Yamina Benkrima1*, Abdelkader Souigat1, Mohammed Elbar Soudani2,
Mohammed Seyf Eddine Bougoffa3, Zineb Korichi1, Omar Bentouila4
1Ecole normale supérieure de Ouargla, 30000 Ouargla, Algeria.
2Laboratoire de Développement des Energies Nouvelles et Renouvelables dans les Zones Arides et Sahariennes, Faculté des Mathématiques et des Sciences de la Matière, Université Kasdi Merbah Ouargla, Ouargla 30000.
3laboratory of Materials Technology, Department of Materials Science, University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene, Bp 32 El Alia, Bab Ezzouar, 16111, Algeria.
4Department of Matter Sciences, Lenreza Laboratory, Optoelectronics Team, Faculty of Mathematics and Matter Sciences, Kasdi Merbah Ouargla University, Ouargla 30000, Algeria.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: benkrimayamina1@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Where in recent years, a lot of attention has been paid to the structural and chemical properties of mixed bimetallic clusters, this type of cluster is very important in its uses thanks to the possibility of using it according to special requests.
Nano-sized bimetallic groups have received great attention, due to their wide applications in many fields, including optics, magnetism and catalysis1,2, and because they have physical and chemical properties that change in size as a result of the surface change in size, The nanoclusters made of noble metals, especially the PtAun nanocluster, are attractive catalysts3,4. The physical and chemical properties of bimetallic clusters depend not only on the size and shape, but also on the atomic structure of the two metallic elements5. Therefore, the researchers were interested in conducting the current studies to find the new structural and electronic variables possessed by the groups due to their new size6,7.
Both particles of noble metals such as gold and platinum have wide uses, whether in organic chemistry, where they play an important role in protein delivery8, or their important role in cancer treatment9, It also has a great ability to resist fungi10, Because of their potential as optical sensors contributing to phototherapy, they generally play a broad role in sensor synthesis and biomedicine11-13, Platinum particles are also included in the catalytic oxidation of blue carbon, as well as in the general electrochemical behaviors of amino compounds, and generally in many applications in various fields14-16.
DETAIL OF CALCULATIONS:
The electronic structure calculations of PtAun (n = 1-9) clusters were performed using the density functional theory (DFT)17, as implemented in the SIESTA program 18. This code uses norm-conserving Troullier-Martins nonlocal Pseudopotentials19, it also uses flexible basis sets of atomic orbital’s that are of the positional Gaussian type. The exchange correlation energy was evaluated using the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) parameterized by Perdew Burke and Ernserh of (PBE)20, and local density approximation LDA21.
Self-consistent field (SCF) calculations were performed with the estimated convergence criterion of 1 × 10−6 a.u.
For the total energy, we use the double (DZ) basis with polarization function for Pt and Au atoms. With energy shift parameter of 50meV, the change density was calculated in the regular real space network with cut-off energy of 170 Ry. The simulation sets were placed within a large cubic cell with a parameter of 40 Å, Including the necessary spaces between adjacent groups and imposed periodic boundary conditions.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Structural properties of clusters Aun+1 and PtAun (n = 1-9)
Structural characteristics:
The calculated structural properties of pure gold and platinum-doped gold clusters depend on the groups structure, in addition to the positions of the atoms and the average bond length between them, the density function theory (DFT) was chosen. Using generalized gradient approximation (GGA) and local density approximation (LDA) to reach the most stable structures with lower energy. In this work we have come up with the electronic structures of the most stable groups using the application of annealing simulation (SA), which has gone through the following stages:
· The first stage: a random group of atoms is placed in the block simulation box.
· Stage 2: We raise the temperature of the system until it is about 1,000 K in a total of 1,000 iterations.
· Stage 3: System temperature is stable at T = 1000 K for about 500 iterations.
· Stage 4: We gradually lower the temperature of the system until t = 0 K in 1,000 iterations.
