Estimation and Validation of Remogliflozin Etabonate in Dosage form and in Bulk Drug by Spectrophotometeric Method
Husnain Fathima, Nirmal. T. Havannavar, Afnaz Jahan
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, MMU College of Pharmacy, Ramanagar - 562159 Karnataka, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: husnainfathima35@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
A simple, sensitive, accurate, rapid and economical Spectrophotometric method was developed for estimation and validation of Remogliflozin Etabonate in pure drug and tablet dosage form. The absorbance was measured at 239.8nm using Ethanol as solvent system. It obeyed Beer’s law at the concentration range of 2-14µg/ml with coefficient of correlation (r2) of 0.997. Limit of detection (LOD) was found to be 1.220µg/ml and Limit of quantitation (LOQ) was found to be 5.220µg/ml. The proposed analytical method was validated according to ICH guidelines, yielded good results concerning range, linearity, precision, accuracy, robustness and ruggedness.
Remogliflozin Etabonate:
Chemically Remogliflozin Etabonate is a 5-methyl-4-[4-1(1-methylethoxy) benzyl]-1(methylethyl)-1H-pyrazol-3-yl-6-0-(ethoxycarbonyl)-β-D-glucopyranoside. It is also be spelled as "Remo”.¹-⁷ It is available in the Indian market as tablet dosage form in the brand names Remo and Remozen.⁸
It is used therapeutically in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and type II diabetes. It is Highly soluble in ethanol, DMSO, DMF, sparingly soluble in aqueous buffers.⁹ Mode of action Remogliflozin Etabonate is a prodrug of drug of the gliflozin. Literature survey reveals that only HPTLC method has been developed for estimation of Remogliflozin Etabonate so there is no spectroscopic method available to estimate either from bulk drug or from the pharmaceutical dosage forms. The present investigation was proposed to estimate Remogliflozin Etabonate in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form by spectroscopic method which is rather simple, sensitive, specific, precise, accurate method. The present work was to develop and validate as per ICH guidelines so the method was developed validated according to ICH guidelines for accuracy, precision, reproductivity, repeatability and robustness.¹⁰
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Materials and reagents:
A gift sample of Remogliflozin Etabonate from Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Mumbai used as a standard drug. Glenmark (Remo 100mg) film coated tablet dosage form bought from the local market. Other chemicals like Ethanol were bought from SD fine chemicals, Mumbai, India.
Apparatus and Equipment Required:
1. UV-Vis double beam spectrophotometer (Model; Shimadzu: 1700S, Japan), Electric Sonicator, Volumetric flasks (10ml, 50ml, 100ml), Calibrated analytical pipettes, Electronic digital balance (Techno, Mumbai)
Preparation of concentration range (Beer’s limit):
Determination of concentration range which obeys the Lambert and Beer’s law is necessary for accuracy and reproducibility in Spectrophotometric analysis for quantitative determination of any drug. For this; Remogliflozin Etabonate stock solution (100µg/ml) was prepared using pure drug in Ethanol. Further dilutions were made using 0.2ml, 0.4ml, 0.6ml, 0.8ml, 1.0ml, 1.2ml, 1.4ml, 1.6ml and 1.8ml of above solution was transferred to a series of 10ml volumetric flasks this gave a series of concentrations ranging from 2 to 18 µg/ml of Remogliflozin Etabonate. The final volume was made up to 10ml mark using Ethanol, sonicated for 5 minutes. The resultant solutions were measured using a double beam uv-vis-spectrophotometer at wave length of 239.8nm against a reagent blank. A calibration curve was plotted with concentration against absorbance. From the graph it was clear that Beer’s law was obeyed in concentration range of 2-14µg/ml and deviation was observed above these concentrations.
