Standardization and HPTLC Fingerprinting of Unani compound formulation Habb-e-Muqil Jadeed

 

Negi R. K.1*, Rasheed Naikodi M. A.2, Sajwan S.1, Asim Ali Khan3, Khan A. S.1, Meena R. P.3

1Drug Standardization Research Institute, CCRUM, Ministry of AYUSH., Govt. of India, PLIM Campus,

Kamla Nehru Nagar, Ghaziabad, U.P., India.

2National Research Institute of Unani Medicine for Skin Disorders, A.G. Colony Road, Hyderabad,

Under CCRUM, Ministry of AYUSH., Govt. of India.

3Central Council for Research in Unani Medicine, 61-65, Institutional Area, Opp: D Block Janakpuri,

New Delhi, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: ashraydsri@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

Standardization and evaluation of Unani formulations is very much essential to ascertain the quality of medicine. Unani medicines have played a significant role in maintaining the good health among the masses around the globe. Unani medicines are accepted as important therapeutic agents for treatment of various kinds of diseases, because of its harmonious nature with the human body. Habb-e-Muqil Jadeed an Unani Compound formulation is frequently prescribed for the treatment of Kabz (Constipation) in Unani system of medicine. In many instances, it has been noticed that due to adulterated raw herbs it is very difficult to find the genuine product in market place. The present communication deals with the proper authentification, identification, determination of physico-chemical constants, chromatographic profile, aflatoxin contamination, pesticide residue and heavy metal analysis of the formulation. The present standardization and HPTLC fingerprinting developing sets the standard for quality assurance of the formulation in the global marketing.

 

KEYWORDS: Kabz (Constipation), Aflatoxin contamination, pesticide residue, chromatographic profile.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Habb are small, rounded and uniformly shaped medicinal preparations used in Unani System of Medicine1. Habb-e-Muqil Jadeed was frequently prescribed by unani physician in the treatment of Kabz (Constipation)2. The composition of Habb-e-Muqil Jadeed was mentioned in NFUM consisting of ingredients as given in Table 1.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

The raw drug ingredients of the Habb-e-Muqil Jadeed (figure 1) were procured form the Pharmacy of NRIUMSD, Hyderabad. All the ingredients (figure 2) are identified by expert Botanist using pharmacopoeial standards3.

 

The physico-chemical studies of the Habb-e-Muqil Jadeed were carried out according to UPI, for HPTLC Profile “Desaga sarstedt Gruppe” system with automatic sample applicator was used and photographs were taken with the help of Desaga photo-documentation system4,5.

 

Microbial contamination, aflatoxin contamination, Heavy metal estimation, pesticide residue were studied as per UPI.

 

Fig. 1. Habb-e-Muqil Jadeed


Table 1. Formulation composition 2,6,7,8

S. No

Name

Botanical/sci. Name

Part used

Qty.

1

Muqil Azraq UPI-I6

Commiphora mukul (Hook ex Stocks) Engl.

Oleo-gum resin

250gm

2

Rasuat Zard UPI11

Berberis aristata Dc.

Extract

280gm

3

Satt-e-Podina API-VI7

Mentha arvensis Linn.

Purified extract

5gm

4

Ararot8,9

Maranta arundinaceae Linn.

Starch

Q.S.

5

Roughan-e-Kunjad UPI-II11

Oil of Sesamum indicum Linn.

Oil

Q.S.

6

Aab-e-Adrak UPI-I(iv),10

Zingiber officinale Rosc.

water

Q.S.

UPI= The Unani Pharmacopoeia of India

API= The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India

 


Rasaut

Ararot

Muqil Ajraq

 

Sat Pudina

Fig.2: Photographs of Ingredients of Habb-e-Muqil

 

Method of preparation:

It is prepared according to the composition of the formulation composition given above is as follows.

All the ingredients were taken of pharmacopoeial quality and cleaned by removing the foreign materials. Muqil Azraq and Rasuat Zard are purified and powdered. Satt-e-Podina was added to the powered mixture. The mixture so obtained was rubbed (charb) in Raughan-e-Kunjad. Ararot Paste was made using Aab-e-Adrak. All ingredients were mixed and passed through mesh no. 40 to make the granules. Granules are subjected to make the Habb (Tablets).

 

Thin layer chromatography and HPTLC:

Two gram of drug sample was extracted with 20ml of Petroleum ether (40-60°C) by refluxing on a water bath for 30 min. The extract so obtained was filtered and concentrated up to 5ml to carry out the thin layer chromatography. Concentrated Petroleum ether extract was applied on TLC plate.

 

RESULT AND DISCUSSION:

Analytical Profile:

Organoleptic characters:

Habb-e-Muqil Jadeed is dark brown in colour, solid, mint like odour and slightly bitter in taste. The surface of the tablet is smooth as shown in the figure1. Organoleptic evaluations are carried out based on the method described by Siddique et al12.