Figures 1 and 2 represent the most stable pure gold and platinum-doped groups, respectively.
Figure 1. The most stable Aun (n=2-10) clusters.
Figure 2. The most stable PtAun (n=1-9) clusters.
Adiabatic electronic affinity (AEA) and Vertical electronic affinity (VEA):
using approximation (GGA):
In the following figure, we obtained the values of adiabatic electronic affinity (AEA) and vertical electronic affinity (VEA) for Aun+1 and PtAun (n = 1-9) clusters in terms of cluster size in (GGA) approximation.
Figure 3. Adiabatic electron affinity (AEA) and vertical electron affinity (VEA) of Aun+1 and PtAun (n=1-9) clusters in approximation (GGA).
It is clear from the curve represented in Figure 3 that the adiabatic electron affinity property increases with the size of the studied cluster and this is for both Aun+1 and PtAun clusters in general, It is also clear that the clusters for (n= 4,6,9) are the least stable clusters compared to the other clusters and this is for Aun+1 clusters, While we find that the clusters for the value of (n = 3,6,8) are also less stable compared to the rest of the clusters of type PtAun , In general, it is clear that PtAun clusters are characterized by high stability compared to the Aun+1 clusters, except what was recorded in Au9 cluster which showed higher stability than PtAu8 cluster.
It also shows from the vertical electron affinity change curve for Aun+1 clusters that clusters Au7 and Au9 appear to be less stable compared to the rest of Aun+1 clusters, while PtAu4 and PtAu7 clusters are also less stable compared to other clusters. Thus, in general, we find that PtAun clusters are the most stable compared to Aun+1 clusters, except what was recorded in each of PtAu4 and PtAu8 clusters which are characterized by less stability compared to Au5 and Au8 clusters, we find that they are roughly in agreement with the results of22.
Using approximation (LDA):
We also obtained the curve shown in figure 4, that gives the values of adiabatic electronic affinity (AEA) and vertical electronic affinity (VEA) for Aun+1 and PtAun clusters in approximation (LDA).
Figure 4. Adiabatic electron affinity (AEA) and vertical electron affinity (VEA) of Aun+1 and PtAun (n=1-9) clusters in approximation (LDA).
It is clear from the curve represented in figure 4, that the adiabatic electron affinity property increases with the size of the studied cluster, and this is for each of the Aun+1 and PtAun clusters in general. As it turns out, the clusters are Aun+1 which are for (n =5,8) are the two least stable clusters compared to other pure clusters, in the case of doping clusters and for values (n = 5,9) they are also less stable compared to the rest of the clusters.
It can be concluded that all PtAun clusters show high stability compared to Aun+1 clusters, except in the case of Au10 which showed greater stability compared to its counterpart PtAu9, By comparing our results for gold clusters, we find that they are roughly in agreement with the results of22.
Enthalpy:
The enthalpy values are calculated for clusters of both pure gold and gold impregnated with a platinum atom when we use the approximation (GGA), which is given by the relationship:
H(eV) = E + PV (1)
Where:
E is the energy of the cluster, PV is the value of the pressure exerted on the cluster times the volume of space it occupies.
Where the following two figures (5-a) and (5-b) represent the enthalpy of Aun+1 and PtAun clusters in terms of cluster size in approximations (GGA) and (LDA) respectively.
Figure 5. Enthalpy of Aun+1 and PtAun clusters in approximation: (a) (GGA), (b) (LDA).
Through the curve shown in figure (5-a) and (5-b), it is clear that the enthalpy values of Aun+1 clusters take the lowest values, as the larger the cluster size, the enthalpy remains approximately fluctuating at the same value, Whereas in PtAun clusters, we find that PtAu cluster has the largest value in enthalpy, then it decreases with increasing cluster size, eventually reaching the lowest value at PtAu9 cluster. The enthalpy values strongly indicate that Aun+1 clusters are more stable than PtAun clusters.
