INTRODUCTION:

Ultraviolet–Visible (UV–Vis) spectroscopy is one of the most widely employed analytical techniques for both qualitative and quantitative analysis of chemical substances. It is based on the absorption of electromagnetic radiation in the ultraviolet (200–400 nm) and visible (400–800 nm) regions by molecules, resulting in electronic transitions from lower to higher energy states.

These transitions typically involve σ, π, and non-bonding (n) electrons, leading to characteristic absorption spectra that are highly dependent on molecular structure and chemical environment.¹

The technique operates on the fundamental principle that the amount of light absorbed by a substance is directly proportional to its concentration and path length, as described by the Beer–Lambert law. Because of this linear relationship, UV–Vis spectroscopy is extensively used for quantitative determination of drugs, biomolecules, metal ions, and environmental pollutants. The method is favored due to its simplicity, rapid analysis, cost-effectiveness, and minimal sample preparation requirements. ²

Modern UV–Vis spectroscopy has evolved beyond simple absorbance measurements to include a variety of analytical techniques such as simultaneous equation methods, derivative spectroscopy, absorbance ratio methods, and multicomponent analysis. These techniques enhance selectivity, sensitivity, and accuracy, especially in complex mixtures with overlapping spectra. Consequently, UV–Vis spectroscopic techniques play a crucial role in pharmaceutical analysis, quality control, biochemical studies, and material characterization, maintaining their relevance in both research and industrial applications. Many methods were developed for UV spectroscopy by the help of this different UV techniques for different drugs whether it is individual or simultaneously with other drugs.^23-33

Principle of UV Spectroscopy:

Ultraviolet (UV) spectroscopy is based on the interaction of ultraviolet and visible electromagnetic radiation with matter, resulting in the absorption of specific wavelengths by chemical substances. When UV or visible radiation passes through a sample, absorption occurs if the energy of the incident radiation matches the energy difference between the ground and excited electronic states of the molecules present. This absorption produces a characteristic spectrum that can be used for both qualitative identification and quantitative estimation of analytes. The technique is widely applied due to its simplicity, sensitivity, and cost-effectiveness.^3,4

The absorption process involves excitation of electrons from lower-energy molecular orbitals to higher-energy orbitals. The molecular orbitals commonly involved in UV spectroscopy include bonding σ and π orbitals, non-bonding (n) orbitals, and their corresponding antibonding orbitals σ* and π*. The nature of these electronic transitions determines the position and intensity of absorption bands in the UV–Visible region, typically spanning 200–800 nm. ^3,4

Beer–Lambert Law:

The quantitative foundation of UV spectroscopy is governed by the Beer–Lambert law, which establishes a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration of the absorbing species. According to this law:

𝐴= −log(𝐼/𝐼₀) =𝜀𝑏𝑐

When Beer–Lambert law is obeyed, a plot of absorbance versus concentration yields a straight line passing through the origin, enabling accurate quantitative determination of substances in pharmaceutical, biological, and chemical analyses.^3,4

Electronic Transitions in UV Spectroscopy:

Absorption of UV or visible radiation induces electronic transitions within molecules. The principal electronic transitions observed are:

σ → σ* transitions:

These transitions involve excitation from bonding σ orbitals to antibonding σ* orbitals. They require high energy and generally occur in the far-UV region below 200 nm, limiting their analytical usefulness.

n → σ* transitions:

These occur in saturated compounds containing heteroatoms with lone-pair electrons. They require less energy than σ → σ* transitions and typically appear in the 150–250 nm range.

π → π* transitions:

These transitions are characteristic of unsaturated and aromatic compounds and show high molar absorptivity. They usually occur in the 200–400 nm region and are highly significant in analytical UV spectroscopy.

n → π* transitions:

These involve excitation of non-bonding electrons to π* antibonding orbitals and are commonly observed in compounds containing functional groups such as carbonyls and nitro groups. ^3,4

Among these, π → π* and n → π* transitions are most important analytically, as they occur within the accessible UV–Visible range and provide valuable information about molecular structure and concentration.