 

Physico-chemical analysis:

The Physico-chemical parameters of the formulations Habb-e-Muqil Jadeed were studied such as total ash, acid insoluble ash, solubility in water and alcohol, loss in weight on drying at 105°C, and the results are tabulated in table 2. Safety evaluation parameters such as microbial load, aflatoxins, heavy metals and pesticide residues were studied as per method described in WHO guidelines13.

 

Safety evaluation:

Safety evaluation such as heavy metal analysis, microbial load estimation, aflatoxin contamination, and pesticide residue analysis were analyzed and the results are tabulated in the tables 3-6.


Table 2. Physico chemical parameters of Unani Compound formulation Habb-e-Muqil Jadeed          

S. No

Parameter

Sample-I

Sample-II

Sample-III

1.       

Colour

Dark Brown

Dark Brown

Dark Brown

2.       

Odour

mint like

mint like

mint like

3.       

Taste

slightly bitter

slightly bitter

slightly bitter

4.       

Total ash (%w/w)

25.6728

26.1026

26.3256

5.       

Acid insoluble ash (%w/w)

22.4625

22.3562

22.4126

6.       

Alcohol soluble matter (%w/w)

17.2632

17.1706

17.4281

7.       

Water soluble matter (%w/w)

34.2736

34.3688

34.2876

8.       

Loss in wt. on drying at 105 0C (%w/w)

5.0016

5.0156

5.0562

9.       

pH of 1% aqueous solution

5.70

5.74

5.72

10.    

pH of 10% aqueous solution

5.65

5.69

5.67

 


Table-3. Heavy metal analysis (Method of testing as per WHO13 and AOAC14)

S.No.

Parameter analyzed

Results

WHO  permissible limit

Batch 1

Batch 2

Batch 3

1

Lead (Pb)

ND

ND

ND

10 ppm

2

Cadmium (Cd)

ND

ND

ND

0.3 ppm

3

Arsenic (As)

ND

ND

ND

3.0 ppm

4

Mercury (Hg)

ND

ND

ND

1.0 ppm

 

Table-4. Microbial contamination

S.No.

Parameter analyzed

Results

WHO permissible limit

1

Total Bacterial load

25x102

not more than 105/g

2

Salmonella spp.

Nil

Nil

3

Escherichia coli

Nil

Nil

4

Total Fungal count

10x10

not more than 103/g

 

Table-5. Aflatoxin contamination

S.No.

Parameter analyzed

Results

WHO permissible limit

1

B1

Nil

not more than 0.50 ppm

2

B2

Nil

not more than 0.10 ppm

3

G1

Nil

not more than 0.50 ppm

4

G2

Nil

not more than 0.10 ppm

 

Table-6. Pesticide residue: (Method of Testing AOAC 2007.01 by GC MSMS / LC MSMS)

S. No

Test parameters

Results (mg/kg)

1

Aldrin

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

2

Chlordane (cis & trans)

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

3

Alachlor

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

4

Azinphos-methyl

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

5

Chlorfenviniphos

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

6

Endosulphan (all isomers)

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

7

Endrin

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

8

Chlorpyrifos

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

9

Chlorpyrifos-methyl

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

10

Cypermethrin

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

11

DDT

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

12

Deltamethrin

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

13

Diazinon

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

14

Dichlorvos

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

15

Ethion

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

16

Fenitrothion

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

17

Fenvalerate

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

18

Heptachlor

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

19

Hexachlorobenzene

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

20

Lindane(gamma-HCH)

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

21

Malathion

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

22

Parathion

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

23

Parathion methyl

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

24

Permethrin

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

25

Phosalone

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

26

Pirimiphos methyl

BLQ (LOQ-0.01)

*BLQ- Below limit of Quantification / LOQ-limit of quantification

 

 

At UV 366nm

At UV 254nm

 

 

 

 

Expose to Iodine vapours

After derivatization with anisaldehyde sulphuric acid

Fig-3: HPTLC of Petroleum ether extract of Habb-e-Muqil Jadeed

 

Thin layer chromatography:

The TLC studies of Petroleum ether extract are tabulated in table 7. Petroleum ether (40-60°C) extract was spotted on silica gel “G” plate and developed with Toluene: Ethyl acetate (9:1) as mobile phase shows eight spots under UV 366nm at Rf values 0.03 (Fluorescent Blue), 0.06 (Fluorescent Blue), 0.31 (Fluorescent Blue), 0.39 (Fluorescent Blue), 0.49 (Fluorescent Blue), 0.60 (Fluorescent Blue), 0.69 (Blue), and 0.82  (blue); and under UV 254nm shows seven spots at Rf values 0.11, 0.17, 0.21, 0.29, 0.46, 0.60, 0.90 (All black); and under Iodine vapours shows seven spots at Rf values 0.11, 0.29, 0.33, 0.49, 0.60, 0.64, 0.90 (All brown); and under visible region after derivatizing with anisaldehyde sulphuric acid shows ten spots at Rf values 0.06 (Grey), 0.11 (brown), 0.29 (reddish pink), 0.33 (Grey), 0.49 (blue), 0.60 (Purple), 0.63 (Purple), 0.67 (Dark Purple), 0.90 (Brown) and 0.99 (Purple) as shown in the figure 3.


