A Simple Group-Interaction Contribution Method for the Prediction of the Freezing Point of Ionic Liquids

 

Khadra Mokadem1*, Belfar Mohemed Lakhdar1, Kaniki Tumba2,

Abdulqader Saad Abed3, Mourad Korichi1

1Kasdi Merbah Ouargla University, B.P. 511, 30000, Ouargla, Algeria.

2Department of Chemical Engineering, Mangosuthu University of Technology, Durban, South Africa.

3Ministry of water Resources, State commission on Operation of Irrigation and Drainage projects,

Water Resources, El Anbar, Iraq.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: mo2kadem@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

A linear model based on group-interaction contributions is proposed for the estimation of the freezing temperature (Tf) of ionic liquids (ILs). This property is important for modelling solid-liquid equilibrium and selecting ionic liquids as reaction media among other things. A database of 66 experimental freezing points different ionic liquids was used to obtain all interaction contribution parameters and model constants. The database included various classes of ionic liquids and a wide range of cation and anion groups., with an average absolute relative deviation of 4,09% and a correlation coefficient of 0,93.

 

KEYWORDS: Group-Interaction Contribution, Ionic Liquids, Freezing Temperature, Molecular Structure, Property Estimation.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

The characteristic temperature at which a liquid turn into liquid is termed as freezing point. The melting and freezing temperatures of the same compound are theoretically identical. However, small differences between the two properties have been observed for molecular liquids while surprisingly high differences, up to 100 K were reported in the case of ionic liquids1. Practically, Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) is the most commonly used technique for both melting and freezing points.

 

Ionic liquids are organic salts that can melt at low temperatures, generally below 373.15 K2.

 

They have been attracting attention from the research community and industry as they have interesting properties that make them credible replacement for volatile organic solvents in industrial processes.

 

Properties which make ionic liquids attractive include:i) low or reduced flammability hazards3; ii) tunable properties4; iii) excellent solvation properties for a variety of organic and inorganic compounds4; iv) high electric conductivities5; v) high thermal stability6; vi) a wide liquid range and vii) a wide electrochemical window7.

 

In this study, a database of experimental measurements has been used to develop predictive models for the freezing point of ionic liquids based on group–interaction contributions (GIC). The present study is therefore the first account of the use of a GIC method for the estimation of the freezing point of ionic liquids. There is need for the development of predictive models for ionic liquids’ properties as experiments are time-consuming. Furthermore, such models can easily be implemented in process simulators for the design of processes incorporating ionic liquids.

 

It is interesting to note that group-interaction contribution (GIC) methods were derived to address the major limitation of conventional group contribution methods8,9, i.e. inability to distinguish between isomers. Thus, the quest for more accurate predictions motivated the approach selected in the present study 66 ILs based on various cations and anions have been during model development.

 

METHODOLOGY:

Data set:

Lazzús, Zhang and co-researchers compiled experimental data for various properties of ionic liquids, including freezing point10-12. Their publication was used to gather a total of 66 ionic liquids. Freezing Temperature were in the range from 185.15 to 466.15 K. Since some ionic liquids were associated with more than one source of experimental data, No data selection was performed prior to the modelling process. We were aware that in so doing, large discrepancies between experimental and calculated or predicted values using model can be expected. However, in the absence of any recommended standard procedure for Tf measurements, it is difficult to identify beyond any reasonable doubt, erroneous values that would be excluded from the database. Hence, all reported data for Freezing Temperature were considered when developing the new model.

 

Altogether, there were 5 cation types represented. Cations included Imidazolium ([IM]), Pyrrolidinium ([PY]), Phosphonium ([P]), Ammonium ([N]), Pyridinium ([py]). Anions contained in the investigated ionic liquids are hexafluorophosphate([PF6]), tetrafluoroborate ([BF4]), bis (trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide([BETI]), Halide ([X]), hexafluoroarsenate ([AsF6]) carboxylates ([R1COO]), trifluoromethylsulfonate ([TfO]), 2,2,2-trifluoro-N (trifluoromethylsulfonyl) acetamide, bis((trifluoromethyl) sulfonyl) imide ([TFSI]), nitrate([NO3]), borate ([R1R2R3R4B]).

 

The training set used for developing the models of this present study consisted of 59 ionic liquids. The validation set comprised 7 data points used to test the predictive ability of developed model. The correlation and the validation sets were selected randomly and care was taken to ensure a fair representation of all substructures in the selected ionic liquids.