Fig 1: Graphical Representation of Electronic Transition.²

Instrumentation:

Ultraviolet–Visible (UV–Vis) spectroscopy is a fundamental analytical technique widely applied in pharmaceutical, chemical, and biological sciences for qualitative and quantitative analysis. The reliability, sensitivity, and accuracy of UV–Vis measurements depend largely on the design and performance of the spectrophotometer.

Fig 2: Instrumentation of Double Beam UV Spectrophotometer ⁷

A typical UV–Vis spectrophotometer consists of a radiation source, monochromator, sample compartment, detector, signal processing system, and readout unit, arranged in a defined optical path to measure absorbance or transmittance in the wavelength range of approximately 190–800 nm.^5-8

1. Radiation Sources:

The radiation source provides continuous electromagnetic radiation covering the ultraviolet and visible regions. An ideal source should exhibit high intensity, stability, low noise, and long operational life.

Deuterium (D₂) lamps are commonly employed for ultraviolet measurements and operate effectively in the range of 160–400 nm. These lamps produce UV radiation through electrical discharge in deuterium gas and are widely used due to their strong UV output. However, their intensity decreases with usage, necessitating periodic replacement.^6,7

Tungsten or tungsten–halogen lamps are used for visible region analysis, emitting radiation typically between 350–900 nm. These lamps function by heating a tungsten filament enclosed in a glass envelope and are characterized by good stability and long service life, making them suitable for routine visible spectroscopy.^6,7

Modern UV–Vis instruments increasingly utilize xenon flash lamps, which emit high-intensity radiation over a broad wavelength range (185–2500 nm). These lamps offer several advantages, including minimal warm-up time, reduced photodegradation of samples, and extended lamp life, thereby improving instrument efficiency and performance.^5,8

2. Monochromator (Wavelength Selector):

The monochromator is responsible for isolating a narrow band of wavelengths from the polychromatic radiation emitted by the source. It plays a critical role in achieving spectral resolution and accuracy.

A typical monochromator comprises an entrance slit, collimating lens, dispersing element (prism or diffraction grating), focusing lens, and exit slit. Polychromatic radiation enters through the entrance slit, is collimated, and then dispersed into its component wavelengths. By rotating the dispersing element or adjusting the exit slit, radiation of a specific wavelength is selected and directed toward the sample. ^6–8

Fig 3: Representation of Prism Monochromator⁶

Most modern UV–Vis spectrophotometers employ holographic diffraction gratings due to their linear dispersion, temperature stability, and high wavelength accuracy. High-performance instruments often incorporate double monochromator systems, which significantly reduce stray light and enhance spectral purity compared to single monochromator designs. ⁵

3. Sample Compartment and Sample Holders:

The sample compartment is a light-tight enclosure designed to minimize stray radiation and environmental interference. Samples are typically placed in cuvettes with a fixed optical path length, most commonly 10 mm.

Quartz or fused silica cuvettes are essential for UV region measurements as they transmit radiation down to approximately 190 nm. Glass and plastic cuvettes are suitable only for visible region analysis because they absorb ultraviolet radiation below 350 nm. ^6-8

Specialized sample holders such as flow-through cells, micro-volume cells, solid sample holders, and fiber-optic probes are used for kinetic studies, low-volume samples, and in situ measurements.⁵

4. Optical Configuration:

UV–Vis spectrophotometers may operate in single-beam or double-beam configurations.

In single-beam instruments, radiation passes through the sample and directly reaches the detector. Baseline correction must be performed separately using a blank, making the system more susceptible to fluctuations in source intensity.^6,7

In double-beam instruments, the radiation is split into a sample beam and a reference beam, allowing simultaneous measurement of the sample and blank. This configuration compensates for fluctuations in source intensity and improves measurement accuracy and precision, making it the preferred design in modern analytical laboratories.^5,7,8

5. Detectors:

The detector converts transmitted or absorbed radiation into an electrical signal proportional to light intensity. An ideal detector should exhibit high sensitivity, low noise, and linear response over a wide wavelength range.

Photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) are widely used detectors in UV–Vis spectroscopy and operate effectively between 200–900 nm. PMTs provide excellent sensitivity by amplifying the signal through multiple dynodes, making them suitable for detecting low light intensities.^6-8

Silicon photodiode detectors and photodiode array (PDA) detectors are increasingly used due to their robustness, wide dynamic range, and ability to record entire spectra simultaneously. PDA detectors are especially advantageous for rapid scanning, kinetic studies, and use as detectors in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) systems.^5,8

6. Signal Processing and Readout System:

The electrical signal generated by the detector is amplified, processed, and converted into digital form. Modern UV–Vis spectrophotometers are interfaced with computer-based systems that allow data acquisition, spectral display, baseline correction, quantitative analysis, and storage of results. Absorbance is commonly calculated using the Beer–Lambert law, enabling accurate determination of analyte concentration. ^6-8

Different UV Spectroscopic Techniques Used in Multicomponent Analysis:

Ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) spectrophotometry is one of the most extensively used analytical techniques in pharmaceutical analysis due to its simplicity, rapidity, cost-effectiveness, and adequate sensitivity for routine quality-control applications. The increasing availability of fixed-dose combination products and multicomponent pharmaceutical formulations has created a strong demand for analytical methods capable of estimating two or more active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) simultaneously without prior separation. Classical single-wavelength UV spectrophotometric analysis often fails in such cases because of overlapping absorption spectra among components. To overcome these limitations, several UV spectroscopic techniques based on mathematical manipulation of spectral data have been developed, including simultaneous equation method, Q-absorbance ratio method, absorption correction method, iso-absorptive point method, and derivative spectrophotometry.^9-12

These techniques are based on the Beer–Lambert law and the principle of additivity of absorbance, which states that the total absorbance of a mixture at a given wavelength is equal to the sum of the absorbances of the individual components, provided that no chemical interaction occurs between them.^9,13 Proper selection of analytical wavelengths and mathematical treatment of spectral overlap enable selective and accurate quantification of components in complex pharmaceutical mixtures.

1. Simultaneous Equation Method (Vierordt’s Method):

The simultaneous equation method, also known as Vierordt’s method, is one of the earliest UV spectrophotometric techniques developed for the simultaneous estimation of two components in a binary mixture.

Fig 4: UV Spectra for Simultaneous Equation Method.¹¹

This method is applicable when both components absorb at each other’s wavelength maxima (λ₁ and λ₂). The total absorbance of the mixture at each wavelength is considered to be the algebraic sum of the individual absorbances of the components.^9,14

For a mixture containing two components X and Y, the absorbance equations at wavelengths λ₁ and λ₂ can be written as:

A₁ = aₓ₁ Cₓ + aᵧ₁ Cᵧ

A₂ = aₓ₂ Cₓ + aᵧ₂ Cᵧ

where A₁ and A₂ are the absorbances of the mixture at λ₁ and λ₂, aₓ₁ and aₓ₂ are the absorptivities of component X, aᵧ₁ and aᵧ₂ are the absorptivities of component Y, and Cₓ and Cᵧ are their respective concentrations. Solving these equations simultaneously yields the concentration of each component.

The main advantage of this method is its simplicity and ease of application, making it suitable for routine pharmaceutical analysis. However, it requires strict compliance with Beer’s law and sufficiently different absorptivity values at the selected wavelengths. Significant spectral overlap or similar absorptivity ratios may reduce the accuracy of the method. ^9,15

2. Q-Absorbance Ratio Method (Absorbance Ratio Method):

The Q-absorbance ratio method is a modified version of the simultaneous equation method and is particularly useful when the absorption spectra of two components intersect at a common wavelength known as the iso-absorptive point. At this wavelength, both components exhibit identical absorptivity values, allowing simplification of the mathematical treatment. This method relies on the ratio of absorbances measured at two wavelengths: one being the iso-absorptive point (λᵢₛₒ) and the other being the λmax of one of the components. ^11,14