Preparation of standard calibration curve:
100mg of pure Remogliflozin Etabonate drug was dissolved in little quantity of Ethanol in a 100ml volumetric flask, the volume was made up to the mark using Ethanol. The solution was sonicated for 10 minutes. This gave a Remogliflozin Etabonate solution with concentration of 1mg/ml (1000µg/ml). 10ml of this solution was further diluted 100ml in volumetric flask using Ethanol to obtain a concentration of 100µg/ml. Further dilutions were made using 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6 and 1.8ml solution was transferred to a series of 10ml volumetric flasks (to Obtain a series of concentrations ranging from 2-14µg/ml of Remogliflozin Etabonate). The final volume was made up to 10ml mark using Ethanol, sonicated for 5 minutes, the absorbances were measured at of 239.8nm against a reagent blank. A calibration curve was plotted with concentration against absorbance.
Estimation of Remogliflozin Etabonate in tablet dosage forms:
Twenty tablets were weighed accurately and powdered. The tablet powder equivalent to 100mg of Remogliflozin Etabonate was transferred into a 100mL volumetric flask and dissolved in little quantity of Ethanol. Then the solution was sonicated for 30 minutes and filtered using whatman filter paper No#41. The filtrate so obtained was diluted with Ethanol to produce 100ml. Further dilutions were made with Ethanol to get required concentrations within Beer’s - Lambert limits. The resultant solutions were measured at wave length of 239.8nm against a reagent blank. The concentration of drug was calculated with the help of standard calibration curve.
ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION:
Validation of an analytical procedure is the process by which it is established, by laboratory studies, that the performance characteristics of the procedure meet the requirements for its intended use. All analytical methods that are intended to be used for analyzing any clinical samples will need to be validated. Validation of analytical methods is an essential but time consuming activity for most analytical development laboratories. It is therefore important to wave length. Understand the requirements of method validation in more detail and the options that are available to allow for optimal utilization of analytical resources in a development laboratory.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Results of Determination of Beer's Limit:
Table:1. Beer’s range for Remogliflozin Etabonate:
|
Sl. No. |
Concentration in µg/ml |
**Absorbance at λmax 239.8nm |
|
1. |
0.0 |
0.000 |
|
2. |
2 |
0.180 |
|
3. |
4 |
0.350 |
|
4. |
6 |
0.535 |
|
5. |
8 |
0.740 |
|
6. |
10 |
0.920 |
|
7. |
12 |
1.101 |
|
8. |
14 |
1.300 |
|
9. |
16 |
1.420 |
|
10. |
18 |
1.860 |
(** Average of three determinations)
Figure: 1. Beer’s limit for Remogliflozin Etabonate pure drug:
(Figure:1 showing Beer's limit for Remogliflozin Etabonate at 239.8nm)
Standard Calibration Curve of Remogliflozin Etabonate:
Table: 2. Absorbance of Remogliflozin Etabonate at various concentrations:
|
Sl. No. |
Concentration in µg/ml |
Absorbance at λmax 239.8nm |
|
1. |
0.0 |
0.000 |
|
2. |
2 |
0.180 |
|
3. |
4 |
0.350 |
|
4. |
6 |
0.535 |
|
5. |
8 |
0.740 |
|
6. |
10 |
0.920 |
|
7. |
12 |
1.101 |
|
8. |
14 |
1.300 |
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Figure: 2. Standard calibration curve for Remogliflozin Etabonate