 

Development of the method:

In the present study, molecular structure was related to the freezing point of ionic liquids through a three-level estimation: first-order contribution and second-order contribution. This was done according to principles outlined in previous works owed to Constantinou and Gani13, Marrero and Pardillo14 and as well as Mokadem et al.15. The method suggested by these researchers is articulated around the three points.

As shown in the literature, a property denoted Tm can be modelled via GIC by means of the following correlations:

 

       (1)

 

where nj and mk are the number of first and second-order groups of type j and k in the molecule respectively; and are the group-interaction contributions for the first and second-order group respectively.

 

The objective function, the average absolute deviation (AAD), the percent average relative deviation (%AARD) and the correlation coefficient (R2) were calculated as a means to assess the performance of the developed model, according to the following equation:

 

                                       (2)

 

                             (3)

 (4)

           (5)

 

As part of this study, the validation set comprised 66 data points used to test the developed model. Although the correlation and the validation sets were selected randomly, care was taken to ensure that during the modelling process, molecules were decomposed into fragments with all the groups found to have adequate frequency in the selected ILs.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

The linear approach gave the best results for the studied property. After computing group interaction parameters from the experimental data using the computational scheme shown literature15,16, the following equations were obtained:

 

                     (6)

All group group-interaction contribution parameters of first and second orders are reported in Table 1 and 2 respectively. A total of 49 first-order and 5 second order interaction parameters were obtained as part of this study.


 

 

Table 1: First-order structural groups and their interaction

 contributions.

ΔDj/ K

Interactions

No

 

ΔDj/ K

Interactions

No

216.6314

IM & AsF6

26

 

-40.6780

CH3- &  -CH2-

1

330.6314

IM &CH12B11

27

 

0.0000

CH3- &  ˃CH-

2

337.4384

IM &CH6B11Cl6

28

 

9.4897

CH2- & -CH2-

3

252.2834

Py  &  - o -CH3

29

 

14.0698

˃C<&  ˃C<

4

251.2834

Py  &  - p-CH3

30

 

136.0838

>C<&>B<

5

-380.1981

Py  &  -1-CH2

31

 

38.8498

>C< or   >C-- & -SO2-

6

465.6664

py  & Br-

32

 

236.5191

>C<&  -SO3-

7

100.0103

py & -N--

33

 

-6.9890

>C<&  -F

8

0.0000

py &>P< -

34

 

30.9629

H & -CO2-

9

180.0103

py &>B< -

35

 

5.0000

HC=& -CO2-

10

0.0000

N & CH3-

36

 

0.0000

HC=& HC=

11

1.9939

N & -CH2-

37

 

0.0000

BZ & -CO2-

12

267.6562

N & Cl-

38

 

55.4140

>B<&  -F

13

0.0000

N & -N--

39

 

22.2998

IM &  2-CH3

14

0.0000

N &>B< -

40

 

-54.9111

IM &  2-IM or IM+

15

0.0000

N &-CO2-

41

 

0.0000

IM &  4-CH3

16

0.0000

N &>>P<-

42

 

0.0000

IM &  5-CH3

17

0.0000

N &>C--

43

 

265.6242

IM & Cl-

18

0.0000

>P<& CH3-

44

 

281.4815

IM & Br-

19

0.0000

>P<& -CH2-

45

 

253.7981

IM & I- or -I

20

17.2000

>P<&  Cl-

46

 

-72.8581

IM & -N--

21

12.9000

>P<&  Br-

47

 

0.0000

IM &- SO3-

22

19.7760

>P<&  -F

48

 

-89.0025

IM &>B< -

23

0.0000

>P<-  &-NO3-

49

 

27.4342

IM &>C- -

24

 

 

 

 

114.6419

IM &>P<-

25

 


Table 2: Second-order structural groups and their interaction contributions

ΔDj/ K

Interactions

No

-98.0041

H- & IM & -H

1

-37.1338

CH3- &IM & CH3-

2

169.0336

CH3- & IM & -CH2-

3

-176.3782

˃CH- & IM & CH3-

4

238.8909

-SO2- & -N-- & -SO2-

5

 

A comparison between experimental and calculated freezing point temperatures is made in Figure 1 for the linear model. It can be seen that most of the points of the plot are close to the bisector. This indicates consistency between predicted or calculated and experimental data.

 

Figure 1: Comparison between experimental and predicted Tf using the linear model

 

The performance of the developed models can also be evaluated through statistical parameters provided in Tables 3. Due to the lack of similar work in the open literature, no comparison could be made between the presented models except method11.