The absorbance equations for a binary mixture at λ₁ (iso-absorptive point) and λ₂ (λmax of one component) are expressed as:

A₁ = a (Cₓ + Cᵧ)

A₂ = aₓ₂ Cₓ + aᵧ₂ Cᵧ

The ratio of absorbances (Q value) is defined as:

Qₘ = A₂ / A₁

Similarly, absorptivity ratios for the pure components are defined as:

Qₓ = aₓ₂ / a

Qᵧ = aᵧ₂ / a

Fig 5: Spectrum indicating selecting Q Ratio Method¹¹

Using these ratios, the concentration of each component can be calculated by solving the derived equations. Because the method utilizes absorbance ratios rather than absolute absorbance values, it is relatively insensitive to minor variations in path length and concentration, provided Beer’s law is obeyed.

The Q-absorbance ratio method is widely used in pharmaceutical analysis due to its improved selectivity and simplicity compared to the simultaneous equation method. However, its application is restricted to systems exhibiting a well-defined iso-absorptive point, and accurate wavelength selection remains critical for reliable results.^11,16

3. Absorption Correction Method:

The absorption correction method is employed when one component of a binary mixture absorbs at two selected wavelengths while the second component absorbs significantly at only one of those wavelengths. This method is particularly useful for mixtures where one analyte exhibits negligible absorbance at a selected wavelength, allowing its contribution to be mathematically corrected from the total absorbance. ^14,16

In this method, the absorbance of the mixture is measured at two wavelengths: λ₁, where both components absorb, and λ₂, where only one component (X) shows appreciable absorbance. The absorbance contribution of component X at λ₁ is calculated using its absorptivity ratio between λ₁ and λ₂, and this value is subtracted from the total absorbance at λ₁ to obtain the absorbance due to component Y alone. The concentration of each component can then be calculated using Beer–Lambert’s law.

The absorption correction method offers improved selectivity compared to the simultaneous equation method and is particularly advantageous when spectral overlap is asymmetric. However, its accuracy depends on precise absorptivity measurements and the assumption that one component shows negligible absorbance at the selected correction wavelength. ¹⁴

4. Iso-absorptive Point Method:

The iso-absorptive point method is based on the presence of a wavelength at which two or more components in a mixture have identical absorptivity values. At this wavelength, the total absorbance of the mixture is directly proportional to the sum of the concentrations of all absorbing species. This property is exploited to determine the total concentration of components, while individual concentrations are obtained using absorbance measurements at additional wavelengths. ^11,17

At the iso-absorptive wavelength λᵢₛₒ, the absorbance is given by:

Aᵢₛₒ = a (Cₓ + Cᵧ)

By combining this equation with absorbance measurements at another wavelength where the components exhibit different absorptivities, individual concentrations can be calculated. The method is particularly useful in combination with the Q-absorbance ratio technique and provides high accuracy when a well-defined iso-absorptive point exists.

The main limitation of the iso-absorptive point method is its dependence on the presence of a distinct iso-absorptive wavelength, which may not always be observed for all binary or multicomponent systems.^11,17

5. Derivative Spectrophotometric Method:

Derivative spectrophotometry involves mathematical transformation of zero-order absorption spectra into first, second, or higher-order derivative spectra by differentiating absorbance with respect to wavelength. This technique enhances spectral resolution, reduces baseline drift, and improves selectivity by resolving overlapping spectral bands that cannot be distinguished in conventional absorption spectra.^10,12,15

The first-order derivative spectrum represents the rate of change of absorbance with wavelength, while higher-order derivatives provide further resolution of overlapping peaks. Quantitative analysis is typically performed using the zero-crossing technique, in which the derivative signal of one component is measured at a wavelength where the derivative signal of the interfering component crosses zero. Under these conditions, the measured derivative amplitude is proportional only to the concentration of the analyte of interest.

