Author(s):
Gemechu Bekana, Tagay Takele
Email(s):
gemechu.bekana@yahoo.com
DOI:
10.5958/0974-4150.2020.00079.6
Address:
Gemechu Bekana1, Tagay Takele2
1Assistant Professor of Statistics, Department of Statistics, College of Natural and Computational Science, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
2Lecturer of Mathematics, Department of Mathematics, College of Natural and Computational Science, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
*Corresponding Author
Published In:
Volume - 13,
Issue - 6,
Year - 2020
ABSTRACT:
This study aims to assess the impact of new agricultural technology adoption on the livelihoods of the farmers, in western wollega, Ethiopia. A random sample of 450 farmers was selected using multistage random sampling from the study area. Logistic regression models, test hypothesis: Z-test, t - test and Chi-square test methods of data analysis were used in this study. Comparisons were made between agricultural technology adopters and non-adopters using the Z- test. To assess the impact of adopting agricultural technology on the educational status of the family, the ratio of children in schools to the total number of school aged children in the family, expressed as percentage. The ability of the household to feed the family was also seen in terms of the frequency of feeding the children and the adult. The percentage of farmers having corrugated iron sheet roofed houses, the percentage of farmers having separate kitchens other than their living rooms for cooking and the percentage of farmers having separate structure for livestock other than the living room were used to assess the impact of agricultural technology adoption on the housing conditions of the farmers. It was found that technology adopters are better off than the non adopters in terms of sending children to elementary school, housing conditions and ability to finance their families’ food requirements. After all analysis, it can be concluded that adoption of agricultural technology enables the farmer to send children to school, have improved housing conditions, and food secured than the non-adopters. Finally, the results were recommended as creating the awareness about the uses of education, business awareness and advising the adopters and non-adopters of agricultural technology adoption.
Cite this article:
Gemechu Bekana, Tagay Takele. Impacts of New Agricultural Technology Adoption on Socioeconomic Status of farmers, in Western Wollega, Ethiopia. Asian J. Research Chem. 2020; 13(6):440-448. doi: 10.5958/0974-4150.2020.00079.6
Cite(Electronic):
Gemechu Bekana, Tagay Takele. Impacts of New Agricultural Technology Adoption on Socioeconomic Status of farmers, in Western Wollega, Ethiopia. Asian J. Research Chem. 2020; 13(6):440-448. doi: 10.5958/0974-4150.2020.00079.6 Available on: https://ajrconline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2020-13-6-6
REFERENCES:
1. Akudugu, M., Guo, E., Dadzie, S. (2012) Adoption of Modern Agricultural Production Technologies by Farm Households in Ghana: What Factors Influence their Decisions? Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare 2(3)
2. Challa, Merga (2013). Determining Factors and Impacts of Modern Agricultural Technology Adoption in West Wollega, Munich, GRIN Publishing GmbH, http://www.grin.com/en/e-book/280336/determining-factors-and-impacts-of-modern-agricultural-technology-adoption.
3. Diiro, G. (2013). Impact of Off-farm Income on Technology Adoption Intensity and Productivity: Evidence from Rural Maize Farmers in Uganda. International Food Policy Research Institute, Working Paper 11
4. FAO (2003). Statement at the Ministerial Conference of the WTO - Circulated by H.E. Hartwig de Haen, Assistant Director-General, Fifth Session, Cancun, 10-14 September, Doc No: WT/MIN (03)/ST/61.
5. FAO 2011. The state of food and Agriculture, Women in agriculture, ISSN 0081-4539 FAO (2012) OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook, 2012-2021
6. Gemechu Bekana, 2020. “Cooperation for Innovation and its impact on Technological and Non-technological Innovations: Empirical Evidence for Western Ethiopian Manufacturing SMEs”, Research Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 12(2), 0975 – 4385.
7. Hoshmand A. R (1988). Statistical Method for Agricultural Sciences
8. Hosmer, D.W. and Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied Logistic Regression, John Wliey and Son, Inc.
9. IMF (2007). World Economic Outlook. International Monitory Fund, Washington DC.
10. Jain R. Arora A and Raju S. (2009). A Novel Adoption Index of Selected Agricultural Technologies: Linkages with Infrastructure and Productivity: Agricultural Economics Research Review 22; pp 109-120
11. Johnston, B., F. P. Kilby, (1975). Agriculture and Structural Transformation, Economic Strategies in Late Developing Countries, New York: Oxford University Press
12. Kariyasa, K., Dewi, A. (2011). Analysis of Factors Affecting Adoption of Integrated Crop Management Farmer Field School (Icm-Ffs) in Swampy Areas. International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics 1(2): pp 29-38
13. Mendola M. (2007). Agricultural technology adoption and poverty reduction: A propensity-score matchinganalysis for rural Bangladesh, Elsevier, Food Policy 32, 372–393
14. Rubin. D.B and Rosenbaum P.R., (1983). The central role of the propensity scores in observational studies for causal effects, Biometika, 70, 1: 41-55
15. Solomon Asfaw, Bekele Shiferaw, Franklin Simtowe and Mekbib Gebretsadik Haile. (2011). Agricultural technology adoption, seed access constraints and commercialization in Ethiopia, Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 3, 9:436-447
16. Solomon Asfaw (2010). Estimating Welfare Effect of Modern Agricultural Technologies: A Micro-Perspective from Tanzania and Ethiopia, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Nairobi, Kenya,
17. West wollega Zone (2013), Agricultural Development Office and Woreda Finance and Economic Development Office.