 

Table 3: The statistical parameters for the developed models

 

This work

Lazzús(2016) 11

Training set

R2

0.930

0.947

%AARD

4.14

5.34

No of data points

59

40

 

Validation set

R2

0.977

0.910

%AARD

3.63

5.25

No of data points

07

23

 

Overall set

R2

0.933

0.939

%AARD

4.09

5.30

No of data points

66

63

 

It is worth emphasising that as compared to conventional group contribution methods, GIC models have the advantage of differentiating between values related to isomers. Considering the large database used, the obtained results (R2 =0.93 as well as % AARD=4.09) suggest that the newly developed models are generally reliable as predictive tools for the freezing point of ionic liquids.

 

CONCLUSION:

New group-interaction contribution-based model linear is presented in this work for the estimation of the freezing point of ionic liquids. They rely on property estimation at three levels: first and second-orders parameters capturing structural features of ILs are determined along with a correction term. Unlike conventional group interaction methods, the new approach presented in this study takes isomerism into account. Its other merit is owed to diverse ionic liquids comprising the database, i.e. altogether 66 ionic liquids as well as the variety of cations and anions involved in the modelling process.


 

Supplementary Materials:


Table 4: Deviation between calculated and predicted Tf data for ILs using the linear GIC model. (RD: Relative deviation)

IUPAC Name

Typical Abbreviation

formula

Tf exp

(K)

Tf cal  ( K)

% RD

1,3-Dimethylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate

C5H9BF4N2

[C1Mim][BF4]

346.75

346.75

0.00

11-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride

C6H11IN2

[EMIM]Cl

306.15

322.18

5.23

1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide

C6H11BrN2

[EMIM]Br

303.15

353.17

16.50

1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium iodine

C6H11IN2

[EMIM]I

312.15

294.38

5.691

1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate

C6H11BF4N2

[EMIM][BF4]

210.15

186.90

11.06

1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium (nonafluoron-butyl)trifluoroborate

C10F12H11BN2

[EMIM][n-C4F9BF3]

234.15

234.15

0.00

1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis((trifluoromethyl) sulfonyl)imide

C8H11F6N3O4S2

[EMIM][NTf2]

223.15

239.59

7.37

1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis((perfluoroethane)sulfonyl)imide

C10H11F10N3O4S2

[EMIM][BETI]

261.15

252.34

3.37

1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate

C6H11F6N2P

[EMIM][PF6]

278.15

273.88

1.53

1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tris(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)methide

C10H11F9N2O6S3

[EMIM][Me]

239.15

239.15

0.00

1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluoroarsenate

C6H11F6N2As

[EMIM][AsF6]

240.15

240.15

0.00

1-Isopropyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate

C7H13PF6N2

[i-C3MI][PF6]

308.15

308.15

0.00

1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate

C8H15BF4N2

[BMIM][BF4]

202.15

202.81

0.32

1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis((trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl)imide

C10H15F6N3O4S2

[BMIM][NTf2]

257.15

255.50

0.64

1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate

C9H15F3N2O3S

[BMIM][TfO]

276.05

276.05

0.00

1-Amyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate

C9H17BF4N2

[C5MIm][BF4]

185.15

210.76

13.83

1-Heptyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate

C11H21BF4N2

[C7MIm][BF4]

191.25

226.66

18.52

1-Octyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate

C12H23BF4N2

[C8MIm][BF4]

192.65

234.62

21.78

1-Nonyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate

C13H25BF4N2

[C9MIm][BF4]

193.15

242.57

25.58

1-Decyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate

C14H27BF4N2

[C10MIm][BF4]

248.45

250.52

0.83

1-Undecyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate

C16H31ClN2

[C11MIm][BF4]

270.65

258.47

4.49

1-Dodecyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate

C16H31BF4N2

[C12MIm][BF4]

280.55

266.42

5.03

Tetraethylammonium bis(perfluoroethane) sulfonyl)imide

C17H33BF4N2

[C13MIM][BF4]

290.45

274.38

5.53

1-Tetradecyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate

C18H35BF4N2

[C14MIm][BF4]

302.45

282.33

6.65

1-Pentadecyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate

C19H37BF4N2

[C15MIM][BF4]

308.15

290.28

5.79

1-Hexadecyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate

C20H39BF4N2

[C16MIM][BF4]

