 to 8.5) for drinking water of BIS (Bureau of Indian standards) as well as that of WHO (World Health Organization)18-19.
TDS (Total dissolved solids):
The values of total dissolved solids (TDS) for all the fifteen ground waters ( S-1 to S-15) ranges from 182 mg/L to 589 mg/L ( table-3). S-3 has the lowest value of TDS (182mg/L) while that of S-1 is highest (589 mg/L).Except S-I, other remaining fourteen ground waters (S-2 to S-15) have their TDS values within acceptable limit of BIS standard for drinking water ( 500 mg / L)18.However, in case of S-1, the TDS value is below the permissible limit ( 1000 mg /L). All the ground waters (S-1 to S-15) may be used for other domestic purposes also as their TDS values are less than 1000 mg/L20.
Electrical Conductivity (EC):
The electrical conductivity values for all the fifteen ground waters (S-1 to S-15) are in the range 378-1224mS/cm(table-3). S-3 has the lowest value of EC (378mS/cm) while that of S-1 is the highest( 1224mS/cm).
Total alkalinity (TA):
The total alkalinity values for all the ground waters ( S-1to S-15) range from 192.2 mg/L to 513.3 mg/L (table-3). S-3 has the lowest value of it (192.2 mg/L) while that of S-13 is the highest (513.3 mg/L). Only S-3 has value of total alkalinity below the acceptable limit (200 mg/L) of BIS standard for drinking water while those of remaining fourteen ground waters ( S-1 to S-2 and S-4 to S-15) are above the acceptable limit but below the permissible limit (600 mg/L) of BIS standard for drinking water18.
CO32- and HCO3- :
The concentrations of CO32- for fourteen ground waters (S-1 to S-12 and S-14 to S-15) are found to be zero but in case of S-13, its value is found to be 22.1 mg/L (table-3). However, the concentrations of HCO3- for all the fifteen ground waters (S-1 to S-15) are in the range 234.5 – 581.3 mg/L (table -3). S-3 has lowest concentration of HCO3- (234.5 mg/L) while that of S-13 is highest (581.3 mg/L). For S-1 to S-12 and S-14 to S-15, the alkalinity is due to the presence of bicarbonate salts while that of S-13 is due to carbonate and bicarbonate salts.
Total hardness (TH) :
The total hardness values for all the fifteen ground waters (S-1 to S-15) ranges from 26 mg/L to 230 mg/L (table-3). Except S-2 and S-9, other remaining thirteen ground waters (S-1, S-3 to S-8 and S-10 to S-15) have their total hardness values below the acceptable limit (200 mg/L) of BIS standard for drinking water18. But the values of total hardness for S-2 and S-9 are also below the permissible limit (600 mg/L) of BIS standard for drinking water18. From tables-3 it is clearly seen that only S-13 belongs to soft water category (0-75mg/L); S-1, S-3toS-5, S-7, S-8, S-14 and S-15 belong to moderately hard water category ( 75-150 mg/L) while S-2, S-6 and S-9 to S-12 belong to hard water category ( 150-300 mg/L )20.
Calcium (Ca2+):
The fifteen ground waters ( S-1 to S-15) have their concentrations of Ca2+ ranging from 4 mg/L to 39.3 mg/L(table-3). So all these values ( concentrations) of Ca2+ for all the fifteen ground waters are below the acceptable limit (75 mg/L) of BIS standard for drinking water18. S-13 has lowest concentration of Ca2+ (4 mg/L) while that of S-6 and S-9 are highest ( 39.3 mg/L each ).
Magnesium (Mg2+) :
The fifteen ground waters (S-1 to S-15) have their concentration sof Mg2+ ranging from 3.9 mg/L to 33 mg/L (table -3). S-13 has lowest concentration of Mg2+(3.9 mg/L) while that of S-2 is highest (33 mg/L). S-1, S-3 to S-8 and S-10 to S-15 have their corresponding concentrations of Mg2+ below the acceptable limit (30 mg/L) but S-2 and S-9 have their concentrations of Mg2+ above the acceptable limit but below the permissible limit (100 mg/L) of BIS standard for drinking water18.