 

Table-7.  Rf Values of petroleum ether (40-60°C) extract.

Solvent System

Rf Values

Uv-366 nm

8 Spots

UV-254 nm

7 Spots

Under Iodine Vapour

7 Spots

under visible region after derivatizing with anisaldehyde sulphuric acid 10 Spots

 

Toluene: Ethyl acetate

(9:1)

 

 

 

0.03 (Fluorescent Blue)

0.11 (Black)

0.11 (Brown)

0.06 (Grey)

0.06 (Fluorescent Blue)

0.17 (Black)

0.29 (Brown)

0.11 (brown)

0.31 (Fluorescent Blue)

0.21 (Black)

0.33 (Brown)

0.29 (reddish pink)

0.39 (Fluorescent Blue)

0.29 (Black)

0.49 (Brown)

0.33 (Grey)

0.49 (Fluorescent Blue)

0.46 (Black)

0.60 (Brown)

0.49 (blue)

0.60 (Fluorescent Blue)

0.60 (Black)

0.64 (Brown)

0.60 (Purple)

0.69 (Blue)

0.90 (Black)

0.90 (Brown)

0.63 (Purple)

0.82 (Blue)

0.67 (Dark Purple)

0.90 (Brown)

0.99 (Purple)

 

Table-8. Peak list of Petroleum ether extract of Habb-e-Muqil Jadeed at UV 366nm (Fig-4)

Peak no

Y-Pos

Area

Area %

Height

Rf value

1

    11.3

  476.44

   16.39

  192.94

0.03

2

    15.3

  364.37

   12.54

  123.73

0.09

3

    18.5

  179.06

    6.16

   53.61

0.13

4

    23.9

  463.41

   15.94

  173.88

0.20

5

    28.1

  217.77

    7.49

   88.76

0.26

6

    36.0

    9.22

    0.32

    5.19

0.36

7

    45.0

  509.79

   17.54

  107.26

0.49

8

    52.0

  519.30

   17.87

  163.88

0.58

9

    57.8

    5.94

    0.20

    5.27

0.66

10

    60.7

   61.73

    2.12

   21.60

0.70

11

    76.1

    9.48

    0.33

    4.85

0.91

12

    79.1

   38.88

    1.34

   11.14

0.95

13

    82.4

   51.18

    1.76

   22.46

0.99

 

 

 

at UV 366nm

at UV 254nm

 

 

upon exposure to Iodine vapours at 580 nm

after derivatization with anisaldehyde sulphuric acid at 580 nm

Fig. 4. Densitogram of Petroleum ether extract of Habb-e-Muqil Jadeed

 


 

 

HPTLC analysis:

Petroleum ether (40-60°C) extract was spotted on silica gel “G” plate and developed with toluene: ethyl acetate (9: 1). The TLC plate under various detection systems such as UV 366nm, UV 254nm, upon exposure to iodine vapours and after derivatization with anisaldehyde sulphuric acid and heating at 105°C was subjected to scanning using the HPTLC densitometer. The corresponding densitograms were obtained in which peaks for the components are appeared as shown in the figure 4. The corresponding peak areas obtained in various detection systems were recorded and depicted in the tables 8-11.

 

Table-9. Peak list of Petroleum ether extract of Habb-e-Muqil Jadeed at UV 254 nm

Peak no

Y-Pos

Area

Area %

Height

Rf value

1

    11.5

 1334.12

    7.46

  432.94

0.03

2

    15.4

  923.35

    5.17

  390.65

0.09

3

    18.1

 1676.90

    9.38

  557.58

0.12

4

    21.8

 2016.44

   11.28

  706.49

0.17

5

    26.0

 3287.47

   18.39

  884.54

0.23

6

    31.5

 1423.97

    7.97

  338.97

0.30

7

    36.9

  779.78

    4.36

  134.16

0.38

8

    45.5

 1596.66

    8.93

  391.90

0.49

9

    51.6

 1520.32

    8.50

  436.35

0.58

10

    60.2

  842.18

    4.71

  129.38

0.69

11

    73.3

  872.99

    4.88

  148.06

0.87

12

    80.7

 1602.54

    8.96

  360.48

0.97

 