318.25

298.23

6.29

1-Octadecyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate

C22H43BF4N2

[C18MIM][BF4]

337.65

314.13

6.96

1,2-Dimethyl-3-ethylimidazolium chloride

C7H13ClN2

[M1,2E3IM]Cl

376.15

334.15

11.16

1,2-Dimethyl-3-ethylimidazolium bromide

C7H13BrN2

[M1,2E3IM]Br

365.15

365.15

0.00

1,2-Dimethyl-3-ethylimidazolium bis ((trifluoromethyl) sulfonyl) imide

C9H13F6N3O4S2

[M1,2E3IM][TFSI]

255.15

251.57

1.40

2,4,5-Trimethylimidazolium chloride

C6H11ClN2

[M2,4,5IM]Cl

441.15

441.15

0.00

1,2-Dimethyl-3-ethylimidazolium bis((perfluoroethane)sulfonyl )imide

C11H13F10N3O4S2

[M1,2E3IM][BETI]

248.15

264.32

6.51

2,3-Dimethyl-1-ethylimidazolium bis (trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide

C9H13F6N3O4S2

[EDMIM][NTf2]

248.15

251.57

1.38

1,2-dimethyl-3-propylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate

C8H15F6N2P

[DMPIM][PF6]

291.15

291.15

0.00

1,2-diethyl-3-propylimidazolium chloride

C8H15ClN2

[DMPIM]Cl

316.15

342.11

8.21

1,2-dimethyl-3-propylimidazolium bis((perfluoroethane) sulfonyl)imide

C12H15F10N3O4S2

[DMPIM][BETI]

247.15

247.15

0.00

1,2,3,4,5-Quinarymethylimidazolium iodine

C8H15IN2

[M5IM]I

396.15

413.91

4.48

Quinarymethylimidazolium bis((trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl)imide

C10H15F6N3O4S2

[M5IM][TFSI]

381.15

359.12

5.77

1,2,3,4,5-Quinarymethylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate

C8H15F6N2P

[M5IM][PF6]

389.15

393.41

1.09

N,N0-dimethylpyrrolidinium hydrogen maleate

C10H17NO4

[P11]M

319.65

319.65

0.00

N,N0-dimethylpyrrolidinium hydrogen phthalate

C14H19NO4

[P11]P

314.65

314.65

0.00

N-butyl pyridinium bromide

C9H14NBr

[Bpy]Br

315.00

315.00

0.00

N-butyl pyridinium tetrafluoroborate

C9H14BF4N

[Bpy][BF4]

251.00

251.00

0.00

N-butyl pyridinium bis((trifluoromethyl) sulfonyl)imide

C11H14F6N2O4S2

[Bpy][TFSI]

224.00

224.00

0.00

1-Hexadecyl-3-methylpyridinium hexafluorophosphate

C22H40F6NP

[C16Mpy][PF6]

334.15

334.15

0.00

1-Octadecyl-4-methylpyridinium hexafluorophosphate

C24H44F6NP

[C18M'py][PF6]

350.15

349.60

0.15

1-Hexadecyl-4-methylpyridinium hexafluorophosphate

C22H40F6NP

[C16M'py][PF6]

333.15

333.69

0.16

1-Butyl-4-(dimethylamino)pyridinium bromide

C11H19N2Br

[bDMApy]Br

433.00

400.09

7.59

1-Hexyl-4-(dimethylamino) pyridinium bromide

C13H23N2Br

[hDMApy]Br

416.00

416.00

0.00

Tetraethylammonium chloride

C8H20ClN

[TEA][Cl]

364.15

364.15

0.00

Tetraethylammonium tetrafluoroborate

C8H20BF4N

[TEA][BF4]

318.15

318.15

0.00

Tetraethylammonium tris(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)methide

C12H20F9NO6S3

[TEA][Me]

302.15

302.15

0.00

Tetraethylammonium bis((perfluoroethane) sulfonyl)imide

C12H20F10N2O4S2

[N2222][BETI]

348.15

340.77

2.19

Tetraethylammonium hexafluorophosphate

C8H20F6NP

[N2222][PF6]

215.15

215.15

0.00

Tetraethylammonium bis((trifluoromethyl) sulfonyl)imide

C10H20F6N2O4S2

[N2222][TFSI]

371.15

328.02

11.61

Tetrabutylammonium bis((trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl)imide

C18H36F6N2O4S2

[N4444][TFSI]