Chemical hardness:
The hardness is symbolized by the symbol η, and it is calculated for clusters in order to understand their chemical stability, where the large values of chemical hardness indicate that the cluster is less reactive23,24 and this is in the basic state of the mineral.
The chemical hardness relationship is given by:
(2)
The obtained results are represented in figure 6, where it represents the chemical hardness values for Aun+1 and PtAun clusters in terms of cluster size in both approximations (GGA) and (LDA).
Figure 6. Chemical hardness of Aun+1 and PtAun (n=1-9) clusters in approximate (GGA) and (LDA).
We notice that in general, the chemical hardness values generally decrease with increasing cluster size, and this is for Aun+1 or PtAun clusters in both approximations used, This means that clusters of large size are less chemically reactive and more stable than clusters of small size, in addition, other peaks were recorded at Au5 in (GGA) and (LDA) approximations, as well as the peak at the PtAu4 cluster in (LDA) approximations, where these clusters showed that they are the least chemically reactive than other clusters.
CONCLUSION:
In this paper, we performed DFT simulating annealing calculation of geometric, Chemical and electronic structure of Aun+1 and PtAun clusters with (n = 1-9). Our results show that new structures are obtained for each cluster size. Vertical electronic affinity (VEA) and adiabatic electronic affinity (AEA) are found where it was concluded that for PtAun clusters are the most stable compared to Aun+1 cluster, except for the cluster Au10 Where showed greater stability compared to its cluster counterpart. The enthalpy values strongly indicate that the Aun+1 clusters are more stable than the PtAun clusters, Also the chemical hardness values generally decrease with increasing cluster size.
REFERENCES:
1. Wenqiang Ma, Fuyi Chen, Electronic, magnetic and optical properties of Cu, Ag, Au-doped Si clusters, J Mol Model. 2013;19(10):4555-60. doi: 10.1007/s00894-013-1961-2
2. Michael Martins and Wilfried Wurth, Magnetic properties of supported metal atoms and clusters, Condensed Matter, 2016; Phys. Condens. Matter 28: 503002. doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/28/50/503002
3. Hongfei Li, Huiyan Zhao, Zun Xie, Chenggang Li, Chunyuan bai, Stability and catalytic activity of Au30M12 (M = Au, Ag, Cu, Pt) icosahedral clusters, Chemical Physics Letters. 2021; 763(16):138186. doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2020.138186
4. Yimin Li, Jack Hung-Chang Liu, Cole A. Witham, A Pt-Cluster-Based Heterogeneous Catalyst for Homogeneous Catalytic Reactions: X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy and Reaction Kinetic Studies of Their Activity and Stability against Leaching, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133(34):13527-13533.doi.org/10.1021/ja204191t
5. Mahtout S, Tariket Y, Electronic and magnetic properties of Cr- Gen (15 ≤ n ≤ 29) clusters: a DFT study. Chem Phys. 2016; 472:270-277. doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2016.03.011
6. Xue-Qing Gong, Annabella Selloni, Olga Dulub, Peter Jacobson, Ulrike Diebold, Small Au and Pt Clusters at the Anatase TiO2(101) Surface: Behavior at Terraces, Steps, and Surface Oxygen Vacancies, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130(1): 370-381, doi.org/10.1021/ja0773148
7. Giulia Rossi and Riccardo Ferrando, Global optimization of bimetallic cluster structures. II. Size-matched Ag-Pd, Ag-Au, and Pd-Pt systems, J. Chem. Phys. 2005;122(19):194309. doi.org/10.1063/1.1898224
8. Madhusudhanan J and Sathishkumar K, Gold Nanoparticle for Protein Delivery, Research J. Engineering and Tech. 2013; 4(4):260-263. doi: ijersonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2013-4-4-27
