The Journey of Extraction:

Review from Ancient Practices to Modern Technologies

 

Puneeth Raj R. M1, Ashish Kumar2, Anupam Srivastava3, Mohar Pal Meena4,

Reetesh Ramnani5

1MD Scholar, Department of Rasashastra and Bhaishajya Kalpana NIA-Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

2MD Scholar, Department of Rasashastra and Bhaishajya Kalpana NIA-Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

3Professor and Head, Department of Rasashastra and Bhaishajya Kalpana NIA-Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

4Professor, Department of Rasashastra and Bhaishajya Kalpana NIA-Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

5Assistant Professor. Department of Rasashastra and Bhaishajya Kalpana NIA-Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: puneethjayesh@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

Introduction: Extraction plays a vital role in herbal drug formulation by isolating therapeutic phytoconstituents from raw materials. Traditional methods, although effective, often lack efficiency and standardization, while modern techniques aim for higher yield, selectivity and sustainability. This review categorizes and evaluates extraction methods conventional, non-conventional, emerging and traditional Ayurvedic to explore their comparative efficiency, applications and potential for integration. Materials and Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted to analyse various extraction techniques. Conventional techniques like maceration, infusion, percolation, decoction and Soxhlet were studied alongside non-conventional methods such as supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE), pulsed electric field extraction (PEF) and subcritical water extraction (SWE). Recent emerging methods - natural deep eutectic solvent (NADES) based extraction, pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE), flash extraction, ohmic heating-assisted extraction (OHAE), enzyme ultrasound synergistic extraction (EUSE) and ionic liquid-based extraction (ILBE) were critically examined. Traditional Ayurvedic techniques including Panchavidha Kashaya Kalpana and Arka Kalpana were reviewed in context of ancient pharmaceutics and modern applicability. Results: Conventional methods offer foundational benefits but often involve longer durations and high solvent usage. Non-conventional techniques, especially UAE and MAE, provide enhanced efficiency and target-specific extractions. Emerging methods such as NADES and ILBE demonstrate improved selectivity, eco-friendliness and high extraction yields, though challenges like viscosity and cost remain. Ayurvedic techniques including Swarasa, Kalka, Kwatha, Hima, Phanta and Arka ensure holistic and energetically potent formulations, with tailored approaches for different herb types. Each method is suited to specific compound profiles and therapeutic intents. Conclusion: A comparative review reveals that a hybridized extraction approach, combining traditional Ayurvedic wisdom with advanced green technologies, can lead to more potent, efficient and sustainable herbal products. Bridging these domains fosters innovation while preserving ancient therapeutic knowledge

 

KEYWORDS: Arka Kalpana, Extraction Technique, Herbal extraction, Panchavidha Kashaya Kalpana.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Extraction1 is a fundamental process in pharmaceutical, nutraceutical and traditional medicine systems. It involves the separation of bioactive constituents using appropriate solvents or techniques aiming to obtain concentrated, stable and efficacious therapeutic products. In phytochemistry and pharmacognosy, the choice of extraction method significantly impacts the chemical profile, potency and stability of the final preparation.

Extraction methods can be broadly classified into conventional and non-conventional techniques2. Conventional techniques include maceration, infusion, percolation, decoction, Soxhlet extraction, hydro-distillation and steam distillation. Non-conventional techniques comprise supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE), microwave hydro-diffusion and gravity (MHG), pulsed electric field extraction (PEF) and subcritical water extraction (SWE). Emerging techniques include natural deep eutectic solvent (NADES)-based extraction, pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE), flash extraction, ohmic heating-assisted extraction (OHAE), enzyme ultrasound synergistic extraction (EUSE) and ionic liquid-based extraction (ILBE) which focus on greener, more efficient and sustainable extraction processes.

 

The extraction process is crucial for isolating volatile compounds such as essential oils3, alkaloids, phenolics and glycosides which are responsible for the pharmacodynamic action of many herbal formulations. Particularly for aromatic and medicinal plants, volatile oils comprising monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, alcohols, aldehydes and esters are isolated using methods like hydro-distillation and steam distillation. These oils are known for their antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and anxiolytic properties making their extraction a key area in natural product research and formulation.

 

In Ayurvedic pharmaceutics, various kalpanas or dosage forms are formulated to effectively extract and deliver the therapeutic constituents of medicinal substances. The foundational extraction techniques are grouped under panchavidha kashaya kalpana4, which include swarasa (juice), kalka (paste), kwatha (decoction), hima (cold infusion), and phanta (hot infusion). These are primarily aqueous-based preparations. Supporting these are upakalpanas, which are auxiliary or preparatory processes that help refine and enhance the efficacy of the main formulations. In addition to these, several other kalpanas involve different extraction methods suited to specific types of active principles. These traditional formulations reflect the sophisticated understanding of extraction techniques in ancient Ayurveda. However, with advancements in dosage form development and the need for increased efficacy, reduced dosage volume, better stability and improved palatability, new types of formulations evolved. Among these, Arka Kalpana5 refers to a specialized process of preparing Arka distillate obtained by controlled heating and condensation of herbal, mineral or animal substances in a vessel known as Arka Yantra. This method extracts the volatile and subtle constituents of the drugs and results in a clear, aromatic, water-based product that is refined and highly bioavailable.

 

Given the contemporary need to integrate traditional wisdom with modern analytical precision, this review aims to critically evaluate current extraction procedures. Specifically, it compares various conventional and modern techniques for volatile and hydroalcoholic extract preparations.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Relevant peer-reviewed journal articles, authoritative textbook published in the last two decades were systematically reviewed through database searches (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar) to ensure comprehensive coverage of both traditional and emerging techniques.