Results of determination of absorption maxima:
Figure: 3. Absorption maxima of Remogliflozin Etabonate at 239.8nm
Estimation of Remogliflozin Etabonate in tablet Dosage form:
Table: 3. Absorption of drug from tablet dosage form:
|
Volume of stock Solution Used |
Amount of drug (label claim) (µg/ml) |
Absorbance At 239.8nm |
Amount of drug found (µg/ml) |
Percentage purity found ±S.D** (%w/w) |
|
0.2ml |
2 |
0.1088 |
2.014 |
100.70±0.11 |
|
0.6ml |
6 |
0.312 |
6.038 |
100.63±1.41 |
|
1.0ml |
10 |
0.509 |
9.980 |
99.80±0.61 |
|
1.4ml |
14 |
0.693 |
13.979 |
99.85±0.46 |
(** Average of three determinations)
Determination of Accuracy:
Table: 4. Accuracy results for Remogliflozin Etabonate:
|
Brands |
Initial amount (µg/ml) |
Amount of pure drug added (µg/ml) |
Amount recovered (µg/ml) |
% Recovery ±S.D** |
|
REMO |
10 |
8(80%) |
8.026 |
100.32±0.144 |
|
10 |
10(100%) |
9.896 |
98.96±0.226 |
|
|
10 |
12(120%) |
12.025 |
100.20±0.416 |
(**Average of six determinations, n=6)
Determination of Precision:
Table: 5. Precision results for Remogliflozin Etabonate
|
Sl. No |
Conc. in (µg/ml) |
Inter-day absorbance Mean± S.D** |
% C.V |
Intra-day absorbance Mean± S.D** |
% C.V |
|
1. |
8 |
0.412±0.004 |
0.37 |
0.411±0.016 |
0.64 |
|
2. |
10 |
0.511±0.025 |
0.36 |
0.511±0.020 |
0.25 |
|
3. |
12 |
0.604±0.018 |
0.62 |
0.607±0.026 |
0.26 |
(**Average of three determinations, n=3)
Determination of Ruggedness Parameters:
Table:6 Showing Ruggedness parameters:
|
Parameters |
Laboratory |
Name of the instrument |
Manufacturer of the chemicals used |
|
Lab. 1 with analyst I |
M.M.U. College of Pharmacy, Ramanagara |
Shimadzu-(model: 1700S, Japan) double beam UV-vis spectrophotometer |
S.D Fine chemicals, Mumbai. |
|
ab. 2 with analyst II |
Dr. H.L.T. College of Pharmacy, Kengal, Channapatna |
Systronic UV-Vis Double beam spectrophotometer |
Loba chemicals, Mumbai |
Table:7 Showing Ruggedness results for Remogliflozin Etabonate
|
Sl. No |
Brand |
Label claim (mg) |
Lab. 1* with analyst I |
Lab. 2* with analyst II |
||
|
Amount found (mg) |
% Recovery ± S.D** |
Amount found (mg) |
% Recovery± S.D** |
|||
|
1. |
Remo |
10 |
10.07 |
100.7±0.747 |
9.95 |
99.5±0.347 |
(Lab 1* MMU College of pharmacy, Lab 2* Dr. HLT College of pharmacy, **Average of six determinations, n=6)
Determination of Robustness:
Table 8 Showing Robustness results for Remogliflozin Etabonate:
|
Type |
Sl. No. |
Conc. In (µg/ml) |
Change in temperature |
Change in PH 2drops of 0.1N NaOH |
2drops of 0.1N HCl |
|
|
+50C |
-50C |
|||||
|
Absorbance at 239.8nm Mean± S.D** |
||||||
|
Pure |
1 |
8 |
0.406±0.027 |
0.407±0.017 |
0.405±0.012 |
0.407±0.0121 |
|
Drug |
2 |
10 |
0.516±0.023 |
0.514±0.018 |
0.515±0.011 |
0.516±0.028 |
|
|
3 |
12 |
0.610±0.023 |
0.611±0.027 |
0.610±0.050 |
0.609±0.049 |
(**Average of three determinations, n=3)
Table:9 showing calibration data for Remogliflozin Etabonate at 239.8nm:
|
|
Calibration data at 239.8nm |
|
λmax |
239.8nm |
|
Beer’s law limit (µg/ ml) |
2 -14µg/ml |
|
Molar Absorptivity |
1.1156Lmol-1cm-1 |
|
Regression Equation(Y=a+bc) |
Y= 0.050X+0.011 |
|
Slope (b) |
0.01421 to 0.01467 |
|
Intercept(a) |
- 0.004515 to 0.0016752 |
|
Correlation Coefficient (R2) |
0.997 |
|
Limit of detection (LOD) |
1.220µg/ml |
|
Limit of quantitation (LOQ) |
5.220µg/ml |
Determination of Beer’s limit:
The Beer’s limit felled in the range of 2-14µg/ml under given experimental conditions.