341.15

391.64

14.80

Tetrabutylammonium tris(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)methide

C20H36F9NO6S3

[N4444][Me]

307.15

365.76

19.08

Tridecylmethylphosphonium chloride

C31H66ClP

[P1,103]Cl

374.15

374.15

0.00

Tridecylmethylphosphonium bromide

C31H66BrP

[P1,103]Br

369.85

369.85

0.00

Tridecylmethylphosphonium nitrate

C31H66NO3P

[P1,103][NO3]

356.95

356.95

0.00

 


REFERENCES:

1.      Villanueva J. S. M. Thermal Properties of Pure Ionic liquids, in: A.P.D.L.R.a.F.J.H. Fernandez (Ed.) Ionic Liquids in Separation Technology, Elsevier. 2014; ISBN: 9780444632623

2.      Plechkova N. V. Seddon K.R., Applications of ionic liquids in the chemical industry, Chemical Society Reviews. 2008; 37, 123-150.doi.org/10.1039/B006677J

3.      Fox D. M. Gilman J.W. Morgan A.B. Shields J.R. Maupin P.H., Lyon R.E. De Long H.C. Trulove P.C. Flammability and thermal analysis characterization of imidazolium-based ionic liquids, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2008; 47:6327-6332. DOI10.1021/ie800665u

4.      Rogers R. D. Seddon K.R. Ionic liquids--solvents of the future?, Science.2003;302:792-793.DOI: 10.1126/science.1090313

5.      Trulove P. C. Mantz R.A. Electrochemical properties of ionic liquids, in, Wiley-VCH: Morlenbach., 2003. ISBN 3-527-30612-9

6.      Dupont J. On the solid, liquid and solution structural organization of imidazolium ionic liquids, Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society.2004;15:341-350. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-50532004000300002

7.      Schröder U. Wadhawan J. D. Compton R. G. Marken, F. Suarez P. A. Z. Consorti C. S Consorti. F. Roberto de Souzab and Dupont J. Water-induced accelerated ion diffusion: voltammetric studies in 1-methyl-3-[2,6-(S)-dimethylocten-2-yl]imidazolium tetrafluoroborate, 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate and hexafluorophosphate ionic liquids. J. New J. Chem. 2000;24:1009–1015.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1039/B007172M

8.      Marrero‐MorejónJ. GaniR.Group-contribution based estimation of pure component properties, Fluid Phase Equilibria. 2001;183:183-208.DOI:10.1016/S0378-3812(01)00431-9

9.      Pardillo-Fontdevila E. González-Rubio R. A group-interaction contribution approach. A new strategy for the estimation of physico-chemical properties of branched isomers, Chemical Engineering Communications. 1998; 163:245-254.

10.   Zhang S. Sun N., He X. Lu X. Zhang X. Physical properties of ionic liquids: database and evaluation, Journal of physical and chemical reference data.. 2006. 35:1475-1517. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2204959

11.   S. Zhang, X. Lu, X. Li, Q. Zhou, X. Zhang, S. Li Ionic Liquids: Physicochemical Properties, 1st Edition, Elsevier Science.2009.

12.   Lazzús J. A. A Group Contribution Method For Predicting The Freezing Point Of Ionic Liquids, Periodica Polytechnica Chemical Engineering. 2016; Doi: 10.3311/Ppce.9082. DOI: 10.3311/PPce.9082

13.   Constantinou L. Gani R. New group contribution method for estimating properties of pure compounds, AIChE Journal. 1994 ;40,1697-1710. DOI:10.1002/AIC.690401011

14.   Marrero‐Morejón J. Pardillo‐Fontdevila E. Estimation of pure compound properties using group‐interaction contributions, AIChE journal.,1999 ;45: 615-621. doi.org/10.1002/aic.690450318

15.   Mokadem K. Korichi M. Tumba K. A new group-interaction contribution method to predict the thermal decomposition temperature of ionic liquids, Original Research Article, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems.2016; 157:189-195.

16.   Mokadem K. Korichi M. Group - Interaction Contribution Approach for Prediction of Electrochemical Properties of Ionic Liquids, Computer Aided Chemical Engineerin. 2016;38:451-456. DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2020.112462

 

 

 

 

Received on 08.08.2022                    Modified on 28.08.2022

Accepted on 19.09.2022                   ©AJRC All right reserved

Asian J. Research Chem. 2022; 15(6):404-408.

DOI: 10.52711/0974-4150.2022.00071