Derivative spectrophotometry retains the fundamental principles of Beer–Lambert’s law and additivity, allowing accurate quantification of components in binary and multicomponent mixtures. The technique has been extensively applied for the analysis of pharmaceutical combinations, particularly where severe spectral overlap exists. However, higher-order derivatives may amplify instrumental noise, necessitating careful optimization of smoothing parameters and instrumental settings.^10,15

Comparative Evaluation and Pharmaceutical Relevance:

Among the various UV spectroscopic techniques discussed, the choice of method depends largely on the degree of spectral overlap, availability of an iso-absorptive point, required sensitivity, and simplicity of data processing. Simultaneous equation and absorption correction methods are suitable for systems with moderate overlap, whereas Q-ratio and iso-absorptive point methods offer improved accuracy when spectral conditions permit. Derivative spectrophotometry provides the highest selectivity for severely overlapping spectra and is particularly valuable for complex pharmaceutical formulations.

Collectively, these methods enable rapid, cost-effective, and reliable analysis of multicomponent pharmaceutical products without the need for prior separation, making them indispensable tools in routine quality-control and formulation development laboratories. ^9,11,18

Limitations of UV Spectroscopy:

Despite its extensive applications, UV spectroscopy has several inherent limitations that restrict its universal applicability. One of the primary limitations is low selectivity, as many compounds absorb in the same UV region, leading to overlapping spectra. This makes it difficult to analyze complex mixtures without prior separation or advanced mathematical treatments such as derivative or multicomponent analysis.^21,23

Another major limitation is dependence on Beer–Lambert’s law, which is valid only within a limited concentration range. At high concentrations, deviations occur due to molecular interactions, refractive index changes, and chemical equilibria, resulting in non-linear absorbance–concentration relationships.^20,23 Similarly, very low absorbance values may suffer from poor signal-to-noise ratios, reducing analytical accuracy.

UV spectroscopy is also highly sensitive to solvent effects. Solvent polarity can influence electronic transitions, causing bathochromic or hypsochromic shifts and changes in absorbance intensity. Improper solvent selection may lead to peak broadening and reduced spectral resolution.²¹Therefore, solvents must be transparent in the UV region and chemically inert toward the analyte.

Another limitation is that UV spectroscopy provides limited structural information. While it can indicate the presence of chromophores and degree of conjugation, it cannot provide complete structural elucidation. Hence, UV spectroscopy is often used as a complementary technique alongside IR, NMR, or mass spectrometry.²³

Instrumental factors such as stray light, wavelength inaccuracy, and detector noise can also affect measurement accuracy. Stray light becomes particularly problematic at high absorbance values, leading to underestimation of absorbance and deviation from linearity.²⁰ Regular instrument calibration and performance verification are therefore essential.

In derivative UV spectroscopy, although spectral resolution is enhanced, noise amplification becomes a significant drawback, especially at higher derivative orders. This limits reproducibility and requires careful optimization of smoothing parameters and instrumental settings.²³

Additionally, UV spectroscopy is not suitable for compounds lacking chromophores, as saturated molecules and inorganic salts often show little or no absorption above 200 nm. Such compounds require derivatization or alternative analytical techniques for detection.²¹

Applications of UV Spectroscopy:

Ultraviolet (UV) spectroscopy is one of the most widely employed analytical techniques in pharmaceutical, chemical, biological, and environmental sciences due to its simplicity, rapid analysis, and cost-effectiveness. The technique is primarily based on the absorption of ultraviolet radiation by molecules undergoing electronic transitions, mainly π→π* and n→π* transitions, which provide valuable qualitative and quantitative information about analytes^19,20.

In pharmaceutical analysis, UV spectroscopy is extensively used for the quantitative estimation of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) in bulk drugs and dosage forms. The method is routinely applied for assay determination, content uniformity testing, dissolution studies, and stability testing of pharmaceutical formulations. Because absorbance follows Beer–Lambert’s law within a specific concentration range, UV spectroscopy enables accurate determination of drug concentration with minimal sample preparation ^19,21. It is particularly valuable in routine quality-control laboratories where rapid analysis of multiple samples is required.