 

Techniques such as maceration, infusion, decoction, percolation, Soxhlet extraction and the Ayurvedic Panchavidha Kashaya Kalpana, Arka Kalpana were included to represent classical and culturally significant practices. Meanwhile, advanced methodologies like SFE, UAE and EUSE reflect the evolving landscape of phytopharmaceutical processing. The selection criteria emphasized reproducibility, extraction efficiency, solvent compatibility and relevance to research and small-scale formulation development. The following sections describe each method in detail, highlighting their mechanisms, practical applications and limitations based on current literature and Industrial practices.

 

 

1. Conventional Extraction Techniques:

1.1 Maceration6

Maceration is one of the oldest and simplest methods used to extract bioactive compounds from plant material. In this technique, the crude drug is immersed in a solvent (commonly water, ethanol or a hydroalcoholic mixture) at room temperature for several days. The plant material is usually crushed to increase surface area and maximize solvent penetration. During this period, the solvent dissolves the active constituents, forming a concentrated extract. Occasional agitation helps improve the extraction rate. After the stipulated time (ranging from 3 to 7 days), the mixture is filtered to separate the extract from the plant residue. This method is particularly useful for heat-sensitive compounds and soft plant parts. However, it has limitations such as lower efficiency and longer processing time compared to modern techniques. It is often used in small-scale herbal preparations and traditional medicine practices. Maceration is economical and requires minimal equipment, making it a widely used technique in many developing countries.

 

1.2 Infusion7:

Infusion is a method that closely resembles the way tea is prepared, typically used for soft plant parts like leaves, flowers and green stems. The technique involves adding hot water to the plant material and allowing it to steep for a short time, usually 15 to 30 minutes. This method is ideal for extracting water-soluble and heat-stable constituents such as flavonoids, tannins and glycosides. After steeping, the liquid is filtered and consumed or processed further. Infusion is easy to perform and requires only basic tools such as a kettle or covered vessel. It is frequently used in herbal medicine to prepare soothing, aromatic, and mild remedies. Though simple, the method is not suitable for hard or woody plant parts and yields a lower concentration of extracts compared to percolation or Soxhlet methods. Nonetheless, it is widely practiced in traditional systems due to its speed, convenience and palatability.

 

1.3 Percolation8:

Percolation is an exhaustive extraction process that involves the slow passage of solvent through a packed column of powdered plant material. A cylindrical vessel known as a percolator is used, into which the powdered crude drug is evenly packed. The solvent is added from the top and allowed to flow through by gravity. The extract is collected from the bottom over a period of hours or days until all soluble constituents are removed. Unlike maceration, percolation ensures a more complete extraction and is better suited for large-scale pharmaceutical use. It is especially effective for extracting alkaloids, glycosides and other moderately polar to polar phytochemicals. This method maintains a constant concentration gradient, which Favors continuous diffusion of solutes into the solvent. The process may require optimization of variables such as particle size, solvent polarity and flow rate.

 

1.4 Decoction:9

Decoction is a method that uses boiling to extract active ingredients from tough or woody plant materials such as roots, bark and seeds. The crude drug is usually coarsely powdered and boiled in water for 15–60 minutes. The mixture is then cooled and filtered to obtain the decoction. This technique allows the breakdown of rigid cell walls and releases compounds that are not extractable through simple maceration or infusion. Decoctions are often used in Ayurveda and traditional Chinese medicine for preparing formulations like Kwatha. The high temperature may degrade heat-sensitive constituents but is beneficial for obtaining alkaloids, bitters and polysaccharides. Decoctions should be consumed within a short time frame due to microbial growth. Despite modern alternatives, decoction remains a preferred method for preparing household remedies and traditional formulations.

 

1.5 Soxhlet Extraction:10

Soxhlet extraction is a laboratory-based technique used for efficient and continuous extraction of compounds using an organic solvent. It is particularly effective for thermostable compounds. In this method, the solvent is repeatedly vaporized, condensed and siphoned through the plant material. This allows thorough washing of the material without the need to replenish the solvent manually. Soxhlet apparatus comprises a distillation flask, extraction chamber and condenser. The method is advantageous in terms of completeness of extraction and solvent recycling. However, it requires heat, time and proper solvent selection. Soxhlet is widely used for lipid, alkaloid and resin extraction in both analytical and industrial settings.

 

2.Non-Conventional Extraction Techniques:

2.1 Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE):11

Supercritical fluid extraction employs gases (commonly CO₂) in a supercritical state, where they possess properties of both liquids and gases. In this state, CO₂ acts as a highly selective solvent that can extract non-polar and thermolabile compounds efficiently. This method operates under specific temperature (31°C) and pressure (74 bar) conditions and the extracted material contains no residual solvents, making it ideal for food and pharmaceutical applications. The process is also customizable: modifiers like ethanol can be added to extract polar compounds. SFE is used for obtaining high-purity extracts. Though equipment and operational costs are high, its eco-friendliness, efficiency and scalability make it a preferred green technology in modern industries.