Sodium (Na+) :
Regarding Sodium (Na+) contents in these different ground waters ( S-1 to S-15), their concentration values are in the range 35.3 – 218.1 mg/L ( table-3).S-2 to S-12, S-14 and S-15 have their concentrations of sodium (Na+) below the threshold limit(200 mg/L) of WHO while those of S-1 and S-13 are above this threshold limit.19
Potassium (K+):
All the fifteen ground waters (S-1 to S-15) have low concentrations of K+ ranging from 0.7 mg/L to 1.5 mg/L (table – 3). S-2 has lowest concentration of K+ (0.7mg/L) while that of S-1 is highest (1.5 mg/L).
Chloride (Cl-):
All the fifteen ground waters (S-1 to S-15) have their concentration of Cl- ranging from 2.8 mg/L to 214 mg/L(table-3). All the concentration values of Cl- for the different ground waters, are below the acceptable limit (250 mg/L) of BIS standard for drinking water18. S-2 has lowest concentration of Cl- (2.8 mg/L) while that of S-1 is highest (214.1 mg/L).
Ground water quality for irrigation:
The values of RSC (residual sodium carbonate) and SAR (sodium adsorption ratio) for the fifteen ground waters (S-1 to S-15) are given below:
Table-4: Values of RSC and SAR for different ground water samples
|
Sample code no. |
S-1 |
S-2 |
S-3 |
S-4 |
S-5 |
S-6 |
S-7 |
S-8 |
|
RSC (Residual sodium carbonate) (meq/L) |
4.37 |
1.13 |
1.56 |
1.87 |
3.30 |
1.73 |
3.58 |
1.96 |
|
SAR (sodium adsorption ratio) |
7.6 |
1.0 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
3.0 |
1.2 |
4.3 |
1.3 |
Table-4 Cont............
|
Sample code no. |
S-9 |
S-10 |
S-11 |
S-12 |
S-13 |
S-14 |
S-15 |
|
RSC (Residual sodium carbonate) (meq/L) |
1.57 |
1.55 |
1.96 |
2.21 |
9.74 |
4.30 |
3.95 |
|
SAR (sodium adsorption ratio) |
1.1 |
1.5 |
1.7 |
1.9 |
18.6 |
4.1 |
3.4 |
From the above table-4, it is clearly seen that the values of RSC for all the fifteen ground waters, ranges from 1.13 meq/L to 9.74 meq/L. S-2 has least value (1.13 meq/L) of RSC while that of S-13 is highest (9.74 meq/L). On the basis of RSC values only S-2 belongs to excellent category of water (RSC value<1.25 meq/L) while that of S-3, S-4, S-6 and S-8 to S-12 are within the good quality category of water (RSC value in the range 1.25 – 2.5 meq/L) for irrigation1,16.
However, on the basis of SAR values shown in table –4 above, the ground waters represented by S-1 to S-12 and S-14 to S-15 belong the excellent category of water for irrigation purpose (SAR value upto 10)1,17. Therefore, it is inferred that ground waters represented by S-1 to S-12 and S-14 to S-15 are suitable and fit for irrigation purpose.