UV spectroscopy also plays a crucial role in method development and validation. During method development, selection of appropriate wavelength, solvent, and concentration range ensures specificity and linearity. Validation parameters such as accuracy, precision, linearity, robustness, and limit of detection are commonly assessed using UV spectrophotometric methods, making it an important regulatory tool in pharmaceutical industries²².

In biochemistry and molecular biology, UV spectroscopy is widely used for the estimation of nucleic acids and proteins. Nucleic acids exhibit maximum absorbance around 260 nm, whereas proteins absorb strongly near 280 nm due to aromatic amino acids such as tryptophan and tyrosine. The absorbance ratio A260/A280 is commonly employed to assess the purity of DNA and RNA samples ^19,23. UV spectroscopy is also used to monitor enzyme kinetics and ligand–protein interactions by measuring changes in absorbance over time.

In environmental analysis, UV spectroscopy is applied for the detection and quantification of pollutants in water and air. Common applications include determination of nitrates, sulphates, organic contaminants, and industrial effluents. In air-quality monitoring, UV spectroscopy is used to detect gaseous pollutants such as ozone, nitrogen oxides, and sulphur dioxide due to their characteristic UV absorption^19,20.

The technique also finds applications in the food and beverage industry, where it is used to estimate vitamins, synthetic dyes, preservatives, and adulterants. UV spectroscopy helps ensure compliance with food-safety regulations by enabling rapid screening of contaminants and additives¹⁹.

In forensic science and clinical diagnostics, UV spectroscopy is employed for the detection of drugs, toxins, alcohols, dyes, and inks. It aids in the identification of chemical residues in forensic samples and biological matrices, contributing to toxicological and criminal investigations^19,21.

In recent years, UV spectroscopy has gained significance in nanotechnology and materials science. Metal nanoparticles such as silver and gold exhibit characteristic surface plasmon resonance bands in the UV-visible region, enabling particle size estimation and stability studies. UV spectroscopy is also used to study optical band gaps and photochemical behavior of semiconducting materials^19,20.

CONCLUSION:

Ultraviolet–Visible spectroscopy remains one of the most valuable and extensively used analytical techniques due to its operational simplicity, rapid analysis, affordability, and wide applicability across multiple scientific disciplines. The technique provides reliable qualitative and quantitative information based on electronic transitions and adherence to the Beer–Lambert law, making it particularly useful in pharmaceutical quality control and routine analysis.

The present review highlights that the scope of UV spectroscopy extends far beyond conventional single-component analysis. Advanced UV spectroscopic techniques such as simultaneous equation methods, Q-absorbance ratio methods, absorption correction, iso-absorptive point analysis, and derivative spectrophotometry have significantly enhanced selectivity and accuracy in multicomponent systems with overlapping spectra. These approaches enable simultaneous estimation of multiple analytes without prior separation, offering practical advantages in terms of time, cost, and solvent consumption.

Despite these advantages, UV spectroscopy exhibits certain limitations, including low selectivity, susceptibility to solvent and instrumental effects, deviation from linearity at extreme concentrations, and limited structural elucidation capability. Therefore, careful method development, validation, and optimization are essential for obtaining accurate and reproducible results. In complex analytical scenarios, UV spectroscopy is most effective when used in combination with complementary techniques such as chromatographic or spectroscopic methods.

In conclusion, UV–Visible spectroscopy continues to be a robust and indispensable analytical tool. With ongoing advancements in instrumentation, data processing, and mathematical treatment of spectra, its role in pharmaceutical analysis and allied fields is expected to remain significant in both academic research and industrial applications.

REFERENCES:

1. Patel D, Panchal D, Patel K, Dalwadi M, Upadhyay U. A review on UV visible spectroscopy. Int J Creat Res Thoughts. 2022; 10(10): b399-b408. DOI: 10.35629/7781-070511441151

2. More SS, Kadam SP, Redasani VK. A comprehensive review of UV–visible spectroscopy. Int J Pharm Res Appl. 2025; 10(3): 114-134. doi:10.35629/4494-1003114134.