 

2.2 Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction (UAE):12

Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction utilizes high-frequency sound waves (typically 20–100 kHz) to enhance the extraction of bioactive compounds from plant materials. These sound waves create cavitation bubbles in the solvent, which collapse violently and generate localized high temperatures and pressures. This disrupts plant cell walls, increasing solvent penetration and mass transfer of solutes into the solvent. UAE is effective at low temperatures, making it suitable for thermolabile compounds such as polyphenols, flavonoids, and essential oils. The technique is relatively quick and requires minimal solvent, aligning with green chemistry principles. UAE has been widely used for extracting compounds from ginger, garlic, and citrus peels. Although it offers excellent energy efficiency and is easy to integrate with other methods, limitations include uneven distribution of ultrasonic energy in large volumes and possible degradation of sensitive constituents if parameters are not properly optimized.

 

2.3 Microwave-Assisted Extraction (MAE):13

Microwave-Assisted Extraction uses microwave energy (typically 300 MHz to 300 GHz) to rapidly heat the solvent and plant matrix, causing cell rupture and improved diffusion of intracellular compounds. The technique relies on the dipolar rotation and ionic conduction of polar solvents and solutes, leading to selective heating. MAE significantly reduces extraction time and solvent use, making it suitable for thermolabile and moderately polar compounds such as alkaloids, saponins, and phenolics. It has been successfully applied to extract active ingredients from plants like turmeric, green tea, and Eucalyptus. The main advantages include uniform heating, enhanced yield, and ease of scaling up. However, it may not be ideal for non-polar solvents or compounds and requires specialized microwave reactors to avoid overheating and degradation.

 

2.4 Accelerated Solvent Extraction (ASE):14

Accelerated Solvent Extraction, also known as Pressurized Liquid Extraction, employs elevated temperatures (50–200°C) and pressures (10–20 MPa) to maintain the solvent in a liquid state above its boiling point. This increases the solubility and diffusion rate of solutes, allowing faster and more exhaustive extraction. ASE is particularly effective for lipophilic compounds like sterols, carotenoids, and fatty acids. It is widely used in environmental, food, and pharmaceutical analysis. The method allows precise control of temperature, pressure, and solvent volume, leading to reproducible results. Although ASE offers high throughput and automation compatibility, the need for costly instrumentation and risks of compound degradation at high temperatures are its main limitations.

 

2.5 Enzyme-Assisted Extraction (EAE):15

Enzyme-Assisted Extraction employs hydrolytic enzymes such as cellulases, pectinases, and proteases to degrade plant cell walls and release bound phytoconstituents. The method works under mild conditions (30–50°C) and is ideal for polysaccharides, phenolics, and glycosides. EAE improves yield by increasing cell permeability and breaking down complex matrices. It is especially useful for hard tissues like seeds and peels. Enzymatic pre-treatment is eco-friendly and can be combined with techniques like ultrasound or microwave for synergistic effects. EAE has been effectively applied in extracting compounds from soya, pomegranate, and citrus waste. Challenges include enzyme cost, activity optimization, and the need to inactivate enzymes post-extraction.

 

2.6 Microwave Hydro-Diffusion and Gravity       (MHG):16

Microwave Hydro-Diffusion and Gravity is a solvent-free microwave-based technique that facilitates the diffusion of volatile compounds from plant tissues using gravity. In MHG, fresh plant material is heated by microwave irradiation without any added solvent, causing internal moisture to act as an extraction medium. Volatile compounds are carried by this moisture to a condenser, where they are collected as distillate. MHG is particularly suited for essential oils and aromatic compounds from fresh herbs like rosemary, lavender, and basil. The method is fast, energy-efficient, and avoids solvent use entirely. However, it requires specific microwave-compatible equipment and is not suitable for dry or non-aromatic plant materials.

 

2.7 Pulsed Electric Field Extraction (PEF):17

Pulsed Electric Field Extraction involves applying short bursts of high-voltage electric fields (typically 0.1–80 kV/cm) to plant tissues immersed in a solvent. This causes electroporation—disruption of cell membranes—leading to increased mass transfer of intracellular compounds. PEF is a non-thermal technique ideal for preserving heat-sensitive constituents like antioxidants, vitamins, and pigments. It has been used effectively for juice extraction and improving yields from grape skins, sugar beet, and olives. The major advantages include minimal thermal damage, high efficiency, and rapid processing. However, it requires precise control of electric parameters and may not be cost-effective for small-scale setups due to equipment complexity.

 

2.8 Subcritical Water Extraction (SWE):18

Subcritical Water Extraction uses water at temperatures between 100°C and 374°C under high pressure (to maintain it in the liquid state) to extract a range of polar and semi-polar compounds. At subcritical conditions, water exhibits decreased dielectric constant, mimicking organic solvents like methanol or ethanol. This allows it to solubilize phenolics, alkaloids, and glycosides efficiently. SWE is considered a green technology and is increasingly used in pharmaceutical and nutraceutical industries. It eliminates the use of harmful organic solvents and provides good selectivity by adjusting temperature. However, SWE systems are capital-intensive, and high temperatures can degrade certain labile compounds if not optimized.

3. Emerging and Advanced Extraction Techniques:

3.1 Natural Deep Eutectic Solvent (NADES)-Based Extraction:19

Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents (NADES) are a novel class of green solvents formed by mixing natural primary metabolites such as sugars, amino acids, or organic acids, which form eutectic mixtures with low melting points. These solvents are biodegradable, non-toxic, and customizable based on the desired polarity. NADES are being increasingly used for the extraction of flavonoids, alkaloids, and saponins due to their tunable solvation properties and ability to dissolve a wide range of phytochemicals. Compared to conventional solvents, NADES exhibit better selectivity and higher extraction yields in many cases. Moreover, the use of NADES aligns with sustainable and safe manufacturing practices. However, challenges like high viscosity and difficulties in solvent recovery still need to be addressed.