9. Chitneni Vyshuk Rao, Manimaran V, Damodharan N, Review on Methods, Applications and Role of gold nano particles in Cancer Therapy, Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2020; 13(8):3963-3968. doi.org/ 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00701.5
10. Anbarasu Sivaraj, Vanaja Kumar, Revathy Kalyanasundaram, Govindaraju Kasivelu, Biogenic production of Gold nanoparticles using Lactic acid bacteria and their Anti-mycobacterial activity Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2020; 13(9):4391-4394. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00776.3
11. Karunakaran Sulochana Meena, Thyagarajan Venkataraman, Singaravel Ganesan, Prakasa Rao Aruna, Gold–Nanoparticles A Novel Nano-Photosensitizer for Photodynamic Therapy, Asian J. Research Chem. 2011; 4(1):58-63.doi not Available
12. Ketan B. Patil, Narendra B. Patil, Sushmita V. Patil, Vaishnavi K. Patil, Pratik C. Shirsath, Metal based Nanomaterial’s (Silver and Gold): Synthesis and Biomedical application, Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 2020; 10(2):97-106. doi: 10.5958/2231-5713.2020.00018.5
13. Sivasankari G, Boobalan S, Deepa D, Dopamine sensor by Gold Nanoparticles Absorbed Redox behaving metal Complex, Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 2018; 8 (2):83-87. doi: 10.5958/2231-5713.2018.00013.2
14. Yadav OP, Garg VK, Yadav YK, Daoutsali Eleni, Study on Catalytic Oxidation of Carbonmonoxide over Nano-Size Platinum + Alumina Composite, Asian J. Research Chem. 2011;4(6):1005-1008.doi. ajrconline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2011-4-6-35
15. Dushyant Gangwar, Rajdeep Malik, Jasvinder Kaur, Electrochemical Behaviour of 4-Aminoantipyrine at a Platinum Electrode: Kinetic Study, Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(2):551-4. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00089
16. Saudagar RB, Kanchan T. Mandlik, A Review on Gold Nanoparticles, Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2016; 6(1):45-48.doi: 10.5958/2231-5691.2016.00008.3
17. Gabriel UG, Reber AC, Khanna SN, Electronic subshell splitting controls the atomic structure of charged and neutral silver clusters. New. J. Chem. 2013;37(12):3928. doi.10.1039/C3NJ01075A.
18. Soler JM, Artacho E, Gale JD, Garcıa A, Junquera J, Ordejon P,. Sanchez-Portal D, J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2002;14 :2745. doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/14/11/302
19. Troullier N, Martins JL, Efficient pseudopotentials for plane-wave calculations., Phys Rev B Condens Matter; 1991; 43(11):8861-8869. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.43.8861.
20. Chang Q. Sun, Wang Y, Tay BK, Li S, Huang H, and Zhang Y.B, Correlation between the melting point of a nanosolid and the cohesive energy of a surface atom, 2002, J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106(41): 10701-10705.doi.org/10.1021/jp025868l
21. Ceperley DM and. Alder BJ, Ground State of the Electron Gas by a Stochastic Method, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1980; 45(566), doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.566.
22. Peng Shao, Xiao Yu Kunag and YaRu Zhao,Structral, electronic and magentic of gold cluster doped with calcium AunCa(n=1-8), Molecular Physics. 2011;109(2):315-323. 10.1080/00268976.2010.521778
23. Nijamudheen A, Ayan Datta, Effects of Charging on the Structural and Electronic Properties of Aun Nanoclusters (n = 2-20), cluster chemistry (2011). International Conference on Nanoscience, Technology and Societal Implications.
24. Yu X, Zhang X, Wang S and Feng G, Adsorption of Aun (n = 1–4) clusters on Fe3O4(001) B-termination, RSC. Adv. 2015; 5(56) 45446-45453.doi. not Available
Received on 09.04.2022 Modified on 03.07.2022
Accepted on 16.08.2022 ©AJRC All right reserved
Asian J. Research Chem. 2022; 15(5):314-318.