3. Shabbir WS, Chauhan S. A review on use of ultraviolet spectroscopy. Innovare J Med Sci. 2024; 12(4): 5-11. doi:10.22159/ijms.2024v12i4.51499.

4. Alaboodi AS, Kadhim SA, Hussein AS. Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy: importance, principle, structure and most important applications a study review. Int J Novel Res Phys Chem Math. 2025; 12(1): 53-60. doi:10.5281/zenodo.14965556.

5. Agilent Technologies. The Basics of UV–Vis Spectrophotometry: A Primer. Santa Clara (CA): Agilent Technologies; 2016.

6. Shinde G, Godage RK, Jadhav RS, Barhate M, Bhagwat A. A review on advances in UV spectroscopy. Res J Sci Technol. 2020; 12(1): 47-51. doi:10.5958/2349-2988.2020.00005.4.

7. Mandru A, Mane J, Mandapati R. A review on UV-visible spectroscopy. J Pharma Insights Res. 2023; 1(2): 91-96. doi:10.5281/zenodo.10232708.

8. Microbe Notes. UV-Vis Spectroscopy: Principle, Parts, Uses, Limitations Internet. Kathmandu (NP): Microbe Notes; 28 Nov 2023 cited 2026 Jan 31.

9. Kamal AH, El-Malla SF, Hammad SF. A review on UV spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous multicomponent analysis. European Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research. 2016; 3(2): 348-360. https://api.semanticscholar.org/ CorpusID:100306509

10. Sowjanya G, Ganapaty S, Almas S. Derivative UV spectroscopic approaches in multicomponent analysis – a review. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2019; 11(2): 1-11. doi:10.22159/ijpps.2019v11i2.30510.

11. Gauswami V, Kayasth K, Gupta D, Dalwadi M, Upadhyay U. A review article on multicomponent estimation by using UV spectroscopy. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts. 2023; 11(10): 837-849.

12. Sneha TR, Rekha S, Nishad VM. A review on multicomponent analysis. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Applications. 2022; 7(2): 532-535. Doi: 10.35629/7781-0702532535

13. Cerda V, Phansi P, Ferreira S. From mono- to multicomponent methods in UV-VIS spectrophotometric and fluorimetric quantitative analysis – a review. Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2022; 157: 116772. doi:10.1016/j.trac.2022.116772.

14. Mukherjee P, Chakraborty DC, Chakraborty P, Shrestha B, Bhuyan NR. Different ultraviolet spectroscopic methods: a retrospective study on its application from the viewpoint of analytical chemistry. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 2021; 14(9): 1-11. doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2021v14i9.42172.

15. Andure SD, Tiwari N. A complete review on UV-visible spectroscopic technique. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Applications. 2022; 7(6): 1288-1299. doi:10.35629/7781-070612881299.

16. Bairagi A, Rayate AR, Kokate PJ. Analytical review on UV spectroscopy. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development. 2024; 8(6): 595-606.

17. Shinde KP, Rajmane AD. A review on UV method development and validation. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2023; 13(2): 122-130. Doi: 10.52711/2231-5675.2023.00021

18. Hattimare KB, Mehar KK, Patewar MM, Borkar CG, Nimbekar TP. A review on UV method validation and development. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts. 2025; 13(1): 470-482.

19. Nasreen A, Praveena K, Keerthana P, Sai GM, Soundarya GU. A review of ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy and its practical applications. Int J Sci Res Eng Dev. 2025; 8(4): 950-955.

20. Mettler-Toledo. UV/Vis Spectrophotometry: Fundamentals and Applications. Switzerland: Mettler-Toledo AG; 2023.

21. Paithane PR, Gore KR, Waghmare S, Kamble H. A review on UV-visible spectroscopy. Int J Innov Res Technol. 2024; 11(1): 171-176.