3.2 Pressurized Hot Water Extraction (PHWE):20

Also known as Enhanced Solvent Extraction, Pressurized Hot Water Extraction (PHWE) involves the use of water at elevated temperatures (100–374°C) and high pressures to keep it in a liquid state. PHWE is closely related to Subcritical Water Extraction but focuses more on continuous flow or batch reactors for larger-scale applications. It significantly enhances the extraction of phenolics, polysaccharides, and glycosides from plant matrices without the use of organic solvents. By manipulating temperature and pressure, the polarity of water can be adjusted to target different classes of compounds. This makes PHWE both eco-friendly and versatile. The technique is increasingly adopted in the food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical industries.

 

3.3 Flash Extraction:21

Flash Extraction, also known as Instantaneous Controlled Pressure Drop (Dic—Détente Instantanée Contrôlée), is a new thermo-mechanical method that enables ultra-fast extraction of phytoconstituents. It involves subjecting plant material to high-pressure saturated steam for a short time, followed by an abrupt pressure drop. This causes instant auto vaporization of intracellular water, expansion of the material, and cell wall rupture, allowing efficient compound release. The whole process takes only seconds to minutes and is particularly useful for essential oils and antioxidants. Flash Extraction significantly reduces energy consumption and solvent use. It is still under optimization but has high potential for industrial scale-up.

 

3.4 Ohmic Heating-Assisted Extraction (OHAE):22

Ohmic Heating-Assisted Extraction (OHAE) is an emerging technique that applies electrical current directly through the plant-water mixture, causing rapid and uniform heating via electrical resistance. This enhances cell permeability and facilitates the release of intracellular contents. Unlike conventional heating, ohmic heating ensures minimal thermal degradation and shorter processing times. It is especially suited for aqueous extractions of polysaccharides, proteins, and antioxidants. Though still under evaluation for herbal matrices, it is gaining interest due to its energy efficiency and potential for continuous processing.

 

3.5 Enzyme Ultrasound Synergistic Extraction (EUSE):23

Enzyme Ultrasound Synergistic Extraction (EUSE) combines enzymatic hydrolysis with ultrasound application to enhance the release of plant metabolites. The enzyme softens or breaks down the cellular matrix, while ultrasound-induced cavitation helps release the compounds rapidly. This combination significantly increases yield and reduces extraction time compared to using either method alone. EUSE has shown excellent results in extracting phenolic acids, flavonoids, and essential oils, especially from complex matrices such as peels, roots, and seeds. The process is considered a potent green alternative and is currently under pilot-scale implementation.

 

3.6 Ionic Liquid-Based Extraction (ILBE):24

Ionic liquids (ILs) are salts in the liquid state that consist of anions and cations with low melting points, often below 100°C. They are customizable for polarity and are non-volatile, non-flammable, and thermally stable. ILs are increasingly used as solvents for extracting alkaloids, steroids, and essential oils due to their strong solvating power and ability to disrupt plant cell walls. Although ILs are efficient and selective, their high cost and potential environmental toxicity are limiting factors. Ongoing research is focused on developing biodegradable ionic liquids (Bio-ILs) to overcome these issues.

 

4. Traditional Ayurvedic Method:

Panchavidha Kashaya Kalpana encompasses five fundamental Ayurvedic methods for preparing herbal formulations: Swarasa (expressed juice), Kalka (paste), Kwatha (decoction), Hima (cold infusion) and Phanta (hot infusion). These techniques are designed to extract and deliver the therapeutic properties of herbs effectively, with each method tailored to specific types of plant materials and desired therapeutic outcomes.

 

4.1 Swarasa25 (expressed juice):

Swarasa involves extracting juice from fresh herbs. The plant material is cleaned, crushed into a paste, and then squeezed through a cloth to obtain the juice. This method is considered highly potent, delivering active constituents in their most unaltered form.

In traditional Ayurvedic pharmaceutics, Swarasa is esteemed as one of the most potent forms of herbal preparation. While it is ideally extracted from fresh plant materials, ancient texts also delineate methods for obtaining Swarasa from dried herbs when fresh counterparts are unavailable. These time-honored techniques ensure the effective extraction of therapeutic constituents, preserving the efficacy of herbal remedies.

 

1.     Soaking Method (Nishpidaṇa):

This method is preferred for dried herbs that are soft or fragile in nature. According to Ayurvedic principles, gentle soaking overnight helps in preserving the subtle, water-soluble active constituents without exposing them to heat, which can degrade delicate phytochemicals like volatile oils or certain glycosides. The softened herb releases these constituents effectively, maintaining their potency and therapeutic efficacy.

 

2.     Decoction Method (Kwathana):

Decoction is chosen when dealing with hard, tough or fibrous dried herbs, where simple soaking fails to extract sufficient active principles. Ayurvedic texts emphasize that boiling with an appropriate ratio of water helps break down the dense plant matrix, enabling the release of heat-stable, water-soluble compounds such as alkaloids, tannins and phenolics. The heat-induced extraction enhances therapeutic strength, making decoctions suitable for chronic ailments where deep tissue penetration and sustained effects are desired, such as in respiratory disorders or digestive imbalances.