Statistical analysis based on correlation co-efficient (r) values:
The calculated correlation co-efficient (r) values of different variable pairs of physicochemical parameters for the fifteen ground waters (S-1 to S-15), are detailed in table –5 given below:
Table – 5: Correlation co-efficient (r) values between different variable pairs of physicochemical parameters of ground water samples
|
|
Temp. |
pH |
TDS |
EC |
TA |
CO32- |
HCO3- |
TH |
Ca2+ |
Mg2+ |
Na+ |
K+ |
Cl- |
|
Temp. |
|||||||||||||
|
pH |
0.331 |
1 |
|||||||||||
|
TDS |
0.191 |
0.437 |
1 |
||||||||||
|
EC |
0.211 |
0.448 |
0.996 |
1 |
|||||||||
|
TA |
0.248 |
0.820 |
0.727 |
0.746 |
1 |
||||||||
|
CO32- |
0.237 |
0.906 |
0.361 |
0.376 |
0.786 |
1 |
|||||||
|
HCO3- |
0.241 |
0.780 |
0.754 |
0.773 |
0.996 |
0.730 |
1 |
||||||
|
TH |
-0.052 |
-0.513 |
-0.323 |
-0.336 |
-0.506 |
-0.684 |
-0.464 |
1 |
|||||
|
Ca2+ |
-0.030 |
-0.529 |
-0.341 |
-0.346 |
-0.462 |
-0.683 |
-0.415 |
0.951 |
1 |
||||
|
Mg2+ |
-0.055 |
-0.466 |
-0.219 |
-0.237 |
-0.482 |
-0.643 |
-0.443 |
0.963 |
0.838 |
1 |
|||
|
Na+ |
0.189 |
0.622 |
0.917 |
0.926 |
0.856 |
0.623 |
0.860 |
-0.645 |
-0.637 |
-0.553 |
1 |
||
|
K+ |
0.125 |
-0.058 |
0.605 |
0.586 |
0.157 |
-0.232 |
0.206 |
0.096 |
0.051 |
0.189 |
0.411 |
1 |
|
|
Cl- |
0.024 |
-0.025 |
0.857 |
0.838 |
0.279 |
-0.108 |
0.324 |
-0.083 |
-0.123 |
0.032 |
0.651 |
0.735 |
1 |
From the table –5, it is clearly seen that Na+ has strong positive correlations with HCO3- (r=0.951) and with TA (total alkalinity) (r=0.856) showing that alkalinity of ground waters (S-1 to S-15), is mainly due to the presence of NaHCO3.TH has strong positive correlations with Ca2+(r=0.951) and with Mg2+(r=0.963), which shows that hardness of such ground waters is due to the presence of calcium and magnesium salts.EC shows strong positive correlation with TDS (r=0.996) showing that EC values of different ground waters (S-1 to S-15), are directly proportional to corresponding values of TDS. Again TDS shows strong positive correlation with TA (r=0.727). Further TDS also shows strong positive correlations with Na+, K+, HCO3-and Cl-(r=0.917, 0.605, 0.754 and 0.857 respectively). Na+ shows strong positive correlations with HCO3- and Cl- (r=0.860 and 0.651 respectively) but K+ shows strong positive correlation with Cl-(r=0.735). This shows that high values of TDS for various ground waters are mainly due to the presence of high concentrations of NaHCO3, NaCl and KCl.
CONCLUSIONS:
From the above discussion based on various experimental results for the fifteen ground waters, the following conclusions are drawn:
i. Ground water (S-3) of Khanarok Awang Leikai (Near foothill) is fit for drinking purpose from physicochemical analyses point of view.
ii. Some suitable treatments are necessary so as to keep the values of pH (for S-13), TDS (for S-1), total alkalinity (for S-1, S-2 and S-4 to S-15), total hardness (for S-2 and S-9), Mg2+ (for S-2 and S-9) and Na+ (for S-1 and S-13) within their corresponding acceptable limit of BIS standard for drinking water. However, ground waters represented by S-1, S-2, S-4 to S-12 and S-14 to S-15 may also be used for drinking purpose in absence of alternate sources.
iii. All the fifteen ground waters (S-1 to S-15) may be used for other domestic purposes.
iv. Ground waters represented by S-1 to S-12 and S-14 to S-15, are fit for irrigation purpose.
v. Strong positive correlations of TA with Na+ and HCO3-show that alkalinity of different ground waters, is mainly due the presence of NaHCO3. High values of TDS for different ground waters (S-1 to S-15) are attributed to the presence of mainly NaHCO3, NaCl and KCl as TDS shows strong positive correlations with Na+, K+, HCO3- and Cl-. Lastly, strong positive correlations of total hardness with Ca2+ and Mg2+ indicates that total hardness for different ground waters (S-1 to S-15), is due to the presence of calcium and magnesium salts.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
The author is thankful to the principal, D.M. College of Science, Imphal for some of the laboratory facilities provided for the research work. Further, the author is also thankful to those local people of different sampling sites for their cooperation.