22. Khokrale S, Lulla J, Borse L. A review of the UV-visible spectroscopy’s method development and validation. Int J Pharm Sci. 2024; 2(6): 527-538. DOI: 10.53388/2024206527

23. Redasani VK, Patel PR, Marathe DY, Chaudhari SR, Shirkhedkar AA, Surana SJ. A review on derivative UV-spectrophotometry analysis of drugs in pharmaceutical formulations and biological samples. J Chil Chem Soc. 2018; 63(3): 4126-4133. Doi: 10.4067/S0717-97072018000304126

24. Pooja Kaushal, Shiv Kumar Kushawaha, Manish Majumder, Mahendra Singh Ashawat. Validated Analytical Method for Multicomponent Analysis of Famotidine and Ofloxacin in Bulk drug and Tablet Formulation by using UV-Visible Spectrophotometer and RP-HPLC. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2023; 13(3): 162-0. DOI:10.52711/2231-5675.2023.00026

25. Suraj R. Chaudhari, Amod S. Patil, Atul A. Shirkhedkar. Studies on Derivative Spectroscopy and Area Under Curve UV-Spectrophotometric Methods for Estimation of Apremilast in Bulk and In-house Tablets. Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2018; 8(1): 11-16. Doi: 10.5958/2231-5691.2018.00003.5

26. Ashwini Shelke, Madhavi Shinde, Rajendra Mogal, Rahul Sable, Anil Jadhav. Application of UV Spectrophotometric Methods for Simultaneous Estimation of Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate in Bulk. Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 2018; 8(2): 103-107. DOI: 10.5958/2231-5713.2018.00016.8

27. Prakash A, Lone KD, Shukla A, Mandloi R, Ghosh V. Spectrophotometric Estimation of Mesalazine in Tablet Dosage Form. Asian J. Research Chem. Oct.-Dec. 2008; 1(2): 80-82.

28. Neela M Bhatia, A Y Gavali. Development and Validation of Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Atenolol and Lercanidipine from Tablet Dosage Form by Second Order Derivative Spectroscopy. Asian J. Research Chem. Oct.-Dec. 2009 2(4): 398-400.

29. Rele Rajan V., Patil Sachin S.. Spectrophotometric Estimation of Carbocisteine in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form by First Order Derivative and Area Under Curve Methods. Asian J. Research Chem. March 2013; 6(3): 236-240.

30. Rajan V. Rele. Simultaneous Spectrophotometric Estimation of Amoxicillin and Carbocisteine by First Order Derivative Spectroscopy Method in Combined Dosage Form. Asian J. Research Chem. April 2014; 7(4): 412-416.

31. Santosh V. Gandhi, Shrushti R. Bodake, Shreya M. Ambilwade, Pallavi R. Andhale, Amit G. Jamode, Raj M. Jawalkar. Simultaneous Estimation of Tolperisone and Etoricoxib in Bulk and Tablet Dosage Form by Spectrophotometric Methods. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Technology. 2025; 17(4): 257-1. Doi: 10.52711/0975-4377.2025.00035

32. Shashikant R Pattan, Syed N Lateef, Prakash N Kendre, Nachiket S Dighe, Rahul K Godge. Simultaneous Estimation of Ofloxacin and Satranidazole in Bulk and Dosage form by Ratio Spectra Derivative Spectroscopy. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. July-Sept. 2009; 2(3): 531-533.

33. J Priyadharisini, D Saraswathi, Ajithadas Aruna, A Jerad Suresh. Hydrotropic solubilisation Technique of Metaxalone by Area under Curve and Second Order Derivative Spectroscopy. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. January 2011; 4(1): 72-74.

Received on 07.05.2026 Revised on 10.06.2026

Accepted on 14.07.2026 Published on 12.09.2026

Available online from September 19, 2026

Asian J. Research Chem.2026; 19(5):442-450.

DOI: 10.52711/0974-4150.2026.00065

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License.