 

3.     Putapaka Method:

This traditional technique is specifically applied when extracting juice is difficult due to the herb’s inherent toughness or resistance even in fresh form. The Ayurvedic rationale involves applying controlled heat via a mud-coated bolus, which creates a slow, penetrating thermal effect that softens the herb and activates latent phytoconstituents without causing rapid degradation. This method is considered superior for herbs that require intensified potency and altered pharmacodynamics.

 

4.2 Kalka26(paste):

Kalka refers to a paste obtained by grinding fresh or dried herbs with minimal water. In Ayurveda, this preparation is considered vital for retaining the full spectrum of phytochemicals, including both water-soluble and fat-soluble constituents. Unlike other methods that may filter out fibrous or insoluble components, Kalka ensures comprehensive utilization of the plant’s active principles.

 

 

4.3 Kwatha27(decoction):

In traditional Ayurvedic pharmaceutics, the preparation of Kwatha (decoction) is a fundamental method for extracting water-soluble bioactive compounds from herbs. The ratio of herb to water and the extent of reduction during boiling are critical factors influencing the potency and therapeutic efficacy of the decoction.

 

Traditional Ratios in Kwatha Preparation.:

1.     1:4 Ratio:

This method is employed for herbs with softer textures, such as leaves and flowers. One part of coarse powdered herb is boiled with four parts of water and reduced to one-fourth of its original volume. This approach allows for quicker extraction of active constituents.

 

2.     1:8 Ratio:

Suitable for herbs of medium hardness, like soft barks and tubers, this ratio involves boiling one part of herb with eight parts of water and reducing the mixture to one-fourth of its original volume. This method strikes a balance between extraction efficiency and the preservation of heat-sensitive compounds.

 

3.     1:16 Ratio:

For very hard or fibrous herbs, such as hard barks and root barks, a 1:16 ratio is utilized. The herb is boiled with sixteen parts of water and reduced to one-fourth of the original volume. This extended boiling ensures thorough extraction of active principles from tough plant materials.

 

4.4 HIMA28:(cold infusion):

Hima is a classical Ayurvedic method of preparing herbal infusion without the application of heat. In this method, powdered herbs are soaked in cold water (1:6), usually for 8–12 hours, and then filtered. This technique is particularly preferred for herbs that contain volatile, heat-labile, or delicate phytochemicals which may degrade upon boiling, such as aromatic compounds or essential oils.

 

4.5 Phanta29: (Hot Infusion):

Phanta involves pouring freshly boiled hot water over coarsely powdered herbs (1:4), covering the mixture and allowing it to steep (usually 10–15 minutes) before filtering. This method is similar to making herbal tea and is particularly effective for extracting aromatic, mildly active, or moderately heat-stable compounds, especially from soft plant parts like leaves or flowers.

 

4.6 Arka Kalpana30:

Arka Kalpana is a classical Ayurvedic pharmaceutical technique involving the distillation of herbal materials to obtain a clear, potent liquid known as Arka. Unlike other aqueous preparations such as Swarasa or Kwatha, Arka is distinguished by its long shelf life, rapid absorption, and high therapeutic value. The process begins by soaking the herbal raw material in water typically 6 to 10 times the weight of the drug depending on its hardness and moisture content. After soaking overnight, the material is transferred into a specially constructed distillation apparatus known as Arka Yantra, often made from traditional materials like Jirnasthimrttika (clay mixed with aged bone powder). Heat is then applied (classified into six types from Dhumagni to Bhattagni) to produce steam containing the volatile and water-soluble constituents of the drug. This steam is condensed and collected in a receiver as the final Arka. Depending on the nature of the drug, about 60–70% of the added water is recovered as Arka. The resulting liquid is colorless or pale, aromatic, and highly potent. Arka Kalpana is considered superior in many Ayurvedic texts like Arka Prakasha and is favoured for its palatability, dosage convenience and broad-spectrum therapeutic effects.

 

These methodologies underscore the ingenuity of ancient Ayurvedic practitioners in ensuring the availability of potent herbal extracts, regardless of the form in which the plant material is obtained. By adapting preparation techniques to the nature of the herb be it fresh or dried Ayurveda maintains the therapeutic integrity of its remedies.


 

Table 1. Comparative Overview of Extraction Techniques

Extraction Method

Description/Used In

Advantages

Limitations

Time Required

Comparison Highlights

Maceration

Soaking plant material in solvent; used for delicate herbs

Simple, low cost, gentle on heat-sensitive compounds

Long extraction time, less efficient

Hours to days

Best for heat-sensitive compounds but slow

Infusion

Steeping herbs in hot water; for teas and aromatics

Quick, simple, preserves volatile oils

Limited to water-soluble compounds

Minutes to 1 hour

Fast but limited solvent scope

Percolation

Continuous solvent flow through material

More exhaustive extraction than maceration

Requires more solvent, manual process

Hours to a day

More efficient than maceration

Decoction

Boiling tough plant parts like roots and bark

Extracts hard, fibrous material effectively

Can degrade heat-sensitive compounds

30 minutes to 2 hours

Best for tough materials but may lose volatiles

Soxhlet Extraction

Continuous reflux with organic solvents

Automated, exhaustive extraction

Requires heat, organic solvents, longer time

Several hours

Efficient but solvent and heat intensive

SFE

Uses CO₂ at supercritical conditions for non-polar compounds

High selectivity, green solvent, no solvent residue

Expensive equipment, requires technical skill

Minutes to hours

Cleaner, faster, highly selective vs conventional

UAE

Uses ultrasound waves to break cells and enhance extraction

Faster extraction, less solvent use

Ultrasound may degrade some sensitive compounds

Minutes to 1 hour

Rapid and efficient, moderate cost

 MAE

Microwave energy heats solvent and sample

Very rapid, improved yield, energy efficient

Not suitable for all solvents/materials, equipment cost

Minutes

Faster than conventional methods, good yields

ASE

Uses high temperature and pressure with solvents

Automated, fast, efficient

High cost, specialized equipment

Minutes

Combines speed and automation

EAE

Uses enzymes to break cell walls

Mild conditions, improved yield

Enzymes can be costly, longer incubation

Hours to days

Gentle method, useful for sensitive compounds

MHG

Solvent-free extraction using microwaves and gravity.