REFERENCES:
1. Raghunath H.M. Ground Water, 3rd Edition, New age International (P) Limited, Publishers, New Delhi, 2007, 1-308.
2. Oiste A.M. Ground water quality assessment in urban environment. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 1; 2014: 2095-2102.
3. Tindall J. A. and Chen A. Variables that affect agricultural chemicals in ground water in Nebraska. Water Air Soil Pollut., 225; 2014; 1862.
4. Adebo B.A. and Adetoyinbo A.A. Assessment of groundwater quality in unconsolidated sedimentary coastal aquifer in Lagos, Nigeria. Scientific Research and Essay, 4(4); 2009:314-319.
5. Ramirez E. etal. Microbiological and physicochemical quality of well water used as a source of public supply. Air, Soil and Water Research, 3; 2010:105-112.
6. Chudaeva V.A. etal. The composition of ground waters of Muraviov-Amursky peninsula, primorye, Russia. Indian J. Mar. Sci., 37 (2); 2008: 193-199.
7. Ali M.S. etal. Irrigation quality of ground water of twenty villages in Lahore district. Soil and Environ., 28(1); 2009:1723.
8. Anusathya M.K. and Illavarasan N. Urbanization impact on ground water quality at Coimbatore city. Indian J. Environ. Prot., 36(3); 2016: 242-247.
9. Vyas P.B. Assessment of drinking water Gandhinagar town, Gujarat, India. Poll Res., 30(2); 2011:161-163.
10. Hazarika S. and Bhuyan B. Fluoride, arsenic and iron content of ground water around six selected tea gardens of Lakhimpur district, Assam, India. Arch. Appl. Sci. Res., 5(1); 2013:57-61.
11. Vinodkumar T.etal. Assessment of physico-chemical parameters of Priyadarshini Jurula project waters in Mahabubnagar district, Telangana state, India. Asian J. Research Chem., 8(8); 2015: 521-524.
12. Raju G.S. Evaluation of chemical quality of ground water in Galiveedu Mandal of Kadapa district. Indian J. Environ. Prot., 36(3): 2016:234-241.
13. Subramani T. etal. Ground water quality and its suitability for drinking and agriculture use in Chithar river basin, Tamil Nadu, India. Environ.Geol.,47;2005:1099-1110.
14. Laishram N.S. Physicochemical analysis of ground water qualities of some areas of Imphal East and Senapati districts of Manipur during pre-monsoon. Asian J. Research Chem., 9(12): 2016: 683-688.
15. Greenberg AE etal.(eds.). Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Waste water. APHA, AWWA and WEF, Washington, DC 200005; 18thed: 1992.
16. Wilcox L.V. Classification and uses of Irrigation waters.USDA, Washington, DC; 1955.
17. Todd D.K. Ground Water Hydrology, John Wiley and Sons (Asia)Pvt. Ltd., Singapore, 2004; 2nd ed: pp. 300-302.
18. BIS IS 10500:2012 Indian Standard Drinking Water-Specification (Second revision). Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi, 2012.
19. WHO Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality. World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland, 2011; 4th ed: pp. 226-227.
20. Manivasakam N. Physicochemical Examination of Water and Industrial Effluents. Pragati Prakashan, Meerut, India, 2008;pp.35-66.
Received on 25.11.2017 Modified on 12.12.2017
Accepted on 22.12.2017 © AJRC All right reserved
Asian J. Research Chem. 2017; 10(6):839-844.
DOI: 10.5958/0974-4150.2017.00140.7