Determination of absorption maxima:
100µg/ml stock solution of Remogliflozin Etabonate was prepared and absorbances were measured from 200nm to 340nm. The optimum wave length was found to be 239.8nm
Assay:
Marketed tablets contained Remogliflozin Etabonate were used for the assay. After extraction, proper dilution, measurement, the concentration was determined using standard calibration curve. The amount of drug found in the range of 99.80 – 100.70%w/w
Method validation:
The proposed method was validated in accordance to ICH guidelines.
a) Accuracy:
Percentage of recoveries of Remogliflozin Etabonate in tablets was found in the range of 99.94 – 100.30% w/w
b) precision:
The percent coefficient of variations (% C.V) was between 0.34-0.60 for intra-day and 0.23-0.62 for inter-day absorbances.
c) Repeatability:
Repeat ability was determined by analyzing the sample at the given concentration wavelength for at least six times and it was found that the variability in the results was not more than 0.5%.
d) Reproducibility:
The standard solution of Remogliflozin Etabonate by analyst-I and analyst-II separately. The values obtained were evaluated using F-test and t-test to verify their reproducibility. Calculated value for t-test was found to be less than the tabulated (standard) value it can calculated that no significant difference was observed in the result of analysis.
e) Ruggedness:
Ruggedness of the developed method was determined by changing the analytical tools such as laboratory, instruments, analyst and chemicals. The result (in terms of %RSD) of six determinations indicated that there were no significant variations in the data.
f) Robustness:
Robustness of the method was established by slightly changing the temperature and PH of the reaction mixture. The data so obtained showed no significant variation in the absorption pattern.
g) Limit of detection and limit of quantitation:
Were determined from the standard deviation of y – intercepts of six calibration curves and average slope of six calibration curves. LOD and LOQ of Remogliflozin Etabonate was found to be 1.220µg/ml and 5.220µg/ml respectively.
CONCLUSION:
A new spectrophotometric method was developed to estimate Remogliflozin Etabonate in pure and tablet dosage forms. Ethanolic solutions of Remogliflozin Etabonate was estimated by using UV-spectrophotometer (Shimadzu 1700S, Japan) with matched 1cm quartz cell. It showed maximum absorption at the range of 2-14µg/ml at 239.8nm with coefficient of correlation (R2) of 0.997
The method so developed was validated according to ICH guide lines for accuracy, precision (inter and intra-day precisions), repeatability, reproducibility, ruggedness, robustness etc.
The proposed method was found to be simple, accurate, sensitive, precise, reproducible and rapid.
This method can be successfully employed for routine quantitative analysis of Remogliflozin Etabonate in bulk and tablet dosage form.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
The authors are thankful to Head of the Department of Chemistry.
REFERENCES:
1. Statement on a nonproprietory name adopted by the USAN council
2. "Avolynt Announces Completion of Phase 2b BRID Study of SGLT2 Inhibitor Remogliflozin-Etabonate" (Press release). Avolynt, Inc. Retrieved July 24, 2018.
3. S Mudaliar, AD Armstrong, AA Mavian, R Semmes Connor O, KP Mydlow, J Ye, et al. (November 2012). "Remogliflozin Etabonate, a selective inhibitor of the sodium-glucose transporter 2, improves serum glucose profiles in type I diabetes". Diabetes Care. 35 (11): 2198–200. doi:10.2337/dc12-0508. PMC 3476920.PMID 23011728.
4. RL Dobbins, R Semmes Connor O, A Kapur, C Kapitza, G Golor, I Mikoshiba, et al. (January 2012). "Remogliflozin Etabonate, a selective inhibitor of the sodium-dependent transporter II reduces serum glucose in typeII diabetes mellitus patients". Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 14 (1): 15–22. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01462.x. PMID 21733056.S2CID 23372554.