Table-10. Peak list of Petroleum ether extract of Habb-e-Muqil Jadeed upon exposure to Iodine vapours at 580 nm

Peak no

Y-Pos

Area

Area %

Height

Rf value

1

    11.3

  115.94

    2.85

   61.14

0.03

2

    17.0

  721.13

   17.72

  161.27

0.11

3

    22.4

   31.45

    0.77

   22.05

0.18

4

    27.3

   38.14

    0.94

   21.15

0.25

5

    31.0

  198.14

    4.87

   67.85

0.30

6

    33.7

  114.48

    2.81

   49.16

0.33

7

    44.0

  523.24

   12.86

  155.29

0.47

8

    51.7

  231.88

    5.70

   66.31

0.58

9

    56.0

  462.30

   11.36

  165.13

0.64

10

    76.3

 1128.60

   27.73

  162.80

0.91

11

    81.3

  504.28

   12.39

  146.60

0.98

 

Table-11. Peak list of Petroleum ether extract of Habb-e-Muqil Jadeed after derivatization with anisaldehyde sulphuric acid at 580nm

Peak no

Y-Pos

Area

Area %

Height

Rf value

1

    14.5

 5526.42

    7.81

 1263.67

0.07

2

    18.0

10439.06

   14.75

 1594.28

0.12

3

    29.0

 2045.95

    2.89

  698.94

0.26

4

    32.6

 4729.20

    6.68

 1155.83

0.31

5

    35.9

 3897.33

    5.51

 1005.83

0.35

6

    46.3

12738.99

   18.00

 1631.12

0.49

7

    51.7

 3050.83

    4.31

  955.49

0.56

8

    58.8

 6845.14

    9.67

 1497.83

0.66

9

    66.7

 2182.80

    3.08

  481.58

0.76

10

    78.6

12042.20

   17.02

 1261.55

0.92

11

    84.0

 7266.16

   10.27

 1464.47

0.99

 

 

 

CONCLUSION:

The present study had developed a standard of pharmacopoeial quality for the unani compound formulation Habb-e-Muqil Jadeed with respect to physico-chemical analysis, HPTLC analysis and safety evaluation such as heavy metal analysis, aflatoxin contamination, pesticide residue analysis and microbial load estimation. All the safety parameters were found within permissible limits as per WHO guidelines. Thus the present study serves as a reference standard for the study formation in future and also helps to check the quality control studies.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

The authors are highly thankful to Director-General CCRUM, New Delhi for continuous encouragement and providing necessary research facilities to the researchers of the Council.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      The National Formulary of Unani Medicine, Part-1, Ministry of Health and family Welfare, Govt. of India, 2006.

2.      The National Formulary of Unani Medicine, Part-1, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of India, New Delhi, 2011; pp 22.

3.      Johnson DA. Plant Microtechnique. Mc. Graw Hill Book Company Inc., New York and London, 1940.

4.      Wagner H, Bladt S and Zgainski EM. Plant Drug Analysis, A thin layer chromatography Atlas, 2 edn. Affiliated East West Press Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. 1984.

5.      Stahl E. Thin Layer Chromatography-A Laboratory Handbook, George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London, 1996.

6.      The Unani Pharmacopoeia of India, Part-1, Vol-I, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of India, 1997; pp 64.

7.      The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India, Part-1, Vol-VI, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of India, 2008; pp 216.

8.      Useful plants of India, CSIR, New Delhi, 2000.

9.      The Wealth of India (Raw materials), Vol- Vol- I, C.S.I.R, New Delhi, 2005.

10.   The Unani Pharmacopoeia of India, Part-1, Vol-IV, Ministry of Health and family Welfare, Govt. of India, 2007; pp 7.

11.   The Unani Pharmacopoeia of India, Part I Vol-II, Ministry of Health and family welfare, Govt. of India, pp 89 & 62.

12.   Siddiqui Hakim MA. Format for the pharmacopoeial analytical standards of compound formulations, workshop on standardization of Unani drugs, 24-25th January (appendix), Central Council for Research in Unani Medicine, New Delhi, 1995.

13.   Quality control methods for Medicinal plant materials, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1998; pp 25-28.

14.   Horwitz W, Latimer GW. Official method of analysis of AOAC International, 18th Edn. AOAC International: Maryland, 2005; chapter 3, pp 10-11; chapter 10, pp 18-23; chapter 26, pp 17.

 

 

 

Received on 25.08.2020                    Modified on 09.10.2020

Accepted on 16.11.2020                   ©AJRC All right reserved

Asian J. Research Chem. 2021; 14(1):56-60.

DOI: 10.5958/0974-4150.2021.00009.2