Green method, preserves heat-sensitive compounds.

Requires specialized equipment; less effective for dried materials.

30–60 minutes.

Faster and more environmentally friendly than traditional methods.

PEF

Applies high-voltage pulses to disrupt cell membranes.

Preserves heat-sensitive compounds, reduces energy consumption.

Requires high-voltage equipment; may not suit all materials.

Minutes.

Efficient and gentle compared to conventional methods.

SWE

Uses subcritical water to extract compounds without organic solvents.

Environmentally friendly, high selectivity.

Requires high-pressure equipment; potential thermal degradation.

Minutes to hour.

Cleaner and more selective than traditional methods.

NADES

Use natural solvent mixtures to enhance extraction

Biodegradable, tunable solvents

New technology, scalability challenges

Variable

Sustainable but emerging method

PHWE

Water under pressure at high temp extracts polar compounds

Environmentally friendly, no organic solvents

High temperature may degrade some compounds

Minutes to hours

Green and efficient alternative to solvents

Flash Extraction

Rapid pressure change disrupts plant cells

Ultra-fast, high yield

Specialized equipment needed

Seconds to minutes

Fastest extraction method available

OHAE

Electric current heats sample uniformly

Energy efficient, uniform heating

Equipment cost, limited industrial use

Minutes

Efficient heating method

EUSE

Combines enzymes and ultrasound

Maximizes yield and speed

Complex process, cost-intensive

Hours

Synergistic benefits for tough materials

ILBE

Uses ionic liquids as solvents

High solubility for many compounds

Toxicity concerns, expensive, recycling issues

Variable

Powerful but environmental concerns

Swarasa (Expressed Juice)

Fresh juice extracted from plant material; used for immediate therapeutic effect

Most potent form, quick absorption

Limited shelf life, requires fresh material

Variable

Highest potency, requires fresh material

Kalka (Paste)

Ground plant material mixed with liquid; used for external applications

Versatile, can be applied topically

Limited shelf life, may require preservatives

Seconds to minutes

Suitable for topical applications

Decoction (Kwatha)

Boiling plant material in water; used for tough or woody parts

Effective for extracting alkaloids, bitters, and polysaccharides

High temperature may degrade heat-sensitive constituents

1–2 hours

Suitable for tough plant materials

Cold Infusion (Hima)

Soaking plant material in cold water; preserves volatile compounds

Gentle extraction, preserves heat-sensitive compounds

Longer extraction time

Overnight

Preserves volatile compounds

Hot Infusion (Phanta)

Steeping plant material in hot water; extracts volatile compounds

Quick extraction, easy to prepare

Limited to water-soluble compounds

15–30 minutes

Quick and easy, suitable for volatile compound

Arka Kalpana

Traditional distillation of herbal extracts

Preserves potency and therapeutic value

Time-consuming, labor intensive, lower yield

Several hours to days

Time-honored method with therapeutic focus

 


DISCUSSION:

The comparison between traditional Ayurvedic extraction techniques and modern pharmaceutical methods reveals a profound convergence of purpose with divergence in methodology. Ayurveda’s Panchavidha Kashaya Kalpana is based on the rational application of Yukti (Logical Reasoning) emphasizing individualized, context-based processing. These methods aim to capture the therapeutic essence of plants while preserving their holistic synergy and subtle bioenergetics.

 

For instance, Swarasa (fresh juice) and Putapaka Swarasa are potent extracts. Kalka retains the full phytomatrix, Kwatha (decoction) mirrors modern decoction and hot water extraction, focusing on water-soluble principles by boiling based on plant hardness. Hima and Phanta are temperature-sensitive preparations that resemble infusion and cold maceration techniques particularly suitable for delicate phytoconstituents like volatile oils and glycosides.

 

Arka Kalpana, or Ayurvedic distillation, is closely related to hydro-distillation and steam distillation in modern practice. It is used for extracting aromatic and volatile components, providing fast-acting, palatable formulations that offer both topical and systemic effects.

In comparison, modern extraction methods have evolved to include both conventional and non-conventional techniques, further expanding into emerging green technologies:

 

Conventional extraction techniques such as maceration, infusion, percolation, decoction, Soxhlet extraction, hydro-distillation, and steam distillation have long been employed for the recovery of bioactive compounds from medicinal plants. Maceration and infusion involve soaking plant material in solvents like water or alcohol to extract phytochemicals and are conceptually aligned with Ayurvedic preparations like and Phanta, which are particularly suited for delicate, temperature-sensitive herbs. Percolation, a dynamic form of maceration with a continuous solvent flow, offers improved extraction efficiency. Decoction, involving the boiling of hard or woody plant parts, parallels the Ayurvedic Kwatha preparation, widely used for its ability to extract water-soluble active principles. Soxhlet extraction employs repeated solvent evaporation-condensation cycles to maximize the yield of especially non-polar compounds. Hydro-distillation and steam distillation techniques, used to isolate essential oils and volatile components, bear close resemblance to the Ayurvedic Arka Kalpana, which uses distillation to produce aromatic formulations for therapeutic use.

 

In contrast, non-conventional extraction techniques represent advanced technologies designed to enhance efficiency, selectivity and sustainability. Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), which uses supercritical CO₂ as a solvent, is ideal for extracting heat-sensitive and lipophilic compounds without leaving solvent residues. Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) uses acoustic cavitation to disrupt plant cells and enhance solvent penetration, significantly reducing extraction time. Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) facilitates rapid heating of plant matrices, accelerating the diffusion of bioactives. Accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) employs high temperature and pressure to improve extraction kinetics. Enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE) utilizes enzymes like cellulase and pectinase to degrade cell walls and release intracellular constituents, while microwave hydro-diffusion and gravity (MHG) offers an eco-friendly option by combining microwave heating with gravity-driven separation. Pulsed electric field (PEF) extraction applies brief high-voltage pulses to increase membrane permeability and subcritical water extraction (SWE) uses water at elevated temperatures and pressures to dissolve thermolabile and polar compounds effectively.

 

Emerging green extraction technologies further the aim of eco-conscious and efficient phytochemical recovery. Natural deep eutectic solvent (NADES) based extraction employs biodegradable, plant-mimicking solvents for enhanced solubility and safety. Pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE) leverages high-temperature, high-pressure water as a green solvent. Flash extraction uses rapid pressure shifts for efficient compound recovery, while ohmic heating-assisted extraction (OHAE) ensures uniform heating via electric currents, protecting sensitive compounds from degradation. Enzyme ultrasound synergistic extraction (EUSE) combines the benefits of EAE and UAE for maximal yield and efficacy. Ionic liquid-based extraction (ILBE) uses designer solvents to selectively extract target molecules with the added benefit of recyclability.

 

From an integrative perspective, traditional extraction methods used in Ayurveda, despite being time-intensive and lacking standardization, offer formulations that maintain the holistic integrity of plant compounds and reflect a more individualized therapeutic approach. These classical techniques emphasize natural synergy among phytoconstituents, aiming for comprehensive therapeutic effects rather than isolating single active compounds. In contrast, conventional modern methods prioritize efficiency, consistency and scalability, which are well-suited for large-scale pharmaceutical production but may compromise the quality of sensitive or complex compounds due to heat exposure or the use of harsh solvents. Emerging and non-conventional extraction technologies demonstrate promising alignment with modern demands for safety, environmental sustainability and preservation of phytochemical integrity. Techniques like enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE) and enzyme–ultrasound synergistic extraction (EUSE) further enhance the extraction efficiency and bioavailability of active compounds without significant degradation. Therefore, combining the holistic principles of traditional methods with the precision and innovation of modern technologies presents a promising approach for the development of safe, effective and sustainable plant-based therapeutics with global applicability.

 

CONCLUSION:

The evolution of extraction techniques from traditional Ayurvedic methods to modern scientific approaches reflects a continuous quest for optimizing the therapeutic potential of natural products. While traditional methods like Panchavidha Kashaya Kalpana and Arka Kalpana provide a foundational understanding and holistic benefits, integrating modern techniques such as MAE, SFE, and EAE can enhance efficiency, consistency, and scalability. A synergistic approach that combines the wisdom of traditional practices with the precision of modern technology holds promise for advancing phytopharmaceuticals and delivering effective, safe, and accessible healthcare solutions.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      Soria-Lopez A, Muñoz-Seijas N, Perez-Gregorio R, Simal-Gandara J, Otero P. Chapter 16: Extraction and production of drugs from plant. In: Arora C, Verma D, Aslam J, Mahish P, editors. Phytochemicals in Medicinal Plants: Biodiversity, Bioactivity and Drug Discovery. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter; 2023. p. 347–368. doi:10.1515/9783110791891-016.

2.      Putnik P, Barba FJ, Lucini L, Rocchetti G, Montesano D. Conventional, non-conventional extraction techniques and new strategies for the recovery of bioactive compounds from plant material for human nutrition. Food Res Int. 2019; 120: 126–138. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.05.010.

3.      Baser KHC, Buchbauer G, editors. Handbook of Essential Oils: Science, Technology, and Applications. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015.

4.      Sharangadhara A. Sharangadhara Samhita. Parashuram Shastri VPP, editor. Adhamalla B, Kashiram Vaidya P, commentators. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakashan; 2021. Madhyama Khanda, Swarasa Adhyaya, Sloka No. 1.

5.      Pandey G. Arka Prakasha of Ravana. Prathama Satakam. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Series Office; 2018.

6.      Singh J. Maceration, Percolation and Infusion Techniques. In: Handa SS, Khanuja SPS, Longo G, Rakesh DD, editors. Extraction Technologies for Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. Trieste: ICS-UNIDO; 2008. p. 67.

7.      Singh J. Maceration, Percolation and Infusion Techniques. In: Handa SS, et al. Extraction Technologies for Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. ICS-UNIDO; 2008. p. 69.

8.      Singh J. Maceration, Percolation and Infusion Techniques. In: Handa SS, et al. Extraction Technologies. ICS-UNIDO; 2008. p. 70–72.

9.      Tandon S, Rane S. Decoction and Hot Continuous Extraction. In: Handa SS, et al. Extraction Technologies. ICS-UNIDO; 2008. p. 87–92.

10.   Ghenabzia, I., Hemmami, H., Ben Amor, I., Zeghoud, S., Ben Seghir, B., and Hammoudi, R. Different methods of extraction of bioactive compounds and their effect on biological activity: A review. International Journal of Secondary Metabolite. 2023; 10(4): 469–494. https://doi.org/10.21448/ijsm.1225936

11.   Arumugham, T., Krishnamoorthy, R., Hasan, S. W., Show, P. L., Rinklebe, J., and Banat, F. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of plant phytochemicals for biological and environmental applications – A review. Chemosphere. 2021; 271: 129525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129525PubMed+7.

12.   Chemat F, Rombaut N, Sicaire AG, Meullemiestre A, Fabiano-Tixier AS, Abert-Vian M. Ultrasound assisted extraction of food and natural products. Mechanisms, techniques, combinations, protocols and applications – A review. Ultrason Sonochem. 2017; 34: 540–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.06.035

13.   López-Salazar, H., Camacho-Díaz, B. H., Ocampo, M. L. A., and Jiménez-Aparicio, A. R. Microwave-assisted extraction of functional compounds from plants: A review. BioResources. 2023; 18(3): 6614–6638. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.18.3.Lopez-Salazar

14.   Giergielewicz-Możajska, H., Dąbrowski, Ł., and Namieśnik, J. Accelerated Solvent Extraction (ASE) in the analysis of environmental solid samples — Some aspects of theory and practice. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry. 2001; 31(3): 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/20014091076712

15.   Łubek-Nguyen, A., Ziemichód, W., and Olech, M. Application of enzyme-assisted extraction for the recovery of natural bioactive compounds for nutraceutical and pharmaceutical applications. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(7): 3232. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073232

16.   Lucchesi ME, Chemat F, Smadja J. Solvent-free microwave extraction of essential oil from aromatic herbs: comparison with conventional hydrodistillation. J Chromatogr A. 2004 Jul 23; 1043(2): 323–7.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2004.05.083

17.   Belwal T, Ezzat SM, Rastrelli L, Bhatt ID, Daglia M, Devkota HP, et al. A critical review on pulsed electric field: A novel technology for the extraction of phytoconstituents. Molecules. 2021 Aug 13; 26(16):  4893.doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26164893

18.   Toor SS, Rosendahl L, Rudolf A. Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass: a review of subcritical water technologies. Energy. 2011 May; 36(5): 2328–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.013

19.   Huang, M. M., Yiin, C. L., Lock, S. S. M., Chin, B. L. F., Othman, I., Zauzi, N. S. A., and Chan, Y. H. Natural deep eutectic solvents (NADES) for sustainable extraction of bioactive compounds from medicinal plants: Recent advances, challenges, and future directions. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2025; 425: 127202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2025.127202

20.   Plaza M, Turner C. Pressurized hot water extraction of bioactives. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2015; 71: 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2015.02.022

21.   Gómez-Ríos, G. A., Pérez-Juan, P., and Pérez-Bendito, D. Flash extraction: A green and efficient technique for the extraction of bioactive compounds from plants. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2018; 105: 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.05.001

22.   Zhao, Y., and Wang, L. Osmotic-homogenate assisted extraction (OHAE): A novel green technique for the extraction of bioactive compounds from plant materials. Separation and Purification Technology. 2020; 242: 116779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116779

23.   Li, X., and Zhang, M. Enzyme-enhanced supercritical extraction (EUSE) of bioactive compounds from plant materials: A review. Food Research International. 2021; 140: 109876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109876

24.   Zhao, H., and Li, Z. Ionic liquid-based extraction (ILBE) of bioactive compounds from natural products: Recent developments and applications. Green Chemistry. 2019; 21(16): 4385–4402. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9GC01513A

25.   Sharangadhara A. Sharangadhara Samhita. Parashuram Shastri VPP, editor. Adhamalla B, Kashiram Vaidya P, commentators. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakashan; 2021. Madhyama Khanda, Swarasa Adhyaya Sloka No.1-5.

26.   Sharangadhara A. Sharangadhara Samhita. Parashuram Shastri VPP, editor. Adhamalla B, Kashiram Vaidya P, commentators. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakashan; 2021. Madhyama Khanda, kalka Kalpana Adhyaya Sloka No.1.

27.   Sharangadhara A. Sharangadhara Samhita. Parashuram Shastri VPP, editor. Adhamalla B, Kashiram Vaidya P, commentators. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakashan; 2021. Madhyama Khanda, Kwata Kalpana Adhyaya Sloka No.1-7.

28.   Sharangadhara A. Sharangadhara Samhita. Parashuram Shastri VPP, editor. Adhamalla B, Kashiram Vaidya P, commentators. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakashan; 2021. Madhyama Khanda, Hima Kalpana Adhyaya Sloka No.1

29.   Sharangadhara A. Sharangadhara Samhita. Parashuram Shastri VPP, editor. Adhamalla B, Kashiram Vaidya P, commentators. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakashan; 2021. Madhyama Khanda, Phanta Kalpana Adhyaya Sloka No.1

30.   Pandey G. Arka Prakasha of Ravana. Prathama Satakam. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Series Office; 2018.

 

 

 

Received on 06.06.2025      Revised on 01.07.2025

Accepted on 21.07.2025      Published on 12.08.2025

Available online from August 18, 2025

Asian J. Research Chem.2025; 18(4):291-300.

DOI: 10.52711/0974-4150.2025.00045

©A and V Publications All Right Reserved

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License.