5. PA Sykes, R Semmes Connor O, R Dobbins, JD Dorey, DJ Lorimer, S Walker, et al. (January 2015). "Randomized trial showing efficacy and safety of twice-daily Remogliflozin Etabonate for the treatment of type II diabetes". Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 17 (1): 94–7. doi:10.1111/dom.12391. PMID 25223369.S2CID 6436562.
6. PA Sykes, LG Kemp, R Dobbins, R Semmes Connor O, RS Almond, OW Wilkison, et al. (January 2015). "Randomized efficacy and safety trial of once-daily Remogliflozin Etabonate for the treatment of type II diabetes". Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 17 (1): 98–101. doi:10.1111/dom.12393. PMID 25238025.S2CID 25280330.
7. "Molecule of the Month: Dapagliflozin". Prous Science. November 2007. Archived from the original on January 6, 2008.
8. S Nakano, K Katsuno, M Isaji, T Nagasawa, B Buchrer, S Walker, W O Wilkison, B Cheatham. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology, 2015;5(3):190-198
9. Y Fujimori, K Katsuno, I Nakashim. Remogliflozin Etabonate, in a novel category of selective low-affinity sodium glucose cotransporter (SGLT2) inhibitors, exhibits antidiabetic efficacy in rodent models. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2008;327(1):268-276
10. Vidhi D, Patel P. Method development and validation of UV spectrophotometric estimation of Remogliflozin Etabonate in bulk and its tablet dosage form. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021;14(4):2042-2044
11. Swapna J, Madhu C, Srivani M, Sumalatha M, Nehalatha Y, Anusha Y. Analytical method Development and Method Validation for the Simultaneous Estimation of Metformin Hydrochloride and Pioglitazone Hydrochloride in Tablet Dosage Form by RP-HPLC, Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2012;2(3):85-89
12. Vichare V, Suryawanshi P, Bhosale J, Dhole S. Simultaneous estimation of Metformin HCl and Pioglitazone HCl by Second Order Derivative UV- Visible Spectrophotometric Method in Tablet Formulation, Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2014;4(3):121-124
13. Sri VK, Anusha M, Reddy RS. A rapid RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation for the Analysis of Linagliptinin Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form, Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 2015;5(1):16-20
14. Pawar J, Sonawane S, Chhajed S, Kshirsagar S. Development and Validation of RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Metformin HCl and Gliclazide, Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2016; 6(3):151-154
15. Rao VB, Vijetha P, Vidyadhara S, Kavita K. A Novel RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation for the Determination of Pioglitazone and Glimepride in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Formulations, Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2017; 7(3): 145-150
16. Gadge SS, Nakod DA, Wasnik PV, Gatkine MT, Zile SS, Mohije HN, Salode LV. Development and Validation of Q-absorbance Ratio method for Simultaneous Estimation of Teniligliptin hydrobromide and Metformin HCl in Multicomponent Dosage form. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 2019; 9(4): 215-218
17. Venkatesh S, Jyothi S, Chiluka R, Padmavati Y. Development of UV-Spectrophotometric Method for the Simultaneous Estimation of Nateglinide and Piperine in combined tablet dosage form. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2020; 10(3): 134-140
18. Farkade K, Tawar M. Analytical Method Validation and Quantitative Analysis for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient and Marketed Formulation of Teniligliptin Hydrobromide by UV Spectroscopy. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2021; 11(3): 195-8
19. More SS, Sonawane SS, Chhajed SS, Kshirsagar JS. Development and Validation of RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Saxagliptin and Dapagliflozin in Tablets. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018; 8(3):145-148
20. Harikrishnan N, Murali Krishna U, Shaik B, Bhavsar V, V Manjusha, Kumar RV. Development and Validation of UV-Spectrophotometric Method of Glibenclamide (Glyburide) in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Formulations. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry. 2010; 3(2): 316-318
Received on 23.10.2021 Modified on 10.01.2022
Accepted on 27.02.2022 ©AJRC All right reserved
Asian J. Research Chem. 2022; 15